Eubacterial PCR - the usefulness of the molecular method in clinical practice

  • Zala Lužnik University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Tjaša Cerar Kišek Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloska str. 4, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Eva Ružić-Sabljić Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloska str. 4, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Manica Müller Premru Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloska str. 4, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Tomaž Jurca Clinic for Infectious Diseases and Febrile Illnesses, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Japljeva str. 2, 1525 Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • in Janez Tomažič Clinic for Infectious Diseases and Febrile Illnesses, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Japljeva str. 2, 1525 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Keywords: bacterial infections, specimens, cultivation, identification, 16S rRNK PCR

Abstract

Abstract

Background: Isolation and identification of bacterial pathogens enables accurate diagnosis of bacterial infection, allowing rational use of appropriate narrow-spectrum antibiotics. In some cases, the routine bacterial culture can give negative results. In those cases additional use of molecular techniques such as eubacterial (broad-range 16S rRNA) PCR may detect and identify bacterial genetic material.

Methods: Between February 2012 and April 2013 42 specimens from 35 patients, already treated with antimicrobials, were taken and tested by eubacterial PCR in addition to routine microbiological culture. Results: Eubacterial PCR yielded positive result in 21/42 specimens in 18 patients (in three mixed sequences). Therefore, in 15 patients the diagnosis of bacterial infection was obtained with DNA identification and the results were interpreted in accordance to patients’ history, laboratory and image diagnostics. Only 4 specimens were culture-positive.

Conclusions: Although eubacterial PCR enables the identification of any bacterial DNA in clinical specimens, there are some limitations: no information concerning antimicrobial susceptibility of the causative agents, problem of differentiating living from dead bacteria and problem to differentiate contaminants from pathogenic bacteria. The method is also expensive. In the following article recommendations for appropriate and rational use of eubacterial PCR are presented.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Zala Lužnik, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia
M.D.
Tjaša Cerar Kišek, Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloska str. 4, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
univ. dipl. mikr., Ph.D.
Eva Ružić-Sabljić, Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloska str. 4, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
prof. Eva Ružić-Sabljić, M.D., Ph.D.
Manica Müller Premru, Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloska str. 4, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
prof. Manica Müller Premru, M.D., Ph.D.
Tomaž Jurca, Clinic for Infectious Diseases and Febrile Illnesses, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Japljeva str. 2, 1525 Ljubljana, Slovenia
M.D., MSc
in Janez Tomažič, Clinic for Infectious Diseases and Febrile Illnesses, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Japljeva str. 2, 1525 Ljubljana, Slovenia
prof. Janez Tomažič, M.D., Ph.D.

References

Pulcini C, Gyssens IC. How to educate prescribers in antimicrobial stewardship practices.Virulence. 2013; 4(2): 192-202.

Harris KA in Hartley JC. Development of broad-range 16S rDNA PCR for use in the routine diagnostic clinical microbiology service. J Med Microbiol. 2003; 52: 685-91.

Sibley CD, Peirano G, Church DL. Molecular methods for pathogen and microbial community detection and characterization: current and potential application in diagnostic microbiology. Infect Genet Evol. 2012; 12(3): 505-21.

Sontakke S, Cadenas MB, Maggi RG, Diniz PP, Breitschwerdt EB. Use of broad range 16S rDNA PCR in clinical microbiology. J Microbiol Methods. 2009; 76: 217-25.

Jensen KH, Dargis R, Christensen JJ, Kemp M. Ribosomal PCR and DNA sequencing for detection and identification of bacteria: experience from 6 years of routine analyses of patient samples. APMIS. 2013 Jul 24.

Mignard S, Flandrois JP. 16S rRNA sequencing in routine bacterial identification: a 30-month experiment. J Microbiol Methods. 2006; 67: 574-81.

Doolittle WF. Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree. Science. 1999; 284: 2124-8.

Rantakokko-Jalava K, Nikkari S, Jalava J, Eerola E, Skurnik M, Meurman O, et al. Direct amplification of rRNA genes in diagnosis of bacterial infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2000; 38(1): 32-9.

Bosshard PP, Kronenberg A, Zbinden R, Ruef C, Böttger EC in Altwegg M. Etiologic Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis by Broad-Range Polymerase Chain Reaction: A 3-Year Experience. Clin Infect Dis. 2003; 37(2):167–72.

Kommedal O, Lekang K, Langeland N, Wiker HG. Characterization of polybacterial clinical samples using a set of group-specific broad-range primers targeting the 16S rRNA gene followed by DNA sequencing and RipSeq analysis. J Med Microbiol. 2011; 60(Pt 7): 927-36.

Döring G, Unertl K, Heininger A. Validation criteria for nucleic acid amplification techniques for bacterial infections. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008; 46(7): 909-18.

Welinder-Olsson C, Dotevall L, Hogevik H, Jungnelius R, Trollfors B, Wahl M, et al. Comparison of broad-range bacterial PCR and culture of cerebrospinal fluid for diagnosis of community-acquired bacterial meningitis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007; 13(9): 879-86.

Rosey AL, Abachin E, Quesnes G, Cadilhac C, Pejin Z, Glorion C, et al. Development of a broad-range 16S rDNA real-time PCR for the diagnosis of septic arthritis in children. J Microbiol Methods. 2007; 68(1): 88-93.

Ammann RA, Zucol F, Aebi C, Niggli FK, Kühne T, Nadal D. Real-time broad-range PCR versus blood culture. A prospective pilot study in pediatric cancer patients with fever and neutropenia. Support Care Cancer. 2007; 15(6): 637-41.

Published
2015-10-19
How to Cite
1.
Lužnik Z, Cerar Kišek T, Ružić-Sabljić E, Müller Premru M, Jurca T, Tomažič in J. Eubacterial PCR - the usefulness of the molecular method in clinical practice. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 19Oct.2015 [cited 6May2024];84(10). Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/1019
Section
Review