Healthcare process analysis and improvement at Department of abdominal surgery-University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Abstract
Background: Healthcare processes in hospitals, like processes in companies or governmental organizations, may accumulate problems and obstacles over time, which consequently cause the processes to become ineffective. BPM is an approach for process modeling, improvement and automating, which has been used with great success for process improvement.
Methods: This work was to examine the possibility of carrying out healthcare process improvement using BPM. To implement BPM ideas, a revised TAD methodology was developed, representing an important contribution to the BPM. The first three phases of the TAD methodology were introduced in a step-by-step approach. The first phase deals with process identification, the second develops the "as-is" model, and the third phase discusses process improvement by developing the "to-be" model.
Results: We found that (a) the Surgery process is efficient and well organized; (b) patient stay in the clinic could be shortened; however for humane and social reasons the leadership prefers to leave the residence time as it is; (c) the process is connected to some time-consuming activities which are perfrmed in other departments and represent the bottleneck of the process.
Conclusions: The following were concluded (a) BPM proved to be a suitable approach for carrying out healthcare process improvement; (b) the revised TAD methodology showed to be consistent and efficient in performing BPM approach; (c) The Surgery process discussed was found to be an effective one and no changes or improvements are needed; (d) Concerning time-consuming activities, the leadership decided to discuss this problem with the management of the departments where the activities are executed.Downloads
References
Khan NR. Business process management, a practical guide. Florida: Meghan-Kiffer Press; 2004.
Laguna, M, Marklund J. Business process modelling, simulation, and design. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc; 2005.
Rončević B, Makarovič M. Societal steering in theoretical perspective: social becoming as an analytical solution. Polish Sociological Review. 2011; 176, 4: 461-472.
Rončević B, Modic D. Regional systems of innovations as social fields. Sociologija i proctor. 2011; 49, 191: 313-333.
Rončević, B, Makarovič M. Towards the strategies of modern social processes. The European Journal of Social Science Research. 2010; 23, 3: 223—239.
Aguilar-Saven R, Olhager J. Integration of product, process and functional orientations: principles and a case study. Preprints of the International Conference on Advanced Production Management Systems. APMS, IFIP, The Netherlands. 2002; 257: 375-389.
Šuteršič O, Rajkovič U, Dinevski D, Jereb J, Rajkovič V. Evaluation of a patient’s health status is an essential part of the healthcare process. Journal of International Medical research. 2009; 37: 1646-1654.
Damij N, Damij T, Grad J, Jelenc F. A methodology for business process improvement and IS development. Inf. softw. Technol. 2008; 50: 1127-1141
Davenport TH. Process innovation: Reengineering work through information technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1993.
Watson HG. Business systems engineering: managing breakthrough changes for productivity and profit. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1994.
Hammer M. Reengineering work: don’t automate. Obliterate. Harvard Business Review. 1990; 68, 4: 104–112.
Aguilar-Saven R. Business process modelling: review and framework. International Journal of Production Economics. 2003; 90, 2: 129–149.
Ould MA. Business processes: modelling and analysis for re-engineering and improvement. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons; 1995.
Weske M. Business process management: concepts, languages, architectures. New York: Springer; 2007.
Damij N, Damij T. Process management: a multi-disciplinary guide to theory, modeling, and methodology. Berlin: Springer; 2014.
Harrington HJ, Esseling E, van Nimwegen H. Business process improvement workbook. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1997.
Banks J, Carson SJ, Nelson LB, Nicol MD. Discrete-event system simulation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2001.
Anupindi R, Chopra S, Deshmukh DS, van Mieghem AJ, Zemel E. Management business process flows: principles of operations management. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc; 2006.
The Author transfers to the Publisher (Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal) all economic copyrights following form Article 22 of the Slovene Copyright and Related Rights Act (ZASP), including the right of reproduction, the right of distribution, the rental right, the right of public performance, the right of public transmission, the right of public communication by means of phonograms and videograms, the right of public presentation, the right of broadcasting, the right of rebroadcasting, the right of secondary broadcasting, the right of communication to the public, the right of transformation, the right of audiovisual adaptation and all other rights of the author according to ZASP.
The aforementioned rights are transferred non-exclusively, for an unlimited number of editions, for the term of the statutory
The Author can make use of his work himself or transfer subjective rights to others only after 3 months from date of first publishing in the journal Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal.
The Publisher (Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal) has the right to transfer the rights, acquired parties without explicit consent of the Author.
The Author consents that the Article be published under the Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 (attribution-non-commercial) or comparable licence.
