Hearing preservation with a hybrid cochlear implant (electro-acoustic stimulation) – case report

  • Janez Rebol Oddelek za otorinolaringologijo in maksilofacialno kirurgijo UKC Maribor Ljubljanska 5 2000 Maribor
Keywords: hybrid cochlear implant, electro-acoustic stimulation, hearing preservation, round window insertion

Abstract

Typical preoperative hearing loss of candidates for a hybrid cochlear implant ranges from mild to moderate hearing loss in the low frequencies (up to 500 Hz) and severe to profound hearing loss in the mid and high frequencies (above 1500 Hz). Usually, the patients have limited or no benefit from hearing aids and their word discrimination score is between 10–60 %. These patients often do not use the hearing aids at all, because they do not hear well in the middle and high frequencies.

This 8-year old boy presented with symetrical hearing loss, which was profound in middle and high frequencies and moderate in low frequencies. Because of that, his speech development was impaired. We inserted a hybrid cochlear implant with a hearing preservation electrode by atraumatic insertion technique through the round window and succeeded to preserve his residual hearing. He adapted well to the use of hearing aid and cochlear implant and significantly improved understanding of the high frequency words and sentences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Podskrabi- Fayette R, Pilka A, Skarzynski H. Electric stimulation complements functional residual hearing in partial deafness. Acta Oto- Laryngologica 2010; 130: 888–896.

Praetorius M, Staecker H, Plinkert PK. Chirurgische Technik der Kochleaimplantation. HNO 2009; 57: 663–670.

Briggs R, Tykocinski M, Xu J, Risi F, Svehla M, Cowan R, Stoever T et al. Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode. Audiol Neurotol 2006; 11(suppl): 42–48.

Adunka OF, Pilsbury H, Buchman C. Minimizing intracochlear trauma during cochlear implantation. In: Van de Heyning P, Kleine Punte A (eds). Cochlear implants and hearing preservation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol Basel Karger 2010; 67: 96–107.

Adunka OF, Radeloff A, Gstoettner WK, Pilsbury HC, Buchman CA. Scala tympani cochleostomy II: topography and histology. Laryngoscope 117: 2195–2200.

Fraysse B, Ramos Macias A, Sterkers O, Burdo S, Ramsden R et al. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the Nucleus 24 Contour Advance cochlear implant. Otology& Neurotology 2006; 27: 624–633.

Xu Y, Briggs R, Tykocinski M, Newbold C, Risi F, Cowan R. Seeing electrode movement in the cochlea. Micro-focus fluoroscopy- a great tool for electrode development. Cochlear Implants Int 2009; 10: 115–119.

Buechner A,Schuessler M, Battmer RD, Stoever T, Lesinski- Schiedat A, Lenarz T. Impact on low- frequency hearing. Audiology&Neurotology 2009; 14(suppl): 8–13.

Dorman MF, Spahr AJ, Loizou PC, Dana CJ, Schmidt JS. Acoustic stimulations of combined electric and acoustic hearing Ear Hear. 2005 ; 26: 371–80.

Von Ilberg C, Kiefer J, Tillein J, PfenningdorfT, Hartmann R, Sturzenbecher E et al. Electroacoustic stimulation of the auditory system of the auditory system: new technology for severe hearing loss. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1999; 61: 334–341.

Lenarz T, Stoever T, Buechner A, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Patrick J, Pesch J. Hearing conservation surgery using the Hybrid-L electrode. Audiol Neurotol 2009; 14 (suppl): 22–31.

How to Cite
1.
Rebol J. Hearing preservation with a hybrid cochlear implant (electro-acoustic stimulation) – case report. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 1 [cited 15May2024];82(12). Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/1034
Section
Case report, short scientific article