Adult cancer patients on home parenteral nutrition in Slovenia, data analysis by the Clinical Nutrition Unit of the Institute of Oncology in Ljubljana, in the period 2008–2012.

  • Nada Rotovnik Kozjek Enota za klinično prehrano, Onkološki inštitut, Zaloška 2, Si-1000 Ljubljana
  • Barbara Koroušić Seljak Odsek za računalniške sisteme, Institut »Jožef Stefan«, Jamova c. 39, Si-1000 Ljubljana
Keywords: cancer patient, intestinal failure, home parenteral nutrition

Abstract

Introduction: Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) represents a kind of therapy for intestinal failure. The system of HPN for adult patients was established in Slovenia by the Clinical Nutrition Unit of the Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana in 2008. The aim of the article is to analyse Slovenian data on HPN in cancer patients in the four-year period from 2008 to 2012.

Patients and Methods: In the time period from 2008 to 2012, 53 cancer patients were included in the HPN system in Slovenia–19 males and 34 females.

Results: The average age of the patients at enrollment into the HPN system was 53 years. This represents 74.6 % of all patients on HPN who were registered in our unit in this period. Forty-four patients had advanced cancer and 9 patients had no recurrence of cancer during the observation period. In patients with advanced cancer, tumors of the gastrointestinal tract (15 patients stomach and esophagus, 11 patients colon and rectum) and gynecological cancers (10 patients) were represented most frequently.. Gastrointestinal obstruction (74 %) was the major indication for long-term parenteral nutrition in cancer patients. Thirty-seven patients died during the observation period. Median survival time of patients with advanced cancer was 8 months (95 % CI, 3.61 to 12.39 months). Twenty-seven patients received HPN during anti-cancer therapy (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery). Medians for survival time of patients receiving an anticancer therapy and patients without any therapy were 11 months (95 % CI, 3.72 to 18.28 months) and 2 months (95 % CI, 1.26 to 2.74 months), respectively. The survival of patients with anticancer therapy was significantly longer (p < 0.001). The majority of patients (90 %) had HPN each day, 7 times per week. Twenty-eight patients (52 %) had venous access complications . The most common cause of complication was infection in 16 patients (30 %), which did not shorten the survival time of patients with advanced cancer. The number of VAP complications was time-independent and did not affect the survival of the observed patients. The significance value was 0.44 (95 % CI, 0.153–2.275).

Conclusion: The results of the retrospective study represent the first Slovenian data on the survival time of cancer patients on HPN treatment for intestinal failure. The results are comparable to the results from European surveys, which are a direct indicator that inclusion criteria for HPN in cancer patients used in Slovenia are good. Introduction of HPN as a therapeutic option also offers a possibility to continue with anticancer therapy and improve the survival rate of patients with advanced cancer. They are also an indirect sign that the quality of HPN service is good and serves as a platform for further development of HPN in cancer patients in Slovenia, and at the same time for other patients who would need a replacement therapy in the form of HPN owing to intestinal failure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wanten G, Calder P, Forbes A.. Managing adult patients who need home parenteral nutrition. BMJ 2011; 342: 1447.

Shils ME, Wright WL Turnbull A, Brescia P. Long-term parenteral nutrition through external arteriovenous shunt. NEJM 1970; 283: 341–344.

Van Gossum A, Bakker H, Bozzetti F, Staun M, Leon-Sanz M, Hebuterne X, Pertkiewicz M, et al. Home parenteral nutrition in adults: a European multicentre survey in 1997. Clin Nutr 1999; 18: 135–140.

Staun M, Pironi L, Bozzetti F, Baxter J, Forbes A, Joly F. ESPEN guidelines on parenteral nutrition: home parenteral nutrition (HPN) in adult patients. Clin Nutr 2009; 28: 467–479.

Messig B, Crenn P, Boutron-Ruault MC, Rambaud JC, Matuchansky C. Long-term survival and parenteral nutrition dependence in adult patients with short bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 1999; 117: 1043–50.

Bozzetti F. Home total parenteral nutrition in incurable cancer patients: a therapy, a basic humane care or something in between? Clin Nutr 2003; 22: 109–111.

Weiner RS, Kramer BS, Clamon GH, Feld R, Evans W, Moran EM.. Effects of intravenous hyperalimentation during treatment in patients with small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1985; 3: 949–957.

Shamberger RC, Brennan MF, Goodgame JT, Lowry SF, Maher MM, Wesley RA. A prospective, randomized study of adjuvant parenteral nutrition in the treatment of sarcomas: results of metabolic and survival studies. Surgery. 1984; 96: 1–13.

McGeer AJ, Detsky AS, O’Rourke K. Parenteral nutrition in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a meta-analysis. Nutrition. 1990; 6: 233–240.

American College of Physicians. Parenteral nutrition in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 1989; 110: 734–736.

Whitworth MK, Whitfield A, Holm S, Shaffer J, Makin W, Jayson GC. Doctor, does this mean I’m going to starve to death? J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22: 199–201.

Bozzeti F, Cozzaglio L, Biganzoli E, Chiavenna G, De Cicco M, Donati D, Gilli G. Quality of life and length of survival in advanced cancer patients on home parenteral nutrition. Clin Nutr 2002; 21: 281–8.

Arnold F. Clinical care of hunger strikers. Lancet 2008; 372: 1544.

Bozzetti F, Arends J, Lundholm K, Micklewright A, Zurcher G, Muscaritoli M. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: non-surgical oncology.Clin Nutr 2009; 28: 445–54.

Chermesh I, Mashiach T, Amit A, Haim N, Papier I, Efergan R. Home parenteral nutrition for incurable cancer with gastrointestinal obstruction: do the benefits outweigh the risks? Med Oncol 2011; 28: 83–88.

Vafa H, Ballarin A, Arvanitakis M, Vereecken S, Dutat F, Lagasse C. Lessons from a 20-year experience of home parenteral nutrition in adult patients. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2010; 73: 451–456.

Cozzaglio L, Balzola F, Cosentino F, DeCicco M, Fellagara P, Gaggiotti G, et al. Outcome of cancer patients receiving home parenteral nutrition. Italian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (S.I.N.P.E.). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1997; 21: 339–42.

Fan BG. Parenteral nutrition prolongs the survival of patients associated with malignant gastrointestinal obstruction. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2007; 31: 508–10.

Santarpia L, Alfonsi L, Pasanisi F, De Caprio C, Scalfi L, Contaldo F. Predictive factors of survival in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis on home parenteral nutrition. Nutrition 2006; 22: 355–60.

Dressen M, Foulon V, Vanhaecht K, De Pourcq L, Hiele M, Willems L. Guidelines recommendations on care of adult patients receiving home parenteral nutrition: A systematic review of global practices. Clin Nutr 2012; 31: 602–8.

Bozzetti F, Amadori D, Bruera E, Cozzaglio L, Corli O, Filiberti A. Guidelines on artificial nutrition versus hydration in terminal cancer patients. European Association for Palliative Care. Nutrition 1996; 12: 163–7.

Steinhauzer K, Christakis N, Clippe, McNeilly M, McIntyre L, Tulsky JA. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians and other care providers. JAMA 2000; 284: 2476–2482.

How to Cite
1.
Rotovnik Kozjek N, Koroušić Seljak B. Adult cancer patients on home parenteral nutrition in Slovenia, data analysis by the Clinical Nutrition Unit of the Institute of Oncology in Ljubljana, in the period 2008–2012. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 1 [cited 4May2024];83(3). Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/1135
Section
Original article