The value of corrected TIMI frame count measurements and measurements of coronary artery stenosis for predicting the flow through the coronary artery bypass

  • Viljem Haris Topčič Univerzitetni Klinični Center Ljubljana, Klinični oddelek za splošno kirurgijo
  • Matija Jelenc Univerzitetni Klinični Center Ljubljana, Klinični oddelek za kirurgijo srca in ožilja
  • Borut Geršak Univerzitetni Klinični Center Ljubljana, Klinični oddelek za kirurgijo srca in ožilja
Keywords: coronary artery bypass, coronary angiography, transit time flow measurement, TIMI frame count, coronary artery stenosis

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the prognostic value of corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (cTFC) measurements and different cutoff values of the degree of proximal coronary artery stenosis in a series of patients who had undergone elective isolated coronary artery bypass surgery.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 98 patients who had elective isolated coronary artery bypass surgery performed at our institution between January 2008 and March 2009 was made. Preoperatively, all patients had undergone angiography. The degree of epicardial coronary stenosis was estimated visually by the cardiologist, and cTFC of the target coronary arteries was obtained from standard projections on preoperative coronary angiograms with frame rate of 12.5 frames/s. All bypass grafts were evaluated by intraoperative transit time flow measurement (TTFM).

Results: All bypass grafts were divided according to the results into four nearly equally sized groups using cTFC and percentage of proximal coronary artery stenosis. The cut-off values for both cTFC and percentage of stenosis were their median values (cTFC–14, percentage of stenosis–80 %). Bypass grafts in the four groups showed significant differences in mean flow.In group 1 (high percent stenosis and high cTFC) mean bypass graft flow was 38.3 ± 20.3 ml/min, in group 2 (low percent stenosis and high cTFC) mean bypass graft flow was 29.0 ± 15.1 ml/min, in group 3 (high percent stenosis and low cTFC) mean bypass graft flow was 48.2 ± 26.3 ml/min, and in group 4 (low percent stenosis and low cTFC) mean bypass graft flow was 35.3 ± 14.8 ml/min. Differences between individual groups were significant for all combinations except when comparing group 1 with group 4.

Conclusion: Combining the data obtained from coronary angiography and TFC has shown to have a good predictive value for postoperative coronary bypass graft flow, and could thus help surgeons in making choice of target vessels for bypass surgery or help them decide whather revision of a bypass graft would be beneficial.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Herman C, Sullivan JA, Buth K, Legare JF. Intraoperative graft flow measurements during coronary artery bypass surgery predict in-hospital outcomes. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2008; 7: 582–5.

Bauer SF, Bauer K, Ennker IC, Rosendahl U, Ennker J. Intraoperative bypass flow measurement reduces the incidence of postoperative ventricular fibrillation and myocardial markers after coronary revascularisation. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 53: 217–22.

Becit N, Erkut B, Ceviz M, Unlu Y, Colak A, Kocak H. The impact of intraoperative transit time flow measurement on the results of on-pump coronary surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007; 32: 313–8.

Tokuda Y, Song MH, Oshima H, Usui A, Ueda Y. Predicting midterm coronary artery bypass graft failure by intraoperative transit time flow measurement. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 86: 532–6.

Tokuda Y, Song MH, Ueda Y, Usui A, Akita T. Predicting early coronary artery bypass graft failure by intraoperative transit time flow measurement. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 84: 1928–33.

Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, Van Der Voort PH, Bonnier HJ, Bartunek JKJJ, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1703–8.

Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Daley WL, Dodge JT, Jr., Alexander B, Jr., Marble SJ, et al. TIMI frame count: a quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow. Circulation 1996; 93: 879–88.

Vijayalakshmi K, Kunadian B, Whittaker VJ, Williams D, Wright RA, Sutton AG, et al. The impact of chronically diseased coronary arteries and stenting on the corrected TIMI frame count in elective coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 70: 691–700.

Kobatake R, Sato T, Fujiwara Y, Sunami H, Yoshioka R, Ikeda T, et al. Comparison of the effects of nitroprusside versus nicorandil on the slow/no--reflow phenomenon during coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction. Heart Vessels 2011; 26: 379–84.

Ege M, Guray U, Guray Y, Yilmaz MB, Demirkan B, Sasmaz A, et al. Relationship between TIMI frame count and admission glucose values in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction patients who underwent successful primary percutaneous intervention. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2011; 11: 213–7.

Zhao L, Wang L, Zhang Y. Elevated admission serum creatinine predicts poor myocardial blood flow and one-year mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol 2009; 21: 493–8.

Sobkowicz B, Tomaszuk-Kazberuk A, Kralisz P, Malyszko J, Kalinowski M, Hryszko T, et al. Coronary blood flow in patients with end-stage renal disease assessed by thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count method. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010; 25: 926–30.

Yasar AS, Turhan H, Erbay AR, Karabal O, Bicer A, Sasmaz H, et al. Assessment of coronary blood flow in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count method. J Invasive Cardiol 2005; 17: 73–6.

Saatci Yasar A, Bilen E, Yuksel IO, Ipek G, Kurt M, Ipek E, et al. Assessment of coronary blood flow in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy with the TIMI frame count method. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2010; 10: 514–8.

Erdogan D, Caliskan M, Gullu H, Sezgin AT, Yildirir A, Muderrisoglu H. Coronary flow reserve is impaired in patients with slow coronary flow. Atherosclerosis 2007; 191: 168–74.

Celik T, Yuksel UC, Bugan B, Iyisoy A, Celik M, Demirkol S, et al. Increased platelet activation in patients with slow coronary flow. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2010; 29: 310–5.

Barutcu I, Sezgin AT, Sezgin N, Gullu H, Esen AM, Topal E, et al. Increased high sensitive CRP level and its significance in pathogenesis of slow coronary flow. Angiology 2007; 58: 401–7.

Gibson CM, Murphy S, Menown IB, Sequeira RF, Greene R, Van de Werf F, et al. Determinants of coronary blood flow after thrombolytic administration. TIMI Study Group. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34: 1403–12.

Gibson CM, Ryan KA, Kelley M, Rizzo MJ, Mesley R, Murphy S, et al. Methodologic drift in the assessment of TIMI grade 3 flow and its implications with respect to the reporting of angiographic trial results. The TIMI Study Group. Am Heart J 1999; 137: 1179–84.

Vijayalakshmi K, Ashton VJ, Wright RA, Hall JA, Stewart MJ, Davies A, et al. Corrected TIMI frame count: applicability in modern digital catheter laboratories when different frame acquisition rates are used. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004; 63: 426–32.

Esen AM, Acar G, Esen O, Emiroglu Y, Akcakoyun M, Pala S, et al. The prognostic value of combined fractional flow reserve and TIMI frame count measurements in patients with stable angina pectoris and acute coronary syndrome. J Interv Cardiol 2010; 23: 421-8.

How to Cite
1.
Haris Topčič V, Jelenc M, Geršak B. The value of corrected TIMI frame count measurements and measurements of coronary artery stenosis for predicting the flow through the coronary artery bypass. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 1 [cited 27Apr.2024];83(11). Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/1312
Section
Original article