PLANNED HOME BIRTH: A REVIEW
Abstract
Background: Home birth is as old as humanity, but still most middle- and high-income countries consider hospitals as the safest birth settings, as complications regarding birth are highly unpredictable. Despite this there are a few countries in which home birth in integrated into official healthcare system (the Netherlands, United Kingdom, Canada etc.). Home births can be divided into unplanned and planned, and the latter can be further categorized by the presence of the birth attendants. This review focuses on planned home births, which are differently represented throughout the world. In the United States 0.6-1.0% of all children are born at home, in the United Kingdom 2-3%, in Canada 1.6% and in the Netherlands 20-30%. For Slovenia, the number of planned home births is unknown; however, in 2010 0.1% of children were born outside medical facilities.
Conclusions: The safety of home birth in still under the debate. While research confirms smaller number of obstetric interventions and some complications in mothers who give birth at home, the data regarding the neonatal and perinatal mortality and morbidity is still conflicting. This confirms the need for large multicentric trials in this field. Current home birth guidelines emphasize that women should be well informed regarding the possible advantages and disadvantages of home births. In addition, the emphasis is on definition of selection criteria for home birth, indications for intrapartal transfer to the hospital and appropriate education of birth attendants.
Downloads
References
Olsen O, Clausen JA. Planned hospital birth versus planned home birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012; 9.
Boucher D, Bennett C, McFarlin B, Freeze R. Staying home to give birth: why women in the United States choose home birth. J Midwifery Womens Health 2009 54:119-26.
de Jonge A, van der Goes BY, Ravelli AC, Amelink-Verburg MP, Mol BW, Nijhuis JG, Bennebroek Gravenhorst J, Buitendijk SE. Perinatal mortality and morbidity in a nationwide cohort of 529,688 low-risk planned home and hospital births. BJOG 2009; 116: 1177-84.
The American College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians, Committee Opinion No. 476. Planned home birth. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:425-8. Dosegljivo 3. 10. 2015 s spletne strani: http://www.acog.org/-/media/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Obstetric-Practice/co476.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20151123T1814241720.
Cheng YW, Snowden JM, King TL, Caughey AB. Selected perinatal outcomes associated with planned home births in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209: 325.e1-8.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists/Royal College of Midwives Joint statement No. 2. Home births. Dosegljivo 3. 10. 2015 s spletne strani: http://www.rsfq.qc.ca/pdf/recherches/UK_Homebirth_Statement.pdf.
Birthplace in England Collaborative Group. Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ 2011; 343: d7400.
Hutton EK, Reitsma AH, Kaufman K. Outcomes associated with planned home and planned hospital births in low-risk women attended by midwives in Ontario, Canada, 2003-2006: a retrospective cohort study. Birth. 2009; 36: 180-9.
van der Kooy J, Poeran J, de Graaf JP, Birnie E, Denktasş S, Steegers EA, Bonsel GJ. Planned home compared with planned hospital births in the Netherlands: intrapartum and early neonatal death in low-risk pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 1037-46.
Razpotnik B. Svetovni dan prebivalstva 2012. Statistični urad Republike Slovenije. Dosegljivo 5. 10. 2015 s spletne strani:
http://www.stat.si/StatWeb/glavnanavigacija/podatki/prikazistaronovico?IdNovice=4835.
Lazić I, Takač I. Outcomes and risk factors for unplanned delivery at home and before arrival to the hospital. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2011; 123: 11-4.
Janssen PA, Saxell L, Page LA, Klein MC, Liston RM, Lee SK. Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician. CMAJ 2009; 181: 377-83.
Janssen PA, Lee SK, Ryan ER, Saxell L. An evaluation of process and protocols for planned home birth attended by regulated midwives in British Columbia. J Midwifery Womens Health 2003; 48: 138-45.
Johnson KC, Daviss BA. Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America. BMJ 2005; 330: 1416.
Chang J J, Macones G A. Birth outcomes of planned home births in Missouri: a population-based study. Am J Perinatol 2011; 28: 529-36.
Davis D, Baddock S, Pairman S, Hunter M, Benn C, Wilson D, Dixon L, Herbison P. Planned place of birth in New Zealand: does it affect mode of birth and intervention rates among low-risk women? Birth 2011; 38: 111-9.
Malloy MH. Infant outcomes of certified nurse midwife attended home births: United States 2000 to 2004. J Perinat 2010; 30: 622–7.
de Jonge A, Mesman JA, Manniën J, Zwart JJ, van Dillen J, van Roosmalen J. Severe adverse maternal outcomes among low risk women with planned home versus hospital births in the Netherlands: nationwide cohort study. BMJ 2013; 346: f3263.
Wax JR, Lucas FL, Lamont M, et al. Maternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth vs planned hospital births: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 243.e1-8.
Symon A, Winter C, Inkster M, Donnan PT. Outcomes for births booked under an independent midwife and births in NHS maternity units: matched comparison study. BMJ 2009; 338: b2060.
Janssen PA, Carty EA, Reime B. Satisfaction with planned place of birth among midwifery clients in British Columbia. J Midwifery Womens Health 2006; 51: 91-7.
Bastian H, Keirse MJ, Lancaster PA. Perinatal death associated with planned home birth in Australia: population based study. BMJ 1998; 317: 384-8.
Kirby RS, Frost J. Maternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth vs planned hospital births: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204: e16.
Sandall J, Bewley S, Newburn M. "Home birth triples the neonatal death rate": public communication of bad science? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204: e17-8.
Gyte GM, Dodwell MJ, Macfarlane AJ. Home birth metaanalysis: does it meet AJOG's reporting requirements? Am J Obstet Gynecol.2011; 204: e15.
Davey MA, Flood MM. Perinatal mortality and planned home birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 204: e18.
Zohar N, De Vries R. Study validity questioned. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204: e14.
Johnson KC, Daviss BA. International data demonstrate home birth safety. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204: e16-7.
de Jonge A, Geerts CC, van der Goes BY, Mol BW, Buitendijk SE, Nijhuis JG. Perinatal mortality and morbidity up to 28 days after birth among 743 070 low-risk planned home and hospital births: a cohort study based on three merged national perinatal databases. BJOG 2015; 122: 720-8.
Knight M. How should we interpret the new Dutch evidence on home birth? BJOG 2015; 122: 729.
Chervenak FA, McCullough LB, Arabin B, Brent RL, Levene MI, Grünebaum A. Planned homebirth: not a Dutch treat for export. BJOG 2015; 122: 730.
Evers AC, Brouwers HA, Hukkelhoven CW, Nikkels PG, Boon J, van Egmond-Linden A, Hillegersberg J et al. Perinatal mortality and severe morbidity in low and high risk term pregnancies in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2010; 341: c5639.
American Academy of Pediatrics. Planned home birth. Policy statement. Pediatrics; 2013. Dosegljivo 3. 10. 2015 s spletne strani:
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/pediatrics/early/2013/04/24/peds.2013-0575.full.pdf.
Ravelli AC, Jager KJ, de Groot MH, Erwich JJ, Rijninks-van Driel GC, Tromp M, Eskes M et al. Travel time from home to hospital and adverse perinatal outcomes in women at term in the Netherlands. BJOG 2011; 118: 457-65.
International Confederation of Midwives Policy Statement. Home birth. Dosegljivo 3. 10. 2015 s spletne strani:
Za vodenje poroda na domu bo ministrstvo dalo pobudo za pripravo strokovnih smernic in standardov. Ministrstvo za zdravje Republike Slovenije. Dosegljivo 5. 10. 2015 s spletne strani:
The Author transfers to the Publisher (Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal) all economic copyrights following form Article 22 of the Slovene Copyright and Related Rights Act (ZASP), including the right of reproduction, the right of distribution, the rental right, the right of public performance, the right of public transmission, the right of public communication by means of phonograms and videograms, the right of public presentation, the right of broadcasting, the right of rebroadcasting, the right of secondary broadcasting, the right of communication to the public, the right of transformation, the right of audiovisual adaptation and all other rights of the author according to ZASP.
The aforementioned rights are transferred non-exclusively, for an unlimited number of editions, for the term of the statutory
The Author can make use of his work himself or transfer subjective rights to others only after 3 months from date of first publishing in the journal Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal.
The Publisher (Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal) has the right to transfer the rights, acquired parties without explicit consent of the Author.
The Author consents that the Article be published under the Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 (attribution-non-commercial) or comparable licence.
