Three - dimensional ultrasound evaluation of tongue volume

  • Urška Barbič Department of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, University Medical Centre Ljubljana. Zaloška 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Ivan Verdenik Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Maja Marolt Mušič Department of Radiology, Institute of Oncology, Zaloška , 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Nataša Ihan Hren Department of maxillofacial and oral surgery, Medical faculty, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Keywords: three – dimensional, ultrasound, tongue, volume

Abstract

Abstract:

Background: The purpose of this study was to find a three - dimensional (3D) ultrasound technique for tongue volume estimation, to compare male and female groups and to find the correlation between tongue volume and body characteristics.

Methods: 3D ultrasound was performed within a group of 14 men and a group of 18 women with norm-occlusion. The collected data were analysed by annexed software and the tongue volume was estimated. The repeatability as well as intra- and inter-rater agreement was determined by calculating intra-class correlation coefficient. The Student t-test was used to determine if there were significant differences in tongue volume and body characteristics between the male and the female groups. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess the relationship between tongue volume and body characteristics.

Results: The 3D ultrasound estimation of tongue volume was highly repeatable in terms of good intraclass correlation coefficients of repeatability (ICC: 0,997) as well as intra- and inter-rater reliabilities (ICC: 0,998 and 0,993 respectively). The male group were significantly taller, heavier and with higher BMI than the female group, and had significantly larger tongue volumes (mean of 89.2 cm3 in males vs. 67.2 cm3 in females). Only the body weights and BMIs in the male group correlated with the tongue volume.

Conclusion: This study did demonstrate a valid and reproducible 3D ultrasound technique for tongue volume assessment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brodie AG. Consideration of musculature in diagnosis, treatment, and retention. American Journal of Orthodontics 1952; 38: 823-35.

Brodie AG. Muscular factors in the diagnosis and treatment of malocclusions*. The Angle orthodontist 1953; 23: 71-7.

Takada K, Sakuda M, Yoshida K, Kawamura Y. Relations between tongue volume and capacity of the oral cavity proper. J Dent Res 1980; 59: 2026-31.

Tamari K, Murakami T, Takahama Y. The dimensions of the tongue in relation to its motility. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 99: 140-6.

Bandy HE, Hunter WS. Tongue volume and the mandibular dentition. Am J Orthod 1969; 56: 134-42.

Oliver RG, Evans SP. Tongue size, oral cavity size and speech. The Angle orthodontist 1986; 56: 234-43.

Adesina BA, Otuyemi OD, Kolawole KA, Adeyemi AT. Assessment of the impact of tongue size in patients with bimaxillary protrusion. Int Orthod 2013; 11: 221-32.

Vig PS, Cohen AM. The size of the tongue and the intermaxillary space. The Angle orthodontist 1974; 44: 25-8.

Lowe AA, Gionhaku N, Takeuchi K, Fleetham JA. Three-dimensional CT reconstructions of tongue and airway in adult subjects with obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986; 90: 364-74.

Uysal T, Yagci A, Ucar FI, Veli I, Ozer T. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of relationship between tongue volume and lower incisor irregularity. Eur J Orthod 2013; 35: 555-62.

Lauder R, Muhl ZF. Estimation of tongue volume from magnetic resonance imaging. The Angle orthodontist 1991; 61: 175-84.

Casas MJ, Seo AH, Kenny DJ. Sonographic examination of the oral phase of swallowing: bolus image enhancement. J Clin Ultrasound 2002; 30: 83-7.

Ovsenik M, Volk J, Marolt MM. A 2D ultrasound evaluation of swallowing in children with unilateral posterior crossbite. Eur J Orthod 2014; 36: 665-71.

Shawker TH, Sonies BC. Tongue movement during speech: a real-time ultrasound evaluation. J Clin Ultrasound 1984; 12: 125-33.

Capilouto GJ, Frederick ED, Challa H. Measurement of infant tongue thickness using ultrasound: a technical note. J Clin Ultrasound 2012; 40: 364-7.

Van Den Engel-Hoek L, Van Alfen N, De Swart BJ, De Groot IJ, Pillen S. Quantitative ultrasound of the tongue and submental muscles in children and young adults. Muscle Nerve 2012; 46: 31-7.

Wojtczak JA. Submandibular sonography: assessment of hyomental distances and ratio, tongue size, and floor of the mouth musculature using portable sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31: 523-8.

Volk J, Kadivec M, Music MM, Ovsenik M. Three-dimensional ultrasound diagnostics of tongue posture in children with unilateral posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138: 608-12.

Bressmann T, Thind P, Uy C, Bollig C, Gilbert RW, Irish JC. Quantitative three-dimensional ultrasound analysis of tongue protrusion, grooving and symmetry: data from 12 normal speakers and a partial glossectomee. Clin Linguist Phon 2005; 19: 573-88.

Rebol J, Pšeničnik S. Prostorski ultrazvok glave in vratu = Three-dimensional ultrasound of the head and neck. Simpozij o tridimenzionalni ultrazvočni preiskavi (3D UZ), Maribor, 3 oktober 2003. [Ljubljana]: Slovensko zdravniško društvo; 2003. p. Str. III-27 - III-30.

Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420-8.

Shawker TH, Sonies BC, Stone M. Soft tissue anatomy of the tongue and floor of the mouth: an ultrasound demonstration. Brain Lang 1984; 21: 335-50.

Pae EK, Lowe AA, Sasaki K, Price C, Tsuchiya M, Fleetham JA. A cephalometric and electromyographic study of upper airway structures in the upright and supine positions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994; 106: 52-9.

Liegeois F, Albert A, Limme M. Comparison between tongue volume from magnetic resonance images and tongue area from profile cephalograms. Eur J Orthod 2010; 32: 381-6.

Do KL, Ferreyra H, Healy JF, Davidson TM. Does tongue size differ between patients with and without sleep-disordered breathing? Laryngoscope 2000; 110: 1552-5.

Iida-Kondo C, Yoshino N, Kurabayashi T, Mataki S, Hasegawa M, Kurosaki N.

Comparison of tongue volume/oral cavity volume ratio between obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients and normal adults using magnetic resonance imaging. J Med Dent Sci 2006; 53: 119-26.

Stratemann S, Huang JC, Maki K, Hatcher D, Miller AJ. Three-dimensional analysis of the airway with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140: 607-15.

Iwasaki T, Saitoh I, Takemoto Y, Inada E, Kakuno E, Kanomi R, et al. Tongue posture improvement and pharyngeal airway enlargement as secondary effects of rapid maxillary expansion: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 143: 235-45.

Published
2016-07-03
How to Cite
1.
Barbič U, Verdenik I, Marolt Mušič M, Ihan Hren N. Three - dimensional ultrasound evaluation of tongue volume. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 3Jul.2016 [cited 26Apr.2024];85(4). Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/1477
Section
Original article