DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF SPUTUM AND ENDOTRACHEAL ASPIRATE GRAM STAIN
Abstract
Background. For decades the microscopic examination of sample Gram stain has been one of the basic diagnostic procedures in the microbiology laboratory. Still opinions about usefulness of sputum and endotracheal aspirate Gram stains in initial management of patients with lower respiratory tract infections differ. We were interested in the value of sputum and endotracheal aspirate Gram stain in a nonselected group of patients.
Material and methods. During 7 months period we examined 1739 sputum samples and 88 endotracheal aspirates. The samples were evaluated for quality by determining the amount of squamous cells and leukocytes. We compared the Gram stain examination to culture results.
Results. Due to poor quality we rejected 48% of sputum samples. The sensitivity of Gram stain for Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus sp. and Moraxella catarrhalis was 61%, 74% and 73%, respectively. Predominance of one typical bacterial morphotype (eg. Gram positive lancet-shaped diplococci) correlated perfectly with culture.
Conclusions. Examination of sputum and endotracheal aspirate Gram stain is useful procedure in patient management and in bacteriological culture evaluation.
Downloads
References
Church D, Melnyk E, Unger B. Quantitative Gram stain interpretation criteria used by microbiology laboratories in Alberta, Canada. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38: 4266–8.
Nagendra S, Bourbeau P, Brecher S, Dunne M, Larocco M, Doern G. Sampling variability in the microbiological evaluation of expectorated sputa and endotracheal aspirates. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39: 2344–7.
Heineman HS, Chawla JK, Lofton WM. Misinformation from sputum cultures without microscopic examination. J Clin Microbiol 1977; 6: 518–27.
Gleckman R, de Vita J, Hibert D, Pelletier C, Martin R. Sputum Gram stain in community-acquired bacteremic pneumonia. J Clin Microbiol 1988; 26: 846–9.
Roson B, Carratala J, Verdaguer R, Dorca J, Manresa F, Gudiol F. Prospective study of the usefulness of sputum Gram stain in the initial approach to community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 31: 869–74.
Lentino JR, Lucks DA. Nonvalue of sputum culture in the management of lower respiratory tract infections. J Clin Microbiol 1987; 25: 758–62.
American Thoracic Society. Guidelines for the initial management of adults with community-acquired pneumonia: diagnosis, assessment of severity and initial antibiotic therapy. Am Rev Resp Dis 1993; 148: 1418–26.
Theerthakarai R, El-Halees W, Ismail M, Solis RA, Anees Khan M. Nonvalue of the initial microbiological studies in the management of non-severe community-acquired pneumonia. Chest 2001; 119: 181–4.
Rein MF, Gwaltney JM, O’Brien MO, Jennings RH, Mandell GL. Accuracy of Gram’s stain in identifying pneumococci in sputum. JAMA 1978; 239: 2671– 3.
Fein A, Grossman R, Ost D, Farber B, Cassiere H. Diagnosis and management of pneumonia and other respiratory infections. Professional Communications Inc., 1999: 35–51.
Leeper KV. Severe community-acquired pneumonia. Sem Resp Infect 1996; 11: 96–108.
Salo P, Leinonen M. Microbiological investigations. Sem Resp Infect 1999; 14: 128–34.
Guckian JC, Christensen WD. Quantitative culture and Gram stain of sputum in pneumonia. Am Rev Resp Dis 1978; 118: 997–1005.
Bartlett JG, Mundy LM. Community acquired pneumonia. N Eng J Med 1995; 333: 1618–24.
Brown PD, Lerner SA. Community acquired pneumonia. The Lancet 1998; 352: 1295–302.
Bartlett JG, Dowell SF, Mandell LA, File TM, Musher DM, Fine MJ. Practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 31: 347– 82.
Tebbutt GM, Coleman DJ. Evaluation of some methods for the laboratory examination of sputum. J Clin Pathol 1978; 31: 724–9.
Wilson LM. General principles of specimen collection and transport. Clin Infect Dis 1996; 22: 766–77.
Őrtquist A. Initial investigation and treatment of the patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia. Sem Resp Infect 1994; 9: 166–79.
European Respiratory Society Task Force. Guidelines for management of adult community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections. Eur Respir J 1998; 11: 986–91.
Mandell LA, Marrie TJ, Grossman RF, Chow AW, Hyland RH and the Canadian Working Group. Canadian guidelines for the initial management of community-acquired pneumonia: an evidence-based update by the Canadian Infectious Diseases Society and the Canadian Thoracic Society. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 31: 383–421.
Murray PR, Washington JA. Microscopic and bacteriologic analysis of expectorated sputum. Mayo Clin Proc 1975; 50: 339–44.
Miller DL. A study for the examination of sputum in a field survey of chronic bronchitis. Am Rev Resp Dis 1963; 88: 473–83.
Boruchoff SE, Weinstein MP. Sputum cultures. Up to date, Ver. 9.1.
Morris AJ, Tanner DC, Reller LB. Rejection criteria for endotracheal aspirates from adults. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31: 1027–9.
The Author transfers to the Publisher (Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal) all economic copyrights following form Article 22 of the Slovene Copyright and Related Rights Act (ZASP), including the right of reproduction, the right of distribution, the rental right, the right of public performance, the right of public transmission, the right of public communication by means of phonograms and videograms, the right of public presentation, the right of broadcasting, the right of rebroadcasting, the right of secondary broadcasting, the right of communication to the public, the right of transformation, the right of audiovisual adaptation and all other rights of the author according to ZASP.
The aforementioned rights are transferred non-exclusively, for an unlimited number of editions, for the term of the statutory
The Author can make use of his work himself or transfer subjective rights to others only after 3 months from date of first publishing in the journal Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal.
The Publisher (Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal) has the right to transfer the rights, acquired parties without explicit consent of the Author.
The Author consents that the Article be published under the Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 (attribution-non-commercial) or comparable licence.
