OPERATIVE TREATMENT FOR DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS

  • Samo K. Fokter Splošna bolnišnica Celje Oblakova 5 3000 Celje
Keywords: spinal stenosis, lumbar spine, decompressive surgery, spondylodesis, results of treatment

Abstract

Background. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) is a common cause of low back and leg pain in the elderly. Conservative treatment seldom results in sustained improvement.

Methods. Fifty-six patients (33 women, 23 men) older than 50 years (mean 67 years, range 51 to 82 years) and with no prior low back surgery were treated from 1993 to 1999 for clinical and radiologic evidence of DLSS. The goal of this study was to describe the results of decompressive laminectomy with or without fusion in terms of reoperation, severity of back pain, leg pain and patient satisfaction. Answers to Swiss spinal stenosis questionnaires completed before surgery and one to five years afterwards were evaluated. Seven patients (12.5%) with degenerative spondylolisthesis, scoliosis and/or more radical facetectomies received fusion.

Results. Of the 56 patients in the original cohort, two were deceased and two had undergone reoperation by follow-up. Forty-eight patients answered questionnaires. Average duration of follow-up was 2.5 years. More than 70 percent of the respondents had no or only mild back or buttock pain at follow-up and more than 60 percent were able to walk more than 500 m. Added fusion reduced the incidence of low back pain and pain frequency, and increased walking distance (ANOVA).

Conclusions. Eighty-one percent of patients were satisfied with the results of surgery and 87.5% would choose to have the operation again if they had the choice. Decompressive laminectomy for DLSS yields best results if instrumented fusion is included in the procedure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ullrich CG, Binet EF, Sanecki MG et al. Quantitative assessment of the lumbar spinal canal by computed tomography. Radiology 1980; 134: 137– 9.

Strojnik T. Stenoza v lateralnem recesusu ledvene hrbtenice. Zdrav Vestn 1995; 64: 429–32.

Pavlovčič V. Zožitev ledvenega kanala (lumbalna stenoza). In: Pavlovčič V ed. Bolečina v križu. Ljubljana: Klinični center, Ortopedska klinika, 1997: 139–52.

Verbiest H. A radicular syndrome from development narrowing of the lumbar vertebral canal. J Bone Joint Surg 1954; 36: 230–7.

Fritz JM, Erhard RE, Vigrovic M. A nonsurgical treatment approach for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Phys Ther 1997; 77: 962–73.

Ganz JC. Lumbar spine stenosis: Postoperative results in terms of preoperative posture-related pain. J Neurosurg 1990; 72: 71–4.

Grob D, Humke T, Dvorak J. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: Decompression with or without arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg 1995; 77A: 1036–41.

Herkowitz HN. Lumbar spinal stenosis: Indications for arthrodesis and spinal instrumentation. Instr Course Lect 1997; 43: 425–33.

O’Leary PF, McCance SE. Distraction laminoplasty for decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop 2001; 384: 26–34.

Nasca RJ. Rationale for spinal fusion in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 1989; 14: 451–4.

Benz RJ, Garfin SR. Current techniques of decompression of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop 2001; 384: 75–81.

Hansraj KK, O’Leary PF, Cammisa FP et al. Decompression, fusion, and instrumentation surgery for complex lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop 2001; 384: 18–25.

Fujita T, Kostuik JP, Huckel CD et al. Complication of spinal fusion in adult patients more than 60 years of age. Orthop Clin North Am 1998; 29: 669–78.

Reeg SE. A review of comorbidities and spinal surgery. Clin Orthop 2001; 384: 101–9.

Stucki G, Daltroy L, Liang MH, Lipson SJ, Fosset AH, Katz JN. Measurement properties of a self-aministred outcome measure in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 1996; 21: 796–803.

Sheehan JM, Shaffrey CI, Jane JA. Degenerative lumbar stenosis: The neurosurgical perspective. Clin Orthop 2001; 384: 61–74.

Casper W, Papavero L, Sayler MK et al. Precise and limited decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Neurochir Wien 1994; 131: 130–6.

Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT. Degenerative lumbar spondylolysthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg 1991; 73A: 802–8.

Simmons ED, Simmons EH. Spinal stenosis with scoliosis. Spine 1992; 17: Suppl: S117–20.

Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolysthesis with spinal stenosis: A prospective randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without instrumentation. Spine 1997; 22: 2801–12.

Bruron J, Chazal J, Chirossel JP et al. When is spinal fusion warranted in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis? Rev Rhum Engl Ed 1996; 63: 44–50.

Conley FK, Cady CT, Liebreson RE. Decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis and stabilisation with Knodt rods in the eldery patient. Neurosurgery 1990; 26: 758–63.

Yone K, Sakou T, Kawauchi Y et al. Indication of fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis in eldery patients and its significance. Spine 1996; 21: 242–8.

Fox MW, Onofrio BM, Onofrio GV et al. Clinical outcomes and radiological instability following decompressive lumbar laminectomy for degenerative spinal stenosis. A comparison of patients undergoing concomitant arthrodesis versus decompression alone. J Neurosurg 1996; 83: 793–802.

Niggemeyer O, Strauss JM, Schulitz KP. Comparison of surgical procedures for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. A meta-analysis of the literature from 1975 to 1995. Eur Spine J 1997; 6: 423–9.

How to Cite
1.
Fokter S. OPERATIVE TREATMENT FOR DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 1 [cited 5Aug.2024];71(11). Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/1643
Section
Professional Article