Influenceof antimicrobial therapy on the sensitivity of legionella PCR - three case report
Abstract
Background: L. pneumophila is a possible causative agent of severe community and hospital acquired pneumonia. Available diagnostic tests have a lot of shortcomings. Detection of Legionella DNA with the PCR technique is a promissing new method allowing diagnosis within clinically useful time.
Methods: Three cases of severe Legionella pneumonia were followed with the PCR technique, urinary antigen and serologic methods.
Results: Diagnostic tests have different sensitivity and specificity and also different shortcomings. Serologic tests are unable to provide diagnosis within clinically useful time. Urinary antigen is specific just for L. pneumophila serotype 1. Antimicrobial treatment has impact on the sensitivity of Legionella PCR.
Conclusions: Detection of L. pneumophila infection with the PCR technique in addition to urinary antigen testing is likely to be the best diagnostic tool for the detection of all species within a time frame that will affect clinical management.
Downloads
References
Fields BS, Benson RF, Besser RE. Legionella and Legionnaires’ disease: 25 years of investigation. Clin Microbiol Rev 2002; 15: 506–26.
Murdoch DR. Diagnosis of Legionella infection. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36: 64–9.
Jaulhac B, Nowicki M, Bornstein N, Meunier O, Prevost G, Piemont I, et al. Detection of Legionella spp. in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids by DNA amplification. J Clin Microbiol 1992; 30: 920–4.
Jonas D, Rosenbaum A, Weyrich S, Bhakdi S. Enzyme-linked immunoassay for detection of PCR-amplified DNA of legionellae in bronchoalveolar fluid. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33: 1247–52.
Cloud JL, Caroll KC, Pixton P, Frali M, Hillyard DR. Detection of Legionella species in respiratory specimens using PCR with sequencing confirmation. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38: 1709–12.
Rantakokko-Jalava K, Jalava J. Development of conventional and real-time PCR assays for detection of Legionella DNA in respiratory specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39: 2904–10.
Reischl U, Linde HJ, Lehn N, Landt O, Barratt K, Wellinghausen N. Direct detection and differentiation of Legionella spp. and Legionella pneumophila in clinical specimens by dual-color real-time PCR and melting curve analysis. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 3814–7.
Templeton KE, Scheltinga SA, Sillekens P, Crielaard JW, van Dam AP, Goossens H, et al. Development and clinical evaluation of an internally controlled, single-tube multiplex real-time PCR assay for detection of Legionella pneumophila and other Legionella species. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41: 4016–21.
Haufroid V, Clippe A, Knoops B, Bernard A, Lison D. Genotyping in urine: an interesting tool for epidemiological studies. Clin Chem 1998; 44: 2210–1.
Lindsay DS, Abraham WH, Findlay W, Christie P, Johnston F, Edwards GF. Laboratory diagnosis of legionnaires’ disease due to Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1: comparison of phenotypic and genotypic methods. J Med Microbiol 2004; 53: 183–7.
Ramirez JA, Ahkee S, Tolentino A, Miller RD, Summersgill JT. Diagnosis of Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, or Chlamydia pneumoniae lower respiratory infection using the polymerase chain reaction on a single throat swab specimen. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1996; 24: 7–14.
Murdoch DR, Walford EJ, Jennings LC, Light GJ, Schousboe MI, Chereshsky AY, et al. Use of the polymerase chain reaction to detect Legionella DNA in urine and serum samples from patients with pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 1996; 23: 475–80.
Helbig JH, Engelstadter T, Maiwald M, Uldum SA, Witzleb W, Luck PC. Diagnostic relevance of the detection of Legionella DNA in urine samples by the polymerase chain reaction. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1999; 18: 716–22.
Murdoch DR, Jennings LC, Light GJ, Chambers ST. Detection of Legionella DNA in guinea pig peripheral leukocytes, urine and plasma by the polymerase chain reaction. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1999; 18: 445–7.
The Author transfers to the Publisher (Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal) all economic copyrights following form Article 22 of the Slovene Copyright and Related Rights Act (ZASP), including the right of reproduction, the right of distribution, the rental right, the right of public performance, the right of public transmission, the right of public communication by means of phonograms and videograms, the right of public presentation, the right of broadcasting, the right of rebroadcasting, the right of secondary broadcasting, the right of communication to the public, the right of transformation, the right of audiovisual adaptation and all other rights of the author according to ZASP.
The aforementioned rights are transferred non-exclusively, for an unlimited number of editions, for the term of the statutory
The Author can make use of his work himself or transfer subjective rights to others only after 3 months from date of first publishing in the journal Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal.
The Publisher (Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal) has the right to transfer the rights, acquired parties without explicit consent of the Author.
The Author consents that the Article be published under the Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 (attribution-non-commercial) or comparable licence.
