External cephalic version at Izola Maternity Hospital

  • Boštjan Lovšin Oddelek za ginekologijo in porodništvo, Splošna bolnišnica Izola, Polje 40, 6310 Izola
  • Mladen Mrkajić Oddelek za ginekologijo in porodništvo, Splošna bolnišnica Izola, Polje 40, 6310 Izola
  • Janja Zver-Skomina Oddelek za ginekologijo in porodništvo, Splošna bolnišnica Izola, Polje 40, 6310 Izola
  • Dušan Deisinger Oddelek za ginekologijo in porodništvo, Splošna bolnišnica Izola, Polje 40, 6310 Izola
Keywords: external cephalic version, caesarean section, breech presentation

Abstract

Background: Almost all babies in breech presentation at term are delivered by caesarean section. Professional guidelines recommend an attempt of external cephalic version to reduce breech presentations at birth and thus the proportion of caesareans. Our aim was to analyse the clinical and ultrasound factors to predict the outcome of version and check the hypothesis, if the implementation of the external cephalic version helps to reduce the number of caesareans.

Methods: The study included all attempts of external cephalic version after 36 weeks of pregnancy at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in Izola General Hospital from 2002 to 2010.

Results: 68/143 (47.6 %) external cephalic versions were successful. the success of intervention was mostly influenced by a greater amount of amniotic fluid, higher fetal position in the pelvis and transverse or oblique lie of the fetus. With 100 attempts of external cephalic version 32 caesareans were avoided or one cesarean per 3.1 attempts.

Conclusions: the study has confirmed that by performing external cephalic version the number of caesareans can be reduced. The proportion of successful versions was comparable to studies in the literature despite the minimal use of uterine muscle relaxants.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Pajntar M, Kavšek G. Medenična vstava. V: Pajntar M, Novak Antolič Ž, Lučovnik M eds. Nosečnost in vodenje poroda, 3., dopolnjena izd. Ljubljana: Društvo Medicinski razgledi; 2015. p. 319‒26.

RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 20a. External cephalic version and reducing the incidence of breech presentation. December 2006. Reviewed 2010[cited 22.06.2016]. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gt20aexternalceph alicversion.pdf.

Breech Delivery. In: Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, eds. Wiliams Obstetrics, 24 ed. New York: McGrawHill; 2015. p. 558‒73.

RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 20b. The management of Breech presentation. December 2006[cited 22.6.2016]. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg-no-20b-breech-presentation.pdf.

Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. The Lancet. 2000;356(9239):1375–83.

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 265: Mode of Term Singleton Breech Delivery. Obstetrics &Gynecology. 2001;98(6):1189–90.

Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah ME. Planned Caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; (1):CD000166.

Whyte H, Hannah ME, Saigal S, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K, et al. Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(3):864–71.

Premru-Sršen T. Term breech trial. The Lancet. 2001;357(9251):225–6.

Alarab M, Regan C, O’Connell MP, Keane DP, O’Herlihy C, Foley ME. Singleton vaginal breech delivery at term: still a safe option. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:407‒12.

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 340: Mode of Term Singleton Breech Delivery. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2006;108(1):235.

Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R, West HM. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 1;4:CD000083.

Lovšin B. Zunanji obrat na glavico – za. In: Novak-Antolič Ž, editor. Medenična vstava, večplodna nosečnost. 7. Novakovi dnevi. Zbornik prispevkov 14. strokovni sestanek ZPM; 19–20 maj 2006 maj; Otočec. Ljubljana: Združenje za perinatalno medicino; 2006. p. 44‒51.

Rizner T. Zunanji obrat. In: Pajntar M, Novak Antolič Ž, Lučovnik M eds. Nosečnost in vodenje poroda, 3., dopolnjena izd. Ljubljana: Društvo Medicinski razgledi; 2015. p. 327‒9.

Coco AS. External Cephalic Version. Pfenninger and Fowler’s Procedures for Primary Care: Elsevier BV; 2011. p. 1137–40.

Mrkajić M. Zunanji obrat ploda na glavico – zakaj da. Specialistično delo. Mentor: Lovšin B. V Ljubljani: Medicinska fakulteta, Katedra za ginekologijo in porodništvo; 2011.

Lunaček P. Vnanji obrat. In: Lunaček P. Porodniške operacije I. del. Ljubljana: Komus; 1950. p. 63‒7.

Rončevič L. Zunanji obrat. In: Zbornik predavanj Funkcionalno izobraževanje; 2003; Ljubljana. Ljubljana: Sekcija medicinskih sester babic; 2003. p. 62.

Protokol zunanjega obrata na glavico. Izola: Splošna bolnišnica Izola, Ginekološko porodniški oddelek; 2001.

Beuckens A, Rijnders M, Verburgt-Doeleman GHM, Rijninks-van Driel GC, Torpe J, Hutton EK. An observational study of the success and complications of 2546 external cephalic versions in low-risk pregnant women performed by trained midwives. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2015;123(3):415–23.

Grootscholten K, Kok M, Oei SG, Mol BW, van der Post JA. External cephalic version-related risks: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:1143‒51.

Indraccolo U, Graziani C, Di Iorio R, Corona G, Bonito M, Indraccolo SR. External cephalic version for singleton breech presentation: proposal of a practical check-list for obstetricians. European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. 2015;19(13):2340–53.

Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, van der Post J, Opmeer B, Mol BW. Clinical factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:630.e1‒7.

Ben-Meir A, Erez Y, Sela HY, Shveiky D, Tsafrir A, Ezra Y. Prognostic parameters for successful external cephalic version. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2008;21(9):660–2.

Kok M, van der Steeg J, van der Post J, Mol B. Prediction of Success of External Cephalic Version after 36 Weeks. American Journal of Perinatology. 2010;28(02):103–10.

Mowat A, Gardener G. Predictors of successful external cephalic version in an Australian maternity hospital. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2013;54(1):59–63.

Ebner F, Friedl TWP, Leinert E, Schramm A, Reister F, Lato K, et al. Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: a single centre experience. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2015;293(4):749–55.

Salzer L, Nagar R, Melamed N, Wiznitzer A, Peled Y, Yogev Y. Predictors of successful external cephalic version and assessment of success for vaginal delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015;28:49‒54.

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 265: Mode of Term Singleton Breech Delivery. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2001;98(6):1189–90.

Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, Van Der Post JA, Mol BW. Ultrasound factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009;33(1):76–84.

Burgos J, Rodríguez L, Cobos P, Osuna C, del Mar Centeno M, Larrieta R, et al. Management of breech presentation at term: a retrospective cohort study of 10 years of experience. Journal of Perinatology. 2015;35(10):803–8.

de Hundt M, Velzel J, de Groot CJ, Mol BW, Kok M. Mode of Delivery After Successful External Cephalic Version. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2014;123(6):1327–34.

Burgos J, Iglesias M, Pijoan JI, Rodriguez L, Fernández-Llebrez L, Martínez-Astorquiza T. Probability of cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2015;131(2):192–5.

Vlemmix F, Rosman AN, te Hoven S, van de Berg S, Fleuren MAH, Rijnders ME, et al. Implementation of External Cephalic Version in the Netherlands: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Birth. 2014;41(4):323–9.

ACOG practice patterns. External cephalic version. Number 4, July 1997. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1997;59(1):73–80.

Tan JM, Macario A, Carvalho B, Druzin ML, El-Sayed YY. Cost-effectiveness of external cephalic version for term breech presentation. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2010;10(1).

Bogner G, Hammer BE, Schausberger C, Fischer T, Reisenberger K, Jacobs V. Patient satisfaction with childbirth after external cephalic version. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2013;289(3):523-31.

Published
2017-06-04
How to Cite
1.
Lovšin B, Mrkajić M, Zver-Skomina J, Deisinger D. External cephalic version at Izola Maternity Hospital. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 4Jun.2017 [cited 28Mar.2024];86. Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/1711
Section
Original article