PATTERN ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY IN RELATION TO KINETIC AND STATIC PERIMETRY AND VISUAL ACUITY IN RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA
Abstract
Background. This study was conducted to assess whether pattern ERG is a sensitive test in evaluating the retinal function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. We wanted to determine how pattern ERG, reflecting the activity of inner retinal layers, is related to other psychophysical tests such as perimetry and visual acuity.
Methods. An analysis was performed on 50 eyes of 25 patients with typical rod-cone retinitis pigmentosa. The standard Snellen visual acuity was tested. Visual field sensitivity was measured with automated static perimetry (Octopus G2 program) where mean defect was taken as an index of visual field loss. In kinetic perimetry (Goldmann) the average radius of the visual field measured with target II/4 and V/4 was calculated. Transient pattern ERG and all five flash ERG responses were also measured according to ISCEV standards. Amplitudes of pattern ERG P50 and N95 waves were compared to results of visual acuity and visual field testing.
Results. In our group of 25 RP patients with visual acuity ranging from 0.16 to 1.0, PERG responses were preserved much better than full field ERGs. 72% of them had still recordable PERG responses, while 48% had cone and only 32% maximal responses. Scotopic rod responses were extinguished in all eyes. The normalized amplitudes of the PERG responses were also much higher (43.5%) than cone (22.5%) or maximal responses (4.5%). A strong correlation of both P50 and N95 amplitudes with Octopus mean defect index was found. In kinetic perimetry the correlation with PERG amplitudes was also high, but it was better with II/4 than with V/4 target. Patients with high preserved ERG responses had good visual acuity. In all patients with visual acuity less than 0.4 both flash and pattern ERG responses were already absent.
Conclusions. This study shows that pattern ERG is an objective and sensitive test in evaluating the functional visual loss in retinitis pigmentosa. Amplitudes of P50 and N95 responses are linearly related to the remaining functional retina. The agreement is more pronounced in static than kinetic perimetry. Visual acuity affects the pattern ERG more than flash ERG.
Downloads
References
Heckenlively JR, Arden GB eds. Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision. St. Louis: Mosby, 1991.
Maffei L, Fiorentini A. Electroretinographic responses to alternating gratings before and after section of the optic nerve. Science 1981; 211: 953–5.
Fishman GA, Sokol S. The electroretinogram in retinal disease. In: Electrophysiologic testing in disorders of the retina, optic nerve and visual pathway. American Academy of Ophthalmology, 1990: 25–7.
Holder GE. Significance of abnormal pattern electroretinography in anterior visual pathway dysfunction. Brit J Ophthalmol 1997; 71: 166–71.
Dodt E. The electrical response of the human eye to patterned stimuli: Clinical observations. Doc Ophthalmol 1987; 65: 271–86.
Hawlina M. Clinical application of retinal and cortical evoked potentials. Neurologija 1990; 39: Suppl I: 211–24.
Fahle M, Steuhl KP, Aulhorn E. Correlations between electroretinography, morphology and function in retinitis pigmentosa. Graefes Archive for Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology 1991; 229 (1): 37–49.
Yagasaki K, Jacobson SG, Apathy PP, Knighton RW. Rod and cone psychophysics and electroretinography: Methods for comparison in retinal degenerations. Doc Ophth 1988; 69: 121–30.
Niemayer G, Gurewitsch K. Variabilität von Visus, Dunkeladaption und Elektroretinogramm bei Retinitis pigmentosa. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1982; 180: 401–4.
Iannaccone A, Rispoli E, Vingolo EM, Onori P, Steindl K, Rispoli D, Pannarale MR. Correlation between Goldmann perimetry and maximal electroretinogram response in retinitis pigmentosa. Documenta Ophthalmologica 1995; 90 (2): 129–42.
Sandberg MA, Weigel-DiFranco C, Rosner B, Berson EL. The relationship between visual field size and electroretinogram amplitude in retinitis pigmentosa. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 1996; 37 (8): 1693–8.
Marmor MF, Zrenner E. Standard for clinical electroretinography. Documenta Ophthalmologica 1995; 89: 199–210.
Marmor MF, Zrenner E. Pattern ERG – ISCEV standards. Documenta Ophthalmologica 1995/1996; 91: 291–8.
Hawlina M. Pattern Electroretinography with the New HK-Loop Electrode. Chibret International Journal of Ophthalmology 1993; 9 (3): 51–8.
Berson LE. Retinitis pigmentosa. The Friedenwald Lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993; 34: 1659–76.
Pagon RA. Retinitis pigmentosa. Major review. Survey Ophthalmol 1988; 33: 137–77.
Berson EL. Visual function testing: clinical correlations. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 1994; 11 (5): 472–81.
Stone JL, Barlow WE, Humayun MS, de Juan E Jr., Milam AH. Morphometric analysis of macular photoreceptors and ganglion cells in retinas with retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110 (11): 1634–9.
Santos A, Humayun MS, de Juan E Jr., Greenburg RJ, Marsh MJ, Klock IB, Milam AH. Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa. A morphometric analysis. Arch Ophthalmol 1997; 115 (4): 511–5.
Grover S, Fishman GA, Anderson RJ, Alexander KR, Derlacki DJ. Rate of visual field loss in retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology 1997; 104 (3): 460–5, 1997 Mar.
Falsini B, Iarossi G, Porciatti V, Merendino E, Fadda A, Cermola S, Buzzonetti L. Postreceptoral contribution to macular dysfunction in retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994; 35: 4282–90.
The Author transfers to the Publisher (Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal) all economic copyrights following form Article 22 of the Slovene Copyright and Related Rights Act (ZASP), including the right of reproduction, the right of distribution, the rental right, the right of public performance, the right of public transmission, the right of public communication by means of phonograms and videograms, the right of public presentation, the right of broadcasting, the right of rebroadcasting, the right of secondary broadcasting, the right of communication to the public, the right of transformation, the right of audiovisual adaptation and all other rights of the author according to ZASP.
The aforementioned rights are transferred non-exclusively, for an unlimited number of editions, for the term of the statutory
The Author can make use of his work himself or transfer subjective rights to others only after 3 months from date of first publishing in the journal Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal.
The Publisher (Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal) has the right to transfer the rights, acquired parties without explicit consent of the Author.
The Author consents that the Article be published under the Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 (attribution-non-commercial) or comparable licence.
