COOPERATION BETWEEN FAMILY DOCTORS AND SPECIALISTS AT VARIOUS LEVELS OF HEALTH CARE

  • Nena Kopčavar-Guček Zdravstveni zavod Zdravje Smoletova 18 1000 Ljubljana
Keywords: primary care, referrals, medical documentation, satisfaction, quality

Abstract

Background. Progress of medical science, development of new technologies and new medications, aging of population, limited sources, increasing health – consciousness and demands of the population require new approaches to the organisation of health – care. Besides all activities which protect and preserve health of an individual, health care integrates several other activities, including the care at various levels. All health care activities in Slovenia, at primary and also at secondary and tertiary level have increased significantly in the past decade. The characteristics of overload at various levels vary significantly and should be analysed separately. A critical view of the present state of art may render possibilities for better access, decreased working load and include the efforts for maintaining on even improving the quality of primary health care. Moreover, it is absolutely necessary as a solid foundation for cooperation with care providers at higher levels. New communication technologies offer new possibilities for communication between doctors at various levels of health care. Health reforms, transformations of health care system, new clinical guidelines and recommendations facilitate more rational healthcare and its higher quality. Collecting data on patient satisfaction, or their perception of quality of health care, beside standardized predictors of quality and pear monitoring enable feedback information for the health providers, which is essential.

Conclusions. Increasing demand of the patients at all levels of health care is overloading the normal functioning and demands change in the health care system. The central, »gate keeper« role of the family practitioner coordinates treatment on the same level and offers possibility of referring to secondary and tertiary level. New organisation skills, modern means of communication, follow – up of quality and satisfaction surveys should decrease the burden of doctors, improve the access to health care and enable its higher quality. Besides better education, all providers of health care will invest greater personal efforts, and improve their effectiveness and communication skills. There is no doubt all providers of health care should have a common goal: providing the care for ill people of the highest quality possible.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Zdravstveni statistični letopis 2001. Ljubljana: Inštitut za varovanje zdravja RS, 2003.

Poročilo OECD za leto 2000.

Keber D. Reformi na pot. Julija 2003.

HFA kazalniki, aplikacija na http://www.who.dk, dostop do podatkov januar 2003.

ZIS Bolnišničnih obravnav (bolezni, poškodbe, zastrupitve), Ljubljana: Inštitut za varovanje zdravja RS, 2001.

Švab I. Primary health care reform in Slovenia: first results. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 141–4.

WHO Regional office for Europe. Targets for health for all. The health policy for Europe. Summary of the Updated Edition. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 1992: 1–38.

Williamson JW. Illnes and challenges in quality assurance of health care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 1994; 6: 5–15.

Erekiel EJ, Nevelof Dubler N. Preserving the physician-patient relationship in era of maraged care. JAMA 1995; 273: 323–9.

Brody H. Quality and health care reform. J Form Practice 1994; 39: 423–6.

Kersnik J. Developing national policy on quality in health care in Slovenia: Implications for general practice. Audit Tends 1996; 4: 151–4.

Kelson M. Consumer involvement initiatives in clinical audit and outcomes. A review of developments and usies in the identifications of good practice. London: Department of Health Clinical outcomes Group, 1995: 1–62.

Kersnik J. Patients’ satisfaction with family practice: comparison between Europa and Slovenia. Zdrav Vestn 2000; 69: 5–10.

Gordon J, Kearney M, Watson P. Medical records in general practice. The Medical Journal of Australia 1992; 156: 701–9.

Kersnik J, Švab I. Predlog novega zdravstvenega kartona. Zdrav Vars 1996; 35: 193–9.

Liaw TS. Information management in primary medical care in South Australia. Fam Practice 1994; 11: 44–50.

Selbman HK, Pietsch Breitfeld B. Hospital information systems and quality assurance. Quality Assurance in Health Care 1990; 2: 335–44.

Wyatt JC. Clinical data system. Part 1: Data and medical records. Lancet 1994; 344: 1534–7.

Wyatt JC. Clinical data system. Part 3: Development and evaluation. Lancet 1994; 344: 1682–8.

Stephenson B, Rowe BH, Haynes B, Madraria WM, Levn G. Is this patients taking the treatment as perscribed? JAMA 1993; 269: 2779–81.

Majeed A, Gray J, Ambler G, Conroll K, Birdman AB. Association between practical size and quality of care of patient’s with ischaemic heart disease: cross sectional study. BMJ 2003, 326: 371–2.

Brook RH, Komberg CJ, McGlynn EA. Health system reform and quality. JAMA 1996; 276: 476–7.

Paterson C. Measuring outcomes in primary care: SF-36 health survey. BMJ 1996; 312: 1016–20.

Hiortdahl, Laerum E. Continuity of care in general practice: effect on patient satisfaction. BMJ 1992; 304: 1287–90.

How to Cite
1.
Kopčavar-Guček N. COOPERATION BETWEEN FAMILY DOCTORS AND SPECIALISTS AT VARIOUS LEVELS OF HEALTH CARE. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 1 [cited 5Aug.2024];72(11). Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/1880
Section
Review