EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE – I. GENERAL PRINCIPLES
Abstract
Background. Evidence-based medicine is a method that helps physicians find and critically evaluate evidences from the medical literature, and apply the evidences in clinical decision-making. In clinical practice the method supplements core medical skills, clinical experience and emphasizes the importance of clinical research evidence. Evidencebased medicine is characterised by two fundamental principles: first, the scientific evidences alone do not suffice for clinical decision-making, second, clinical decision-making is being guided by scientific evidence placed in appropriate hierarchy. For practicing evidence-based medicine additional skills are needed which are generally not part of medical curricula. Physician should be able to formulate a clear clinical question from a patient’s problem and determine what information is required. He should be able to search the literature efficiently, critically appraise the evidence from the literature and properly implement the findings in clinical problem-solving.
Conclusions. Evidence-based medicine has been widely accepted in academic medical circles as well as in clinical practice. It is being introduced in curricula of several medical schools, especially as a supplement to clinical skills on different levels of medical studies.
Introduction of evidence-based medicine into clinical practice increased the possibility to critically introduce current research findings from medical literature to everyday work of physicians in their care for patients.
Downloads
References
Weingart O. Evidenzbasierte Medizin – Grundlage ärztlichen Handelns. Dt Ärztebl 2002; 99: A2685–6.
Guyatt GH, Drummond R. User’s guides to medical literature. J Am Med Assoc 1993; 270: 2096–7.
Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine: a new approach to the teaching of medicine. J Am Med Assoc 1992; 268: 2420–5.
Williams JK. Understanding evidence-based medicine: A primer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 275–8.
Anon. How to read clinical journals: I. Why to read them and how to start reading them critically. Can Med Assoc J 1981;124: 555–8.
Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. Brit Med J 1996; 312: 71–2.
Guyatt GH. Evidence-based medicine. ACP Journal Club 1991; 114: A–16.
Poredoš P, Šabovič M. Strokovne podlage za razvrščanje zdravil glede na učinkovitost. Zdrav Vestn 2000; 69: I–15–7.
Komadina R, Rok-Simon M. Desetletje gibal 2000–2010 pod okriljem Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije. Zdrav Vestn 2001; 70: 493–5.
Fuerst J. Odmev na članek »Zdravljenje rezistentnih depresij in primer uspešne uporabe donepezil HCl v njihovi obravnavi«. Zdrav Vestn 2002; 71: 115–5.
Švab I, Car J. Znanstveno utemeljena medicina v družinski oz. splošni medicini = Evidence based medicine in family medicine. Zdrav Varstvo 1999; 38: 295–7.
Car J, Švab I, Rotar-Pavlič D. Znanstveno utemeljena družinska medicina. In: Kersnik J ed. Znanstveno utemeljena medicina (Zbirka PiP). Ljubljana: Združenje zdravnikov družinske medicine, Slovensko zdravniško društvo, 2000: 1–8.
Švab I, Kersnik J. Kako ocenjujemo strokovno literaturo? In: Kersnik J ed. Znanstveno utemeljena medicina (Zbirka PiP). Ljubljana: Združenje zdravnikov družinske medicine, Slovensko zdravniško društvo, 2000: 33–46.
Kersnik J, Švab I. Ocenjevanje in nadzor kakovosti s pomočjo dokazov. In: Kersnik J ed. Znanstveno utemeljena medicina (Zbirka PiP). Ljubljana: Združenje zdravnikov družinske medicine, Slovensko zdravniško društvo, 2000: 59–68.
Petek D, Kopčavar-Guček N, Švab I. Znanstveno utemeljena družinska medicina. Zdrav Vestn 2001; 70: 235–7.
Grad A. Nekaj o »Evidence-based medicine«. Isis 1999; 8: 108–8.
Vlaisavljević V, Gorišek B, Borko E. Centru za menopavzo na pot. Zdrav Vestn 2002; 71: Suppl I: I-1–39.
Deffner H. Pomen in vloga inovacij v farmacevtskih raziskavah. Isis 2002; 11: 54–5.
Cochrane Collaboration – spletna stran
http://www.cochrane.org. Dostop: 4. 9. 2003.
Hill GB. Archie Cochrane and his legacy. An internal challenge to physician’s autonomy. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 52: 1189–92.
Levin A. The Cochrane Collaboration. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135: 309–12.
MacAuley D. READER: An acronym to aid critical reading in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 1994; 44: 83–5.
MacAuley D, McCrum E. Critical appraisal using the READER method: a workshop-based controlled trial. Fam Pract 1999; 16: 90–3.
MacAuley D, McCrum E, Brown C. Randomised controlled trial of the READER method of critical appraisal in general practice. Brit Med J 1998; 316: 1134–7.
Slawson DC, Shaughnessy AF, Bennett JH. Becoming a medical information master: feeling good about not knowing everything. J Fam Pract 1994; 38: 505–13.
Slawson DC, Shaughnessy AF. Obtaining useful information from expert based sources. Br Med J 1997; 314: 947–9.
Geymann JP. POEMs as a paradigm shift in teaching, learning, and clinical practice. J Fam Med 1999; 48: 343–4.
Slawson DC, Shaughnessy AF, Allen F. Becoming and information master: using POEMs to change practice with confidence. J Fam Pract 2000; 49: 63– 7.
Smith R. A POEM a week for the BMJ. Br Med J 2002; 325: 983–3.
Haynes RB, Sackett DL, Gray JM, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH. Transferring evidence from research into practice: 1. The role of clinical care research evidence in clinical decisions. ACP J Club 1996; 125: A14–6.
Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Sinclair JC, Hayward R, Cook DJ, Cook RJ. Users’ guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. J Am Med Assoc 1995; 274: 1800–4.
Jadadd AR ed. Randomised controlled trials: A user’s guide. London, BMJ Books, 1998: 7.
Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ. Users’ guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? J Am Med Assoc 1993; 270: 2598–601.
Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ. Users’ guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? J Am Med Assoc 1994; 271: 59–63.
Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users’ guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about an diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? J Am Med Assoc 1994; 271: 389–91.
Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users’ guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about an diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? J Am Med Assoc 1994; 271: 703–7.
Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: The basics of evidence based medicine. London, BMJ Publishing Group, 1997: XV–XV.
Cowan FM. Evidence-based medicine: an overview. Int J STD & Aids 1999; 10: 5–7.
Bigby M. Evidence-based medicine in a nutshell: a guide to finding and using the best evidence in caring for patients. Arch Dermatol 1998; 134: 1609–18.
Neely JG, Hartman JM, Wallace MS. Building the powerful 10-minute office visit: Part II. Beginning a critical literature review. Laryngoscope 2001; 111: 70–6.
Oxman AD, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH. Users’ guides to the medical literature. I. How to get started. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. J Am Med Assoc 1993; 270: 2093–5.
Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Nishikawa J, Hayward RS. The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club 1995; 123: A12–3.
Deveraux PJ, Manns BJ, Ghali WA, Quan H, Guyatt GH. Reviewing the reviewers: the quality of reporting in three secondary journals. Can Med Assoc J 2001; 164: 1573–6.
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Phillips AN. Meta-analysis: principles and procedures. Brit Med J 1997; 315: 1533–7.
Egger M, Davey Smith G. Meta-analysis: potentials and promise. Brit Med J 1997; 315: 1371–4.
Sackett DL, Straus SE. Finding and applying evidence during clinical rounds: the ‘evidence cart’. J Am Med Assoc 1998; 280: 1336–8.
Bexon N, Falzon L. Personal reflections on the role of librarians in the teaching of evidence-based healthcare. Health Information and Libraries Journal 2003; 20: 112–5.
Bradley DR, Kaur Rana G, Martin PW, Schumacher RE. Real-time, evidencebased medicine instruction: a randomized controlled trial in a neonative intensive care unit. J Med Libr Assoc 2002; 90: 194–201.
Scherrer CS, Dorsch JL. The evolving role of the librarian in evidence-based medicine. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1999; 87: 322–8.
Beverly CA, Booth A, Bath PA. The role of information specialist in the systematic review process: a health information case study. Health Information and Libraries Journal 2003; 20: 65–74.
Davidoff F, Florance V. The informationist: a new health profession? Ann Intern Med 2000; 132: 996–8.
Guyatt GH, Rennie D eds. User’s guides to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. Chicago, American Medical Association, 2002: 7, 25, 49.
Earl-Slater A. Critical appraisal and hierarchies of the evidence. Brit J Clin Governance 2001; 6: 59–63.
Norman GR, Shannon SI. Effectiveness of instruction in critical appraisal (evidence-based medicine) skills: a critical appraisal. Can Med Assoc J 1998; 158: 177–81.
Haynes RB, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH. Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice. Evidence Based Medicine 2002; 7: 36–8.
The Author transfers to the Publisher (Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal) all economic copyrights following form Article 22 of the Slovene Copyright and Related Rights Act (ZASP), including the right of reproduction, the right of distribution, the rental right, the right of public performance, the right of public transmission, the right of public communication by means of phonograms and videograms, the right of public presentation, the right of broadcasting, the right of rebroadcasting, the right of secondary broadcasting, the right of communication to the public, the right of transformation, the right of audiovisual adaptation and all other rights of the author according to ZASP.
The aforementioned rights are transferred non-exclusively, for an unlimited number of editions, for the term of the statutory
The Author can make use of his work himself or transfer subjective rights to others only after 3 months from date of first publishing in the journal Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal.
The Publisher (Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal) has the right to transfer the rights, acquired parties without explicit consent of the Author.
The Author consents that the Article be published under the Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 (attribution-non-commercial) or comparable licence.
