Effect of low-dose epidural parturition analgesy on continuation and outcome of labour
Abstract
Background: Epidural parturition analgesia (EPA) is commonly employed technique of providing pain relief during labour. The newer form of low-dose intermittent EPA has been in the recent studies presented as solid, according to parturitient’s wish. The main goal of our review was to strenghten the influence of this form of EPA on continuation, mode and outcome of labour.
Methods: We have retrospectively analysed all the labours in years 2005 and 2006 in nulliparous women in labour at term with the head presentation of fetus. They were divided in two groups – with and without EPA. Analgetic mixture of EPA contained 0.1 % bupivacain and 2 µg of phentanyl/mL of local anesthetic. Main features of parturitients, duration of labour and outcomes of labour on mother and newborn were compared. We have excluded all labours with fetal breech presentation, multiple pregnancies, elective caesarean sections and all labours finished before 37th week of pregnancy.
Results: In nulliparous women with low-dose intermittent EPA labour was a bit longer and often finished with vacuum extraction. However level of caesarean sections was unchanged. In comparision with group without EPA the outcomes in newborns were not essentially different.
Conclusions: Use of low-dose intermittent EPA is acceptable and safe method of decreasing the labour pains, ensuring good outcomes in mother and newborn despite higher risk.
Downloads
References
Eltzschig HK, Lieberman HK, Camman WR. Regional anesthesia and analgesia for labor and delivery. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 319–32.
Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) Study Group UK. Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2001; 358: 19–23.
Lewis M, Calthorpe N. Combinet spinal epidural analgesia in labour. Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review 2005; 16: II-29–50.
Liu EHG, Sia ATH. Rates of cesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery in nulliparous women after low concentration epidural infusions or opioid analgesia: systematic review. BMJ 2004; 328: 1410.
Ministrstvo za zdravje Republike Slovenije, Inštitut za varovanje zdravja RS. Perinatalni informacijski sistem Slovenije. Primerjava podatkov med regijami in porodnišnicami za leto 2000. Zdrav Var 2002; 41 Supl 5: –
Littleford J. Effects on the fetus and newborn of maternal analgesia and anesthesia: a review. Can J Anesth 2004; 6: 586–609.
Wong CA, Scavone BM, Peaceman AM, et al. The risk of cesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia given early versus late in labor. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 655–65.
Halpern SH, et al. Effect of epidural vs. parenteral opioid analgesia on the progress of labor. JAMA 1998; 280: 2105–10.
Zhang J, et al. Epidural analgesia in association with duration of labor and mode of delivery: a quantitative review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 970–7.
Salim R, Nadum Z, Moscivici R, Lavee M, Shala E. Continous compared with intermittent epidural infusion on progress of labor and patient satisfaction. Obstet Gyn 2005; 106: 301–6.
Reš-Muravec U, Pleško-Mlakar A, Stopar T, Grmek S, Likar R, Jordan T, et al. Naše izkušnje z epiduralno porodno analgezijo. Zdrav Vestn 2003; 72 Supl II: 189–94.
Uranjek J, Juvan-Kramer K. Vpliv različnih koncentracij bupivakaina in levobupivakaina s fentanilom na potek poroda v epiduralni analgeziji: retrospektivni pregled. Zdrav Vestn 2006; 75: 787–93.
Lieberman E, et al. Changes in fetal position during labor and their association with epidural analgesia. Am Coll Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 974–82.
Howell CJ. Epidural versus non-epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour: Cochrane review. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2003. Oxford: Update Software.
The Author transfers to the Publisher (Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal) all economic copyrights following form Article 22 of the Slovene Copyright and Related Rights Act (ZASP), including the right of reproduction, the right of distribution, the rental right, the right of public performance, the right of public transmission, the right of public communication by means of phonograms and videograms, the right of public presentation, the right of broadcasting, the right of rebroadcasting, the right of secondary broadcasting, the right of communication to the public, the right of transformation, the right of audiovisual adaptation and all other rights of the author according to ZASP.
The aforementioned rights are transferred non-exclusively, for an unlimited number of editions, for the term of the statutory
The Author can make use of his work himself or transfer subjective rights to others only after 3 months from date of first publishing in the journal Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal.
The Publisher (Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal) has the right to transfer the rights, acquired parties without explicit consent of the Author.
The Author consents that the Article be published under the Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 (attribution-non-commercial) or comparable licence.
