Treatment of newly diagnosed patients with myasthenia gravis at a regional hospital in years 2003–2013

  • Mateja Baruca Klinični oddelek za bolezni živčevja Nevrološka klinika UKC Ljubljana
  • Anton Grad Splošna bolnica Izola Nevrološka dejavnost Polje 40 6310 Izola
Keywords: myasthenia gravis, neuromuscular junction, treatment, epidemiology, prognosis

Abstract

Background: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is the most common autoimmune disorders of the neuromuscular junction. Advances in intensive care in conjunction with the advent of novel treatments have made MG one of the most treatable neurological disorders. The incidence and prevalence rates of MG have increased over time due to greater disease awareness, better diagnostic methods and ageing of the population. Due to these facts, the number of MG patients evaluated at the secondarylevel regional hospitals has increased. So far, no data on the evaluation of MG in Slovenia have been systematically collected. The aim and scope of this article is to present the analysis of the evaluation of newly diagnosed MG patients at the General hospital of Isola for the time period between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2013.

Methods: We reviewed medical files of MG patients diagnosed at the General hospital of Isola in the above mentioned time period and collected data on patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics in addition to examining their clinical course and treatment outcome.

Results: Twenty-nine patients were identified (14 women, 15 men). Te mean age at disease onset was 59.4 ± 21.2 years for women and 56.3 ± 19.8 years for men. In the study population, 58.6 % of the patients were acetylcholine receptor antibody positive. Besides MG, patients most often had thyroid and other chronic diseases. Most patients (68.9 %) presented with extraocular disease symptoms, which progressed to generalized disease in 65 % of cases. Myasthenic crisis occurred in 10.3 % of patients. In 68.9 % of cases, the patients were treated exclusively with symptomatic therapy. Tymectomy was performed in 13.7 % of cases. On treatment, 13.7 % achieved a stable complete remission of MG symptoms, in 55 % the condition substantially improved, in 20.6 % improvement was only partial, and in 6.8 % of patients the condition remained unchanged. The fiveyear mortality of the study population, estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier method was 13.5 %.

Conclusions: With the exception of a higher mortality rate, the patients’ characteristics and clinical course of the disease were similar to data reported in other epidemiological studies. The patients’ higher mortality rate was considered to be a consequence of the lack of intensive treatment in patients with myasthenic crisis due to the unawareness of the reversibility of the condition with an adequate treatment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Mateja Baruca, Klinični oddelek za bolezni živčevja Nevrološka klinika UKC Ljubljana
Klinični oddelek za bolezni živčevja, Nevrološka klinika, UKC Ljubljana

References

Verschuuren JJGM, Palace J, Erik Gilhus N. Clinical aspects of myasthenia explained. Autoimmunity. 2010;43(5–6):344–52.

Grob D, Brunner N, Namba T, Pagala M. Lifetime course of myasthenia gravis. Muscle & Nerve. 2008;37(2):141–9.

Gilhus NE, Owe JF, Hoff JM, Romi F, Skeie GO, Aarli JA. Myasthenia Gravis: A Review of Available Treatment Approaches. Autoimmune Diseases. 2011;2011:1–6.

Daroff RB, Fenichel GM, Jankovic J, Mazziotta JC. Preface. Neurology in Clinical Practice: Elsevier BV; 2012. p. xiv-xv.

Jacob S, Viegas S, Lashley D, Hilton-Jones D. Myasthenia gravis and other neuromuscular junction disorders. Practical Neurology. 2009;9(6):364–71.

Sathasivam S. Diagnosis and management of myasthenia gravis. Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry. 2014;18(1):6–14.

Rowin J. Approach to the patient with suspected myasthenia gravis or ALS. Continuum: Lifelong Learning in Neurology. 2009;15:13–34.

Meriggioli MN, Sanders DB. Autoimmune myasthenia gravis: emerging clinical and biological heterogeneity. The Lancet Neurology. 2009;8(5):475–90.

Gilhus NE, Skeie GO, Romi F, Lazaridis K, Zisimopoulou P, Tzartos S. Myasthenia gravis — autoantibody characteristics and their implications for therapy. Nature Reviews Neurology. 2016;12(5):259–68.

Gilhus NE, Verschuuren JJ. Myasthenia gravis: subgroup classifcation and therapeutic strategies. The Lancet Neurology. 2015;14(10):1023–36.

Jayam Trouth A, Dabi A, Solieman N, Kurukumbi M, Kalyanam J. Myasthenia Gravis: A Review. Autoimmune Diseases. 2012;2012:1–10.

Hoffmann S, Kohler S, Ziegler A, Meisel A. Glucocorticoids in myasthenia gravis–if, when, how, and how much? Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 2014;130(4):211–21.

Pakzad Z, Aziz T, Oger J. Increasing incidence of myasthenia gravis among elderly in British Columbia, Canada. Neurology. 2011;76(17):1526–8.

Heldal AT, Owe JF, Gilhus NE, Romi F. Seropositive myasthenia gravis: A Nationwide epidemiologic study. Neurology. 2009;73(2):150–1.

Andersen JB, Engeland A, Owe JF, Gilhus NE. Myasthenia gravis requiring pyridostigmine treatment in a national population cohort. European Journal of Neurology. 2010;17(12):1445–50.

Pallaver F, Riviera AP, Piffer S, Ricciardi R, Roni R, Orrico D, et al. Change in Myasthenia Gravis Epidemiology in Trento, Italy, afer Twenty Years. Neuroepidemiology. 2011;36(4):282–7.

Published
2017-06-05
How to Cite
1.
Baruca M, Grad A. Treatment of newly diagnosed patients with myasthenia gravis at a regional hospital in years 2003–2013. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 5Jun.2017 [cited 19Apr.2024];86. Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/1937
Section
Original article