Connection between individual evaluation systems to determin the successfulness of acl reconstruction

  • Teodor Pevec
  • Matjaž Veselko
  • Vladimir Smrkolj
Keywords: anterior cruiciate ligament, reconstruction, evaluation system, statistics

Abstract

Background: The authors want to find correlation between ACL reconstruction results determined with various evaluation systems.

Patients and methods: The authors evaluated the end result with 55 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with posteriorly limited notchplasty using the patellar tendon graft with its bony attachments. Clinical results were based upon the IKDC and Lysholm rating scales, follow-up of pre-injury activity level, readiness for equal secondary procedures and side-to-side arthrometric testing of ligamentous laxity. We observed the correlation between various evaluation systems with the help of statistical methods.

Results: We determined the correlation between the Lysholm and IKDC rating scale, arthrometric testing of ligamentous laxity, and preparedness for equal secondary procedure in exception to pre-injury activity level. Laxity results were in correlation to the Lysholm and IKDC rating scale, modified activity level in exception for preparedness for equal secondary procedure. The results of preparedness for equal secondary procedure were in correlation to the Lysholm and IKDC rating scale in exception for arthrometric testing of ligamentous laxity and modified activity level. The modified activity level was in correlation only to arthrometric testing of ligamentous laxity.

Conclusions: Although a high comparison between most (6/10 combinations) evaluation systems was recorded, we believe that the result of ACL reconstruction successfulness is based upon the calculation of all evaluation methods. The final evaluation should include the degree of activity in regard to pre-injury condition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hefti F, Müller W. Heutiger Stand der Evaluation von Kniebandläsionen. Der neue IKDC-Knie-Evaluationsblatt. Orthopäde 1993; 22: 351–62.

Risberg MA, Holm I, Steen H, Beynnon BD. Sensitivity to changes over time for the IKDC form, the Lysholm score, and the Cincinnati knee score. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1999; 7: 152–9.

Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Evaluation of the knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 1982; 10(3): 150– 4.

Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating system in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Ortop 1985; 118: 43–9.

Heier KA, Mack DR, Moseley B, Russell P. An analysis of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in middle-aged patients. Am J Sports Med 1997; 25: 527–53.

Sernert N, Kartus J, Köhler K, Stener S, Larsson J, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J. Analysis of subjective, objective and functional examination tests after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1999; 7: 160–5.

Hrubesch R, Rangger C, Reichkendler M, Sailer RF, Gloetzer W, Eibl G. Comparison of score evaluatios and instrumented measurement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28(6): 850–6.

How to Cite
1.
Pevec T, Veselko M, Smrkolj V. Connection between individual evaluation systems to determin the successfulness of acl reconstruction. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 1 [cited 5Aug.2024];74(2). Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/2092
Section
Professional article