Comparison of optic nerve head topography in normal eyes using confocal laser scanning tomograph and retinal thickness analyzer

  • Andreja Rekič
  • Barbara Cvenkel
Keywords: Heidelberg retina tomograph, limits of agreement, optic nerve head, repeatability, retinal thickness analyser

Abstract

Background: To compare optic nerve head topography measurements by Heidelberg retina tomograph I (HRT) and retinal thickness analyser (RTA) and thereby to determine clinical agreement between the devices. To investigate reproducibility of measurements for HRT and RTA. To obtain our own HRT and RTA database for comparison of healthy and glaucomatous eyes.

Methods: The study included 100 normal eyes of 50 white adults of both sexes (mean age of 55.5 [SD 9.5] years). Ophthalmologic examination, fundus photography, HRT and RTA examinations were performed. To determine reproducibility 10 volunteers repeated the examination after a week. For HRT and RTA measurements mean (SD), median, 5th and 95th percentile, range and coefficient of variation were calculated. Differences in topographic parameters between HRT and RTA were tested for significance. Clinical agreement was assessed with »limits of agreement« and reproducibility expressed by repeatability coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: Significant differences (p < 0.05) in topographic parameters obtained by HRT and RTA were observed for all parameters except for rim area (p = 0.051) and height variation contour (p = 0.054). Limits of agreement between HRT and RTA were too wide and clinically important. Repeatability coefficient was good (< 0.10) for all HRT parameters except for RNFL cross-sectional area (0.28). Repeatability coefficient was > 0.10 for RTA parameters cup area (0.15), rim area (0.19), maximum cup depth (0.13), height variation contour (0.11) and RNFL cross-sectional area (0.14). ICC was good (> 90%) for all parameters, except for mean RNFL thickness (89%) for HRT and height variation contour (84%) for RTA.

Conclusions: The two devices cannot be used interchangeably. At present, clinical usefulness of HRT is superior to RTA due to better reproducibility of measurements, better software support, shorter duration of the examination and good comparability of our HRT database with the database included in the latest HRT software version. At the moment RTA is using the same database as HRT. Therefore, our RTA database provides a new basis for comparison of optic disc characteristics between healthy and glaucomatous eyes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sommer A, Katz J, Quigley HA, Miller NR, Robin AL, Richter RC, et al. Clinically detectable nerve fiber atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 1991; 109: 77–83.
Greenfield DS. Optic nerve and retinal nerve fiber layer analyzers in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2002; 13: 68–76.
Harju M, Vesti E. Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy of the optic nerve head in exfoliation glaucoma and ocular hypertension with exfoliation syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: 297–303.
Jonas JB, Mardin CY, Gründler AE. Comparison of measurements of neuroretinal rim area between confocal laser scanning tomography and planimetry of photographs. Br J Ophthalmol 1998; 82: 362–6.
Schuman JS, Kim J. Glaucoma diagnosis and management. Imaging of the optic nerve head and nerve fiber layer in glaucoma. Ophthalmol Clin N Am 2000; 13: 383–406.
Mikelberg FS. Ophthalmic imaging and diagnostics. Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy of the optic disc in glaucoma with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Ophthalmol Clin N Am 1998; 11: 435–44.
Janknecht P, Funk J. Optic nerve head analyser and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph: accuracy and reproducibility of topographic measurements in a model eye and volunteers. Br J Ophthalmol 1994; 78: 760–8.
Zeimer R, Shahidi M, Mori M, Zou S, Asrani S. A new method for rapid mapping of the retinal thickness at the posterior pole. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996; 37: 1994–2001.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986: 307–10.
Blackmann NJM. Reproducibility of clinical data I: continuous outcomes. Pharmaceut Statist 2004; 3: 99–108.
Itai N, Tanito M, Chihara E. Comparison of optic disc topography measured by Retinal Thickness Analyzer with measurement by Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2003; 47: 214–20.
Rohrschneider K, Burk RO, Kruse FE, Volcker HE. Reproducibility of the optic nerve head topography with a new laser tomographic scanning device. Ophthalmology 1994; 101: 1044–9.
Martinez de la Casa JM, Garcia Feijoo J, Castillo Gomez A, Garcia Sanchez J. Correlations between retinal thickness analyser (RTA) and confocal scanning laser tomography (HRT) in optic disc analysis. Arch Soc Esp Ophthalmol 2004; 79: 21–5.
Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1557–63.
Published
2016-08-31
How to Cite
1.
Rekič A, Cvenkel B. Comparison of optic nerve head topography in normal eyes using confocal laser scanning tomograph and retinal thickness analyzer. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 31Aug.2016 [cited 5Aug.2024];74(10). Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/2148
Section
Research article

Most read articles by the same author(s)