A dual-chamber pacing mode to minimize ventricular pacing

  • Peter Rakovec
Keywords: cardiac pacemaker, pacing mode, heart failure, atrial fibrillation

Abstract

Background: Though patients with sick sinus syndrome theoretically need an atrial pacemaker only, they usually receive a ventricular or a dual-chamber pacemaker because of possible developement of atrioventricular conduction abnormalities. Right ventricular pacing produces left bundle branch block (i.e. pacing-induced ventricular desynchronization), promoting heart failure and atrial fibrillation. This problem can be solved by a special pacing mode which on one hand preserves the safety of dual-chamber pacing and on the other hand minimizes right ventricular pacing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rakovec P. Sinus node recovery time in patients with complete atrioventricular block. Cardiology 1981; 67: 31–7.

Rakovec P. Sinoatrial conduction time in patients with atrioventricular block. Cardiology 1981; 68: 161–6.

Barold SS. Permanent single chamber atrial pacing is obsolete. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2001; 24: 271–5.

Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA, Greenspon AJ, Freedman RA, Lee KL, Lamas GA, Mode Selection Trial Investigators. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation 2003; 107: 2932–7.

Shukla HH, Hellkamp AS, James EA, Flaker GC, Lee KL, Sweeney MO, Lamas GA. Heart failure hospitalization is more common in pacemaker patients with sinus node dysfunction and a prolonged paced QRS duration. Heart Rhythm 2005; 2: 245–51.

Kristensen L, Nielsen JC, Mortensen PT, Pedersen OL, Pedersen AK, Andersen HR. Incidence of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism in a randomised trial of atrial versus dual chamber pacing in 177 patients with sick sinus syndrome. Heart 2004; 90: 661–6.

Nielsen JC, Kristensen L, Andersen HR, Mortensen PT, Pedersen OL, Pedersen AK. A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: echocardiographic and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 614–23.

Savouré A, Fröhlig G, Galley D, Defaye P, Reuter S, Mabo P, et al. A new dual-chamber pacing mode to minimize ventricular pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005; 28 Suppl 1: S43–6.

Sweeney MO, Shea JB, Fox V, Adler S, Nelson L, Mullen TJ, et al. Randomized pilot study of a new atrial-based minimal ventricular pacing mode in dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Heart Rhythm 2004; 1: 160–7.

Knight BP, Gersh BJ, Carlson MD, Friedman PA, McNamara RL, Strickberger A, Tse HF, Waldo AL, for the AHA Writing Group. Science Advisory From the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias) and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group, in Collaboration With the Heart Rhythm Society. Role of permanent pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2005; 111: 165–72.

How to Cite
1.
Rakovec P. A dual-chamber pacing mode to minimize ventricular pacing. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 1 [cited 5Aug.2024];74. Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/2180
Section
Test Section