Intramyocardial electrograms measurements in patients after heart transplantation

  • Bojan Vrtovec
  • Tone Gabrijelčič
  • Urška Breskvar
  • Igor Zupan
Keywords: heart transplantation, acute rejection, pacemakers, evoked potentials

Abstract

Background: Adequate detection and treatment of acute allograft rejection is one of the most important predictors of post-transplant survival of cardiac transplant recipients. Recently, a number of novel, non-invasive tools have allowed for earlier detection and better treatment of rejection episodes.

Methods: Using the signal from a special pacemaker implanted during the transplant procedure, the intraventricular electrograms can be obtained. The amplitude and the conduction time of the intraventricular electrogram provide information on electrophysiological properties of ventricular myocardium. Due to edema and inflammation during acute rejection, the amplitude of the signal decreases and the conduction time is prolonged.

Results: In Ljubljana Medical Center Transplantation Programme the measurement of intramyocardial electrograms has been shown to represent a reproducible and reliable methodology which led to fewer cardiac biopsy procedures and earlier and better treatment of cardiac allograft rejection.

Conclusions: The analysis of intramyocardial electrograms is an important non-invasive tool which allows for better follow-up of cardiac transplant recipients and earlier detection and treatment of allograft rejection episodes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baran DA, Galin ID, Gass AL. Current practices: immunosuppression induction, maintenance, and rejection regimens in contemporary postheart transplant patient treatment. Curr Opin Cardiol 2002; 17: 165–70.

John R, Rajasinghe HA, Chen JM, Weinberg AD, Sinha P, Mancini DM, et al. Long-term outcomes after cardiac transplantation: an experience based on different eras of immunosuppressive therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72: 440–9.

Kobashigawa JA. Postoperative management following heart transplantation. Transpl Proceedings 1999; 31: 2038–46.

Deng MC. Cardiac transplantation. Heart 2002; 87: 177–84.

Mahaux V, Demoulin JC, Biessaux Y, Radermecker M. Heart graft monitoring by the ventricular evoked response. PACE 2000; 23: 2003–5.

Richartz BM, Radovancevic B, Bologna TM, Frazier OH. Usefulness of the QTc interval in predicting acute allograft rejection. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 46: 217–21.

Grasser B, Iberer F, Schaffellner S, Kniepeiss D. Non-invasive graft monitoring after heart transplantation: rationale to reduce the number of endomyocardial biopsies.

Grasser B, Iberer F, Scheier G. Intramyocardial electrograms for noninvasive rejection monitoring: initial experience with an infection-specific parameter. Transpl Int 1998; 11: 508–11.

Grasser B, Iberer F, Schreier G, Kastner P. Computerized heart allograftrecipient monitoring: a multicenter study. Transpl Int 2003; 16: 225–30.

Eisen HJ. Noninvasive detection of cardiac transplant rejection using electronic monitoring. Curr Opin Cardiol 1999; 14: 151–4.

Zupan I, Vrtovec B, Breskvar UD, Gabrijelcic T. Noninvasive monitoring of rejection therapy based on intramyocardial electrograms after orthotopic heart transplantation. Initial experience with 14 cases. Int Immunopharmacol 2005; 5: 59–65.

How to Cite
1.
Vrtovec B, Gabrijelčič T, Breskvar U, Zupan I. Intramyocardial electrograms measurements in patients after heart transplantation. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 1 [cited 5Aug.2024];74. Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/2181
Section
Test Section

Most read articles by the same author(s)