DIAGNOSIS OF URINARY INCONTINENCE TODAY

  • Matija Barbič Ginekološka klinika Klinični center Ljubljana Šlajmerjeva 3 1525 Ljubljana
Keywords: urinary incontinence, urine culture, urinary diary, one-hour pad test, urodynamic tests, videocystourethrography, ultrasound, EMG, pelvic floor

Abstract

Background. The aim of this paper is to present a modern approach to the patient with female urinary incontinence, the emphasis being given to diagnostic procedures applied at the University Medical Centre Ljubljana. History taking and clinical examination are of key importance; they serve as the basis for further examinations and procedures. After bacteriological and biochemical tests of urine, the diagnosis of urinary incontinence is confirmed by a one-hour pad test. In tertiary centres, however, urodynamic tests are used to assess the ability of lower urinary tract to collect, void, and prevent involuntary loss of urine. In more complicated cases urodynamic tests are combined with visual examinations (video cystourethrography and ultrasound). In the diagnostic procedures additional functional examinations are sometimes implemented (measurement of urethral electric conductance, ambulatory cystometry), and in certain cases electromyographic measurements of the pelvic floor muscles.

Conclusions. The diagnosis of urinary incontinence is a complex and technically demanding process, additionally aggravated by the fact that most intimate segments of human anatomy are involved.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Stanton SL, Andersen JT. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Scan J Urol Nephrol 1988; 114: Suppl: 5–19.

Stanton SL. Investigation of incontinence. In Stanton SL & Tanagho EA eds. Surgery of female incontinence, 2nd. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1986: 23–56.

Hilton P. Urinary incontinence during sexual intercourse: a common, but rarely volunteered symptom. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95: 377–81.

Yarker YE, Goa KL, Fitton A. Oxybutinin: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and its therapeutic use in detrusor instability. Drugs and Aging 1995; 6: 243–62.

Rossolimo G. Der Analreflex, seine Physiologie und Pathologie. Neurol Zentralblatt 1891; 10: 257–9.

Bors E, French JD. Management of paroxysmal hypertension following injuries to cervical and upper thoracic segments of spinal cord. AMA Arch Surg 1952; 64: 803–12.

Lapides J, Bobbit JM. Diagnostic value of bulbocavernosus reflex. JAMA 1956; 162: 971–2.

Vodušek DB, Janko M, Lokar J. Direct and reflex responses in perineal muscle on electrical stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983; 46: 67–71.

Blaivas JG, Zayed AAH, Labib KB. The bulbocavernosus reflex in urology: a prospective study of 299 patients. J Urol 1981; 126: 197–9.

Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bö K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JOL, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith ARB. The standardisation of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175: 10–7.

Bristow SE, Hilton P. Assessment and investigation for urinary incontinence. Bailliere’s Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000; 14: 227–49.

Carter PG, Lewis P, Abrams P. Urodynamic morbidity and dysuria prophylaxis. Br J Urol 1991; 67: 40–1.

Klinger HC, Madersbacher S, Djavan B et al. Morbidity of the evaluation of the lower urinary tract with transurethral multichannel pressure-flow studies. J Urol 1998; 159: 191–4.

Nielson D, Lupton EW. 3-day versus 7-day frequency/volume charts. Br J Urol 1996; 77: Suppl I: 12–2.

Abrams P. Urodynamic techniques. In: Abrams P. Urodynamics 2nd. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1997: 20–39.

Rose DK. Cystometric bladder pressure determinations: their clinical importance. J Urol 1927; 17: 487–501.

Summit RL, Bent AE. Genuine stress incontinence: an overview. In: Ostergard DR, Bent AE Eds. Urogynecology and urodynamics 3th. Baltimore: William & Wilkins 1991: 393–403.

Raz S, Caine M, Zeigler M. The vascular component in the production of intraurethral pressure. J Urol 1972; 108: 93–96.

Gosling J. The structure of the bladder and urethra in relation to function. Urol Clin North Amer 1979; 6: 31–38.

Ulmsten U, Stormby N. Evaluation of the urethral mucosa before and after estrogen treatment in postmenopausal women with a new sampling technique. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1987; 24: 208–11.

Fantl JA, Cardozo L, McClish DK. Estrogen therapy in the management of urinary incontinence in postmenopausal women: A meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 12–8.

DeLancey JOL. Structural aspect of the extrinsic continence mechanism. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 72: 296–301.

Staskin DR, Zimmern PE, Hadley HR et al. The pathophysiology of the stress incontinence. Urol Clin North Am 1985; 12: 271.

Gosling JA, Dixon JS, Critchley HOD, Thompson SA. A comparative study of the human external sphincter and periurethral levator ani muscles. Br J Urol 1981; 53: 35–41.

Constantinou CE, Govan DE. Spatial distribution and timing of transmitted and reflexly generated urethral pressure in helthy women. J Urol 1982; 127: 964–9.

Hilton P, Stanton SL. Urethral pressure measurement by microtransducer: the results in symptom-free women and in those with genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 90: 919–33.

Brune G, Öbrink A. Urethral closure pressure at stress. A comparison between stress incontinent and continent women. Urol Res 1977.

Farghaly SA, Shah J, Worth P. The value of transmission pressure ratio in the assessment of female stress incontinence. Arch Gynaecol. Suppl: 1985; 273: 366–6.

DeLancey JOL. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: The hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 1713–23.

Barbič M, Kralj B, Cör A. Compliance of the bladder neck supporting structures: Importance of activity pattern of levator ani muscle and content of elastic fibers of endopelvic fascia. Neurourol Urodyn (v tisku).

Bhatia NN, Bradley WE, Haldeman S. Urodynamics: continuous monitoring. J Urol 1982; 128: 963–8.

Plevnik S, Vrtacnik P, Janež J. Detection of fluid entry into the urethra by electric impedance measurement: electric fluid bridge test. Clin Physic Physiol Measur 1983; 4: 309–13.

McGuire EJ, Fitzpatrick CC, Wan J et al. Clinical assessment of urethral sphincter function. J Urol 1993; 150: 1452–4.

Enhörning G, Miller ER, Hinman F. Urethral closure studied with cineroentgenography and simultaneous bladder – urethra pressure recording. Surg Gynaecol Obstet 1964; 118: 507–16.

Stanton SL, Krieger MS, Ziv E. Videocystourethrography: its role in the assessment of incontinence in the female. Neurourol Urodyn 1988; 7: 172–3.

Quinn MJ, Beynon J, Mortensen NJM, Smith PJB. Transvaginal endosonography: a new method to study the anatomy of the lower urinary tract in urinary stress incontinence. Br J Urol 1988; 62: 414–8.

Johnson JD, Lamensdorf H, Hollander IN, Thurman AE. Use of transvaginal endosonography in the evaluation of women with stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 1992; 147: 421–5.

Hol M, Van Bolhuis C, Vierhout ME. Vaginal ultrasound studies of bladder neck mobility. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 47–53.

Kohorn EI, Scioscia AL, Jeanty P, Hobbins JC. Ultrasound cystourethrography by perineal scanning for female stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68: 269–72.

Schaer GN, Koechli OR, Schuessler B, Haller U. Perineal ultrasound for evaluating the bladder neck in urinary stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 220–4.

Gordon D, Pearce M, Norton P, Stanton SL. Comparison of ultrasound and lateral chain urethrocystography in the determination of bladder neck descent. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 182–5.

Kölbl H, Bernaschek G, Wolf G. A comparative study of perineal ultrasound scanning and urethrocystography in patients with genuine stress incontinence. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1988; 244: 39–45.

Barbič M, Kralj B. Effect of intra-abdominal position of the bladder neck and stability of its supporting structures on pressure transmission ratio after colposuspension. Int Urogynecol J 2000; 11: 97–102.

Smith ARB, Hosker GL, Warrell DW. The role of pudendal nerve damage in the aetiology of genuine stress incontinence in women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 29–32.

Snooks SJ, Badenoch DF, Tiptaft RC, Swash M. Perineal nerve damage in genuine stress urinary incontinence – An electrophysiological study. Br J Urol 1985; 57: 422–6.

Hale DS, Benson JT, Brubaker L, Heidkamp MC, Russel B. Histological analysis of needle biopsy of urethral sphincter from women with normal and stress incontinence with comparison of electromyographic findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 342–8.

Vodušek D. Clinical neurophysiological test in Urogynecology. Int Urogynecol J 2000; 11: 333–5.

Podnar S, Lukanovič A, Vodušek DB. Anal sphincter electromiography after vaginal delivery: Neuropatic insufficency or normal wear and tear? Neurourol Urodyn 2000; 19: 249–57.

Podnar S. Kvantitativna elektromiografija zunanje zapiralke zadnjika. Doktorsko delo. Ljubljana: Medicinska fakulteta, Univerza v Ljubljani. 2002: 1–154.

Fowler CJ, Kirby RS. Electromyography of the urethral sphincter in women with urinary retention. Lancet 1986; 1: 1455–6.

How to Cite
1.
Barbič M. DIAGNOSIS OF URINARY INCONTINENCE TODAY. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 1 [cited 5Aug.2024];72. Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/2219
Section
Review