CLINICAL EVALUATION OF ELECTRODIAGNOSTICALLY VERIFIED CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME

  • Breda Jesenšek Papež Oddelek za fizikalno in rehabilitacijsko medicino Splošna bolnišnica Maribor Ljubljanska 5 2000 Maribor
  • Zmago Turk Oddelek za fizikalno in rehabilitacijsko medicino Splošna bolnišnica Maribor Ljubljanska 5 2000 Maribor
Keywords: median nerve, provocative tests, symptoms, signs

Abstract

Background. The aim of the research was a clinical evaluation of a group of people with confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome and setting of useful instructions for daily use.

Methods. Prospective study includes 70 potential patients suffering from carpal tunnel syndrome. By using electrodiagnostics, the diagnosis could be confirmed with only 30 patients that were checked up. These were clinically evaluated on the following criteria: anamnesis, Katz-hand diagram, symptoms and signs.

Results. The study found a higher percentage of carpal tunnel syndrome in women. The difference between women and men in this respect is statistically significant (p < 0.05). In most cases, both hand are afflicted or, in the case of just one hand, usually the dominant one (20 patients [66.6%]). At an average, the problems lasted for 1184 days. The average age was 51.13 years. 22 people (73.3%) had coincident problems with the neck and shoulder. Typical symptoms were tingling, pain and awakening. In 66% (33 hands) disturbed sensory functions were registered: hypo sensibility 52%, hyper sensibility 14%. The first place of the provocative diagnostically tests takes Phalen (72% – 36 arms) followed by Tinel (70% – 35 arms), reverse Phalen 54% and tethered median nerve stress test 46%. The Katz diagram is not of a mentionable diagnostic value according to our experience.

Conclusions. The typical carpal tunnel syndrome can be clinically identified by a precise test performance, observation and with help of anamnesis. For the confirmation of the diagnosis and planning of the treatment the electrodiagnostic test is used.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rider BA. Carpal tunnel rehabilitation. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med 1991; 3: 27–57.

Schaumburg HH, Berger AR, Tomas PK. Disorders of peripheral nerves. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Davis, 1992: 226–34.

Katz JN, Stirat CR. A self-administered hand diagram for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg 1990; 15A: 360–3.

Kottke FJ, Lehmann JF. Krusen’s handbook of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1990: 33–50.

La Ban MM, Friedmann NA, Zemenick GA. Tethered median nerve stress test in chronic carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67: 803–4.

La Ban MM, MacKenzie JR, Zemenick GA. Anatomic observations in carpal tunnel syndrome as they relate to the tethered median nerve stress test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989; 70: 40–6.

AAEM, AA Phys Med Rehabil. Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome (summary statement). Neurology 1993; 43: 2404–5.

Podnar S. Kritična napotitev na elektrodiagnostično preiskavo perifernega živčevja. Zdrav Vestn 2003; 72: 205–12.

Dawson DM, Hallett M, Millender LH. Entrapment neuropathies: carpal tunnel syndrome. 2nd ed. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1990: 25–85.

Rosenbaum RB, Ochoa JL. Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical presentation. Boston: Butterworth – Heinemann, 1993: 35–55.

Phalen GS. Reflections on 21 years experience with the carpal-tunnel syndrome. JAMA 1970; 212: 1365–7.

Zimmerman NB, Zimmerman SI, Clark GL. Neuropathy in the workplace. In: Ghazi MR. Hand clinics: nerve compression syndromes. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 1992: 255–62.

Kaplan SJ, Glickel SZ, Eaton RG. Predictive factors in the nonsurgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg 1990; 15B: 106–8.

Brown RM, Davidson K, Doehr S. Provocative testing in the diagnosis of dynamic carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg 1989; 14A: 195–7.

Stevens JC, Sun S, Beard CM, O’Fallon WM, Kurland LT. Carpal tunnel syndrome in Rochester, Minnesota 1961 to 1980. Neurology 1988; 38: 134–8.

Spindler HA, Dellon AL. Nerve conduction studies and sensibility in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg 1982; 7: 260–3.

Katz JN, Larson MG, Sabra et al. The carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnostic utility of the history and physical examination findings. Ann Int Med 1990; 112: 321–7.

Uncini AD, Muzio A, Awad J, Kanente G, Tafuro H, Cambi D. Sensitivity of three median – to – ulnar comparative tests in diagnosis of mild carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle & Nerve 1993; 16: 1366–73.

Seror P. Sensitivity of various electrophysical studies for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (150 cases). Muscle & Nerve 1993; 16: 1418–9.

Gunnarsson L-G, Amilon A, Hellstrand P, Leissner P, Philipson L. Sensitivity and specifity of some clinical and electrophysiological tests. Hand Surg (British and European Vol.) 1997; 22B: 1: 34–7.

Kuhlman KA, Hennessey WJ. Sensitivity and specificity of carpal tunnel syndrome signs. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 76: 451–7.

Kuntzer T. Carpal tunnel syndrome in 100 patients: sensitivity, specificity of multi-neurophysiological procedures and estimation of axonal loss of motor, sensory and sympathetic median nerve fibers. J Neurological Sciences 1994; 127: 221–9.

Mossman SS, Blau JN. Tinel’s sign and the carpal tunnel syndrome. BMJ 1987; 294: 680–0.

Kuschner SH, Ebramazadeh E, Johnson D, Brien WW, Sherman R. Tinel’s sign and Phalen’s test in carpal tunnel syndrome. Orthopedics 1992; 15: 1287–302.

Slater RR, Szabo RM, Farver TB, Stanton DB, Sharman WK. The value of diagnostic testing in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg 1999; 24A: 714–4.

Seror P. Electroclinical correlations in the carpal tunnel syndrome. Apropos of 100 cases. Rev Rhum Mal Osteortic 1987; 54: 643–8.

Szabo RM, Gelberman RH, Dimic MP. Sensitivity testing in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg 1984; 66A: 60–4.

D’Arcy CA, McGee S. Does this patient have carpal tunnel syndrome? JAMA 2000; 283: 3110–7.

Padua L, Giannini F, Girlanda P et al. for the Italian CTS study group. Usefulness of segmental and comparative tests in the electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. The Italian multicenter study. Ital J Neurol Sci 1999; 20: 315–20.

Rosenbaum RB, Ochoa JL. Carpal tunnel syndrome: Interpretation of electrodiagnostic findings in carpal tunnel syndrome. Boston: ButterworthHeinemann, 1993: 163–9.

Ma DM, Liverson JA. Nerve conduction handbook. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company, 1983: 114–38.

Padua L, LoMonaco M, Gregori B, Valente EM, Padua R, Tonali P. Neurophysiological classification and sensitivity in 500 carpal tunnel syndrome hands. Acta Neurol Scand 1997; 96: 211–7.

Osterman AL, Whitman M, Della Porta L. Nonoperative carpal tunnel syndrome treatment. Hand Clin 2002; 18: 279–89.

Girlanda P et al. Local steroid treatment in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: short-and long-term efficacy. J Neurol 1993; 240: 187–90.

How to Cite
1.
Jesenšek Papež B, Turk Z. CLINICAL EVALUATION OF ELECTRODIAGNOSTICALLY VERIFIED CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 1 [cited 5Aug.2024];73(4). Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/2295
Section
Professional Article