SURGICAL TREATMENT OF MANDIBULAR CONDYLE FRACTURES USING THE TRANSPAROTID FACELIFT APPROACH – INTRODUCING A NEW METHOD OF TREATMENT

  • Aleš Vesnaver Klinični oddelek za maksilofacialno in oralno kirurgijo Kirurška klinika Klinični center 1525 Ljubljana
  • Andrej Kansky Klinični oddelek za maksilofacialno in oralno kirurgijo Kirurška klinika Klinični center 1525 Ljubljana
  • Andreja Eberlinc Klinični oddelek za maksilofacialno in oralno kirurgijo Kirurška klinika Klinični center 1525 Ljubljana
  • Matija Gorjanc Klinični oddelek za maksilofacialno in oralno kirurgijo Kirurška klinika Klinični center 1525 Ljubljana
  • David Dovšak Klinični oddelek za maksilofacialno in oralno kirurgijo Kirurška klinika Klinični center 1525 Ljubljana
Keywords: mandible fractures, mandibular condyle fractures, surgical treatment of facial fractures

Abstract

Background. In the past, fractures of the mandibular condylar process were treated almost exclusively conservatively at our institution, by means of a three week period of intermaxillary fixation (IMF), followed by excercises and a soft diet. In the last three years, we started treating these fractures surgically with increasing frequency by open reduction and internal fixation with mini plates and screws. Our goal was to determine the safety and efficiency of surgical treatment as the results of conservative treatment were often unsatisfactory.

Patients and methods. So far, 34 patients with 36 extraarticular condyle fractures were treated surgically by a periauricular transparotid approach. The operative procedure is demanding. Namely, branches of the facial nerve have to be identified, dissected and retracted, in order to reach the fracture site. The fracture was reduced and fixed with one or two mini plates. Patients were carefully followed up and were asked to answer a survey paper, which was completed by 32 patients.

Results. All of the patients were able to open their mouth immediately postoperatively. The postoperative IMF lasted 1 week at maximum and the facial symetry was achieved in all cases. Pre-traumatic occlusion was achieved in 31 out of 33 dentate patients (94%). Eight out of 36 cases (22%) had transitory weakness of the facial nerve branches, most often the buccal and zygomatic branch. Of these, 5 resolved completely at 2–8 weeks, while a mild degree of weakness is still present in the lower eyelid and half of the upper lip in a female patient, 13 months postoperatively. The cosmetic effect is good as the periauricular facelift incision leaves a barely perceptible scar. According to the postoperative survey completed by 32 patients, 30 of them (94%) were very satisfied with the outcome of treatment.

Conclusion. The procedure is safe with a careful surgical technique and the results of operative treatment are excellent.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ellis EE, Zide MF. Retromandibular approach. In: Ellis EE, Zide MF eds. Surgical approaches to the facial skeleton. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1995: 139–53.

Ellis EE, Zide MF. Rhytidectomy approach. In: Ellis EE, Zide MF eds. Surgical approaches to the facial skeleton. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1995: 154– 60.

Choi BH, Yoo JH. Open reduction of condylar neck fractures with exposure of the facial nerve. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88: 292–6.

Devlin MF, Hislop WS, Carto ATM. Open reduction and internal fixation of fractured mandibular condyles by a retromandibular approach: surgical morbidity and informed consent. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 40: 23–5.

Anastassov GE, Rodriguez ED, Schwimmer AM, Adamo AK. Facial rhytidectomy approach for treatment of posterior mandibular fractures. J Cran Maxillofac Surg 1997; 25: 9–14.

Hyde N, Mansiali M, Aghabeigi B, Sneddon K, Newman L. The role of open reduction and internal fixation in unilateral fractures of the mandibular condyle: a prospective study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 40: 19–22.

Eckelt U, Rasse M. Clinical, radiographic and axiographic control after traction screw osteosynthesis of fractures of the mandibular condyle region. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 1995; 96: 158–65.

Hayward JR, Scott RF. Fractures of the mandibular condyle. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 51: 57–61.

Konstantinović VS, Dimitrijević B. Surgical versus conservative treatment of unilateral condylar process fractures: Clinical and radiographic evaluation of 80 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 50: 349–52.

Takenoshita Y, Ishibashi H, Oka M. Comparison of functional recovery after non – surgical and surgical treatment of condylar fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 48: 1191–5

Dahlstrom L, Kahnberg KE, Lindahl L. 15 year follow-up on condylar fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989; 18: 18–22.

Zide MF, Kent JN. Indications for open reduction of mandibular condyle fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983; 41: 89–94.

Iizuka T, Lindqvist C, Hallikainen D, Mikkonen P, Paukku P. Severe bone resorption and osteoarthrosis after mini plate fixation of high condylar fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991; 72: 400–7.

Ellis EE, Simon P. Surgical complications with open treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 58: 950–8.

Burgess LPA, Goode RL. Diagnostic evaluation. In: Burgess LPA, Goode RL eds. Reanimation of the paralyzed face. New York: Thieme, 1994: 3–10.

Chen CT, Lai JP, Tung TC, Chen YR. Endoscopically assisted mandibular subcondylar fracture repair. Plast Reconst Surg 1999; 103: 60–5.

Schön R, Schramm A, Gellrich NC, Schmelzeisen R. Follow up of condylar fractures of the mandible in 8 patients at 18 months after transoral endoscopic-assisted open treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61: 49–54.

How to Cite
1.
Vesnaver A, Kansky A, Eberlinc A, Gorjanc M, Dovšak D. SURGICAL TREATMENT OF MANDIBULAR CONDYLE FRACTURES USING THE TRANSPAROTID FACELIFT APPROACH – INTRODUCING A NEW METHOD OF TREATMENT. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 1 [cited 5Aug.2024];73(7-8). Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/2341
Issue
Vol 73 No 7-8 (2004): July-August
Section
Professional Article


The Author transfers to the Publisher (Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal) all economic copyrights following form Article 22 of the Slovene Copyright and Related Rights Act (ZASP), including the right of reproduction, the right of distribution, the rental right, the right of public performance, the right of public transmission, the right of public communication by means of phonograms and videograms, the right of public presentation, the right of broadcasting, the right of rebroadcasting, the right of secondary broadcasting, the right of communication to the public, the right of transformation, the right of audiovisual adaptation and all other rights of the author according to ZASP.

The aforementioned rights are transferred non-exclusively, for an unlimited number of editions, for the term of the statutory

The Author can make use of his work himself or transfer subjective rights to others only after 3 months from date of first publishing in the journal Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal.

The Publisher (Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal) has the right to transfer the rights, acquired parties without explicit consent of the Author.

The Author consents that the Article be published under the Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 (attribution-non-commercial) or comparable licence.