NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL BASIS OF FUNCTIONAL DE-AFFERENTATION OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM CAUSED BY WEAK OR ABSENT MUSCLE CONTRACTIONS

  • Nejc Sarabon Institute of Sport Faculty of Sport Gortanova 22 1000 Ljubljana Slovenia
  • Milan R. Dimitrijevič Institute of Clinical Neurophysiology Neurological Clinic Clinical Center Zaloška 7 1525 Ljubljana Slovenia in Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA

Abstract

In this short article we discuss putative effect of decreased ability for movement in the progressive neuromuscular disorders on the central state of brain activity. We propose possibility that such reduced activation of proprioreceptors can lead to partial ‘functional de-afferentation’.

Furthermore, we briefly reviewed neurophysiological evidences of peripheral inputs to the central projections. We discussed contribution of the proprioceptive input after passive, active movements and movement induced by vibration of muscles tendons.

Finally we are proposing to introduce simple vibratory protocols in daily life of people with progressive neuromuscular disorders in order to prevent central effects of reduced proprioception to endurance of brain activity of people with intact mental functions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Weiller C, Marrett S, Fellows S, Rijntjes M, Leonhardi G, Kieel S, Muller S, Diener H, Thilmann A. Brain representation of active and passive movement. Neuroimage 1996; 4: 105–10.

Detimers C, Fink GR, Lemon RN et al. Relation between cerebral activity and force in the motor areas of the human brain. J Neurophysiol 1995; 74: 802–15.

Rolland PE, Larsen B, Lassen NA, Sinhoj E. Supplementary motor area and other cortical areas in organization of voluntary movement in man. 1980; 43: 118–36.

Valbo AB, Hagbarth KE. Impulses rcorded with micro-lectrodes in human muscle nerves during stimulation of mechanoreceptors and voluntary contractions. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1967; 23: 392.

Hagbarth KE, Vallbo AB. Dichrage characteristics of human muscle afferents during muscle stretch and contraction. Exp Neurol 1968; 22: 774–94.

Valbo AB. Muscle spindle response at the onset of isometric voluntary contraction in man. Time differencee between fusimotor and skeletomotor effects. J Physiol Lond 1971; 218: 405–31.

Radovanovic S, Korotkov A, Ljubisavljevic M, Lysikov E, Thunberg J, Kataeva G, Danko S, Roudas M, Medvedev S, Johansson H. Comparison of brain activity during different types of proprioceptive inputs: a positron emission tomography study. Exp Brain Res 2002; 143: 276–85.

Eklund G, Hagbarth KE. Motor effects of vibratory muscle stimuli in man. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1965; 19: 619P.

Eklund G, Hagbarth KE. Normal variability of tonic vibration reflexes in man. Exp Neurol 1966; 16: 80–92.

Hagbarth KE, Eklund G. The effect of muscle vibration in spasticity, rigidity and cerebellar disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1968; 31: 207–13.

Hagabart KE, Eklund G. The muscle vibrator – a useful tool in neurological therapeutical work. Scand J Rehab Med 1969; 12: 26–34.

Eklund G. Position sense and state of contraction; the effect of vibration. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1972; 35: 606–11.

Hagbart KE. The effect of muscle vibration in normal man and in patients with motor disorders. In: Desmedt JE ed. New developments in electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 3. Basel: Karger, 1973: 428–43.

Roll JP, Vedel JP. Kineaesthetic Role of Muscle Afferents in Man, Studied by Tendon Vibration and Microneurography. Exp Brain Res 1982; 47: 177–90.

How to Cite
1.
Sarabon N, Dimitrijevič MR. NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL BASIS OF FUNCTIONAL DE-AFFERENTATION OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM CAUSED BY WEAK OR ABSENT MUSCLE CONTRACTIONS. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 1 [cited 5Aug.2024];73. Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/2401
Section
Professional Article