ETHICS AND DEONTOLOGY IN PHARMACY

  • Aleš Krbavčič Fakulteta za farmacijo Aškerčeva 7 1000 Ljubljana
Keywords: medicinals, morals, patient autonomy, fair deal

Abstract

Moral and ethical principles in production and distribution of medicaments in R Slovenia are based on medieval heritage reflected in Dispensatorium Norinbergense by Valerius Cordus (1545) as proven by the solemn pledge given by Joanes Leykauff, apothecary at Novo mesto (1598) and the Apothecaries ordinance for the Duchy of Creina (given in Ljubljana, 1710). The subsequent evolution of pharmacy demonstrates the continuos care for quality production and distribution of medicament according to ethical and deontological normatives of its time.

Codex of pharmaceutical ethics of the Slovenian pharmaceutical society (2000), Codex of apothecaries deontology by the Apothecaries chamber of Slovenia (1994), The deontological codex of medicinal biochemists of Slovenia (1992) are three basic documents for pharmacist’s activities in Slovenia. Detailed instructions on production, distribution, prescribing and expediting to patients are given by the Medicinal products act and Medical devices act already harmonized with the European aquis communautaire.

Some ethical dilemmas concerning prescription free medicinals and selfmedication in EC and R Slovenia are presented. Insufficient or nonexistent communication between patients, medical doctors and pharmacists lead to noncompliant or risky medicamentation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Pintar I. Kratka zgodovina medicine. Ljubljana: Medicinska fakulteta, 1950: 20–2.

2. Nunn FJ. Ancient Egyptian medicine. London: British Museum Press, 1996: 132–2.

3. Minaržik F. Navodila za deželnega lekarnarja v Novem mestu (1598). In: Predin Š ed. Minaržikova zbrana dela I. Maribor: Mariborske lekarne, 2000: 285–93.

4. Krbavčič A. Lekarnarska uredba za Vojvodino Kranjsko iz leta 1710. Farm Vestn 1990; 41: 233–9.

5. Anon. Statuten fuer die Apotheker-Gremien in Krain und Kaernten. Ad Gub. Nr. 13762 de 1847. Natisnjeno v Ljubljani. Knjižnica SFD.

6. Krbavčič A. Etični in strokovni standardi farmacevtov. Lekarništvo 1998: 1–2

7. Slovensko farmacevtsko društvo. Kodeks farmacevtske etike SFD. Farm Vestn 2000; 51: 324–5.

8. Dolenc A. Medicinska etika in deontologija. Ljubljana: Tangram, 1993: 450–0.

9. Kodeks lekarniške deontologije. Ljubljana: Lekarniška zbornica Slovenije, 1994.

10. Pravilnik o strokovnem nadzoru s svetovanjem. Ur. list RS 1999, 98-4618.

11. Dolenc A. Medicinska etika in deontologija. Ljubljana: Tangram, 1993: 538–8.

12. Irgolič N. Register zdravil Republike Slovenije. Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za zdravstvo, 2000: 551–5.

13. Dickson M, Redwood H. Pharmaceutical reference prices. How do they work in practice? Pharmacoeconomics 1998; 14 (5): 471–9.

14. Mutschler E, Schubert-Zsilavec M. Risikofaktor Hipertonie: Volkskrankheit mit fatalen Folgen. Editorial. Pharmazie in unserer Zeit 2001: 297–7.

15. Grmek M, Budak A. Uvod u medicinu. Zagreb: Nakladni zavod Globus, 1996: 225–34.

16. Royal Pharm. Soc. of Great Britain. Medicines, ethics and practice. London: Royal Pharm. Soc. of Great Britain, 1995.

17. CPPE. Training for emergency hormonal contraception. Pharm J 2001; 266: 89–92.

18. Anon. Task force on postovulatory methods of fertility regulation. Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception. Lancet 1998; 352: 428–33.

19. Damaška R. Ekonomično ordiniranje magistralnih receptov. Ljubljana: Apotekarska komora Kraljevine Jugoslavije, Sekcija za Dravsko banovino, 1937.

20. Štampfl Š. Farmacevtska etika in izdajanje hormonskih sistemskih kontraceptivov. Diplomska naloga. Ljubljana: FFA, 2001.

21. Kogovšek-Vidmar T. Homeopatsko zdravljenje in homeopatska zdravila. Isis 1998; 7: 43–5.

22. WHO. Ethical criteria for medicinal drug promotion. Geneve: WHO 1988: 5–5.

23. Anon. Functional foods: public health boon or 21st Century quackery. Washington: Center for Science in the Public Interest, 2000.

24. Tabletke direkt za takojšen efekt. Ljubljana: Matik d.o.o., 2001.

25. Goodmann LS. The problem of drug efficacy. In: Talalay P ed. Drugs in our society. Baltimore: J. Hopkins Press, 1964: 49–68.

26. Primožič S. Trialog bolnik–zdravnik–farmacevt: spodbude in težave. Farm Vestn 1998; 49: 65–73.

27. Davis NM. Initiatives for reducing medication errors. The time is now. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 2000; 57: 1487–92.

28. Redaction. Priorite a la bonne intelligence entre medecins et pharmaciens. La revue Prescrire 2001; 21: 463–3.

29. Kogovšek-Vidmar T. Položaj, vloga in smeri razvoja lekarniške farmacije v slovenskem zdravstvenem sistemu. Specialistična naloga. Ljubljana: FFA, 2000: 60–80.

30. Pfeifer J. Zgodovina idrijskega zdravstva. Idrija: Mestni muzej, 1989: 114–4.
Published
2017-04-10
How to Cite
1.
Krbavčič A. ETHICS AND DEONTOLOGY IN PHARMACY. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 10Apr.2017 [cited 5Aug.2024];70(9). Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/2543
Section
Medicine and law