WHEN THE PATIENT IS UNWILLING OR UNABLE TO CO-OPERATE

  • Dušica Pleterski Rigler Komisija Republike Slovenije za medicinsko etiko Inštitut za klinično nevrofiziologijo Zaloška 7 1525 Ljubljana
  • Jože Trontelj Komisija Republike Slovenije za medicinsko etiko Inštitut za klinično nevrofiziologijo Zaloška 7 1525 Ljubljana
Keywords: informed consent, best interest, competent patient, mentally incapacitated patient, child, adolescent

Abstract

Background. Nowadays it is increasingly important for the physician to adequately inform the patient of his or her health situation, explain the options for treatment and obtain his or her consent. This principle is enshrined in the Oviedo Convention, a legal instrument with the power of law. Ethical questions arise when the patient is unwilling or unable to co-operate. Different problems are encountered with adult competent patients, in cases of limited mental capacity or with patients totally unable to consent. In children, the situation differs with age; adolescents’ opinion must be considered as increasingly important in decision making process, commensurate with their ability to understand and make rational choices. Specific ethical dilemmas arise with critically ill patients who refuse medical procedures or are unable to participate in medical decisions. Suicidal attempt cannot be taken to imply valid refusal of medical assistance.

Conclusion. In exceptional situations when an appropriate informed consent cannot be obtained, the physician should take his decisions according to his best professional judgement and in the best interest of the patient.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Council of Europe. Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine, the Convention on human rights and biomedicine. Oviedo. European Treaty Series 1997; 164: 1–12.

2. Trontelj J. Slovenija je 4. aprila 1997 podpisala Konvencijo Sveta Evrope o varstvu človekovih pravic in dostojanstva človeškega bitja v zvezi z uporabo biologije in medicine. Med Razgl 1997; 36: 245–57.

3. Nandi PL. Ethical aspects of clinical practice. Arch Surg 2000; 135: 22–5.

4. Fellows LK. Competency and consent in dementia. JAGS 1998; 46: 922–6.

5. Trontelj J. Etika v otroškem zobozdravstvu. Razprava za okroglo mizo. Zobozdr Vestn 2001; 1: 9–11.

6. Orr FE. The role of the paediatric nurse in promoting paediatric right to consent. J Clin Nursing 1999; 8: 291–8.

7. Trontelj J. O pravici Jehovovih prič, da odklonijo transfuzijo svojemu otroku. Isis 1996; 5: 15–6.

8. Trontelj J. Privolitev in nadomestno soglasje k zdravljenju in raziskavi na otroku: načela Oviedske konvencije. Slov Pediatr 1998; 5: Suppl 2: 22–5.

9. Working Party on Psychiatry and Human Rights (CDBI-PH) of the Steering Committee on Bioethics of the Council of Europe. »White Paper« on the protection of the human rights and dignity of people suffering from mental disorder, especially those placed as involuntary patients in a psychiatric establishment. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, DIR/JUR 2000; 2: 1–40.

10. Trontelj J. Stališče Državne komisije za medicinsko etiko o ravnanju z umirajočimi in o evtanaziji. Zdrav Vestn 1997; 66: 269–70.

11. Trontelj J. Pojasnila k stališču Državne komisije za medicinsko etiko o ravnanju z umirajočimi in o evtanaziji. Zdrav Vestn 1997; 66: 270–1.
Published
2017-04-10
How to Cite
1.
Pleterski Rigler D, Trontelj J. WHEN THE PATIENT IS UNWILLING OR UNABLE TO CO-OPERATE. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 10Apr.2017 [cited 5Aug.2024];70(9). Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/2544
Section
Medicine and law