SAFETY OF VENOMENHAL® VENOM IN MAINTENANCE HYMENOPTERA VENOM IMMUNOTHERAPY

  • Mitja Košnik University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases 4204 Golnik Slovenia
  • Ema Mušič University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases 4204 Golnik Sloven
  • Angelika Sager HAL ALLERGIE GMBH Düsseldorf Germany
Keywords: allergen extracts, Hymenoptera venom allergy, immunotherapy, safety

Abstract

Background. Venomenhal® (V) is a new brand of

Hymenoptera venom allergen for diagnosis and immunotherapy

of venom allergy. We studied the safety of switching the

patients treated with other brands of venom to V.

 

Methods. We performed duplicate skin prick tests with V and

ALK Reless® (R) venom extract (100 μg/ml) in 68 patients (50

males, 42 ± 15 years) on maintenance immunotherapy with

honey bee (26) or wasp (42) venom. On two consecutive maintenance

injection days 53 patients received in random order

either 100 μg of R or V venom.

 

Results. Weal diameter in skin prick tests (mean ± st.dev.) were

3.9 ± 1.1 mm (V) and 4.1 ± 1.0 mm (R) for bee venom (NS)

and 3.4 ± 1.0 mm (V) and 3.9 ± 1.2 mm (R) for wasp venom (p

< 0.01). Local reaction 30 minutes after maintenance injection

were 6.1 ± 1.7 cm (V) and 5.4 ± 2.5 cm (R) for bee venom

(NS) and 5.1 ± 1.8 cm (V) and 6.1 ± 1.8 cm (R) for wasp venom

(p < 0.05).

Late local reactions (LLR) and tiredness (T) on the day of injection

and 24 hours after injection were equally distributed

among both groups and were mild (LLR on the day of injection:

38% of patients [V] vs. 43% [R]. LLR after 24 hours: 28%

[V] vs. 28% [R]. T on the day of injection: 21% [V] vs. 23% [R].

T after 24 hours: 0% [V] vs. 6% [R]).

 

Conclusions. V was at least as safe as A. There were no adverse

reactions due to switching from one brand to another. Slightly

but significantly smaller weal in skin prick tests and immediate

local reactions might be due to lesser potency or better

purification of V wasp extract.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Settipane GA, Chafee FH. Natural history of allergy to Hymenoptera. Clin
Allergy 1979; 9: 385–90.

2. Müller U, Mosbech H. Position paper: Immunotherapy with Hymenoptera
venoms. Allergy 1994; 48: Suppl 14: 36–46.

3. Birnbaum J, Charpin D, Vervioet D. Rapid Hymenoptera venoms immunotherapy:
Comparative safety of three protocols. Clin Exp Allergy 1992; 23:
226–30.

4. Hunt JK et al. A controlled trial of immunotherapy in insect hypersensitivity.
N Engl J Med 1978; 299: 157–61.

5. Youlten LJF, Atkinson BA, Lee TH. The incidence and nature of adverse
reactions to injection immunotherapy in bee and wasp venom allergy. Clin
Exp Allergy 1995; 25: 159–65.

6. Mosbech H, Müller U. Side effects of insect venom immunotherapy: Results
from an EAACI multicenter study. Allergy 2000; 55: 1005–10.

7. Dreborg S. Skin tests used in type I allergy testing. Position paper. Allergy
1989; 44: Suppl 10: 11–59.

8. Bousquet J. Allergen immunotherapy: therapeutic vaccines for allergic
diseases. WHO position paper. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998; 102: 558–62.

9. Kochuyt AM, Stevens EAM. Safety and efficacy of a 12-week maintenance
interval in patients treated with Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy. Clin
Exp Allergy 1994; 24: 35–41.
Published
2017-04-13
How to Cite
1.
Košnik M, Mušič E, Sager A. SAFETY OF VENOMENHAL® VENOM IN MAINTENANCE HYMENOPTERA VENOM IMMUNOTHERAPY. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 13Apr.2017 [cited 5Aug.2024];70(10). Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/2553
Section
Original article