UTERINE ARTERY BLOOD FLOW MEASUREMENTS IN NORMAL AND ABNORMAL PREGNANCIES

  • Zvonko Šoštarič Splošna bolnišnica dr. Franca Derganca Ul. padlih borcev 13 5290 Šempeter pri Gorici
Keywords: pregnancy, hypertension, uterine artery, Doppler, compliance index, intrauterine growth retardation

Abstract

Background. Ultrasound Doppler measurements can provide important and useful information about the uterine circulation in pregnant women with hypertension and fetal growth retardation. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the velocity of uterine artery blood flow and compare the current known pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) with the new parameter – the compliance index (CI). The purpose of the research was an early detection and prediction of fetal growth retardation and hypertension in pregnancy. The research was made on Gynecology and Obstetrics Department of General Hospital in Nova Gorica from June 1994 to October 1996. All pregnant women were informed of the purpose and joined the research voluntarily signing an informed consent. The research was approved by The Board for medical and ethical matters.

Methods. A group of 80 randomly-selected pregnant women with single pregnancy was included in the research. The group was at the end of study divided into normal and pathological. The normal group was composed of 44 pregnant women with normal pregnancy, and the pathological group of 36 pregnant women with hypertension and fetal growth retardation. Doppler measurements of the uterine artery were made in a period between 18th and 40th week of pregnancy. The position of the placenta was also taken into account. A comparison of the velocity of blood flow, the PI and RI and the CI was made. The fetal body weight was also assessed on the basis of ultrasound measurements of fetal parameters.

Results. Analysis of general data between the groups revealed a statistically significant difference in the appearance of proteinuria, emergency Cesarean delivery and 2.6 times bigger relative risk for fetal anomalies in the pathological group. Measurements of fetal parameters and evaluation of fetal body weight showed a 87.5% sensitivity and a 96.9% specificity in the detection of intrauterine growth restriction.

There is a statistically important increase in the maximum systolic velocity and the velocity of blood flow in the notch, but without significant differences between normal and pathological group.

Analysis of the PI throuhgout the pregnancy revealed a statistically significant fall except in the pathological group on contralateral side of the placenta, while between the groups there were no significant differences. Analysis of measurements of the RI throuhgout the pregnancy revealed a statistically significant fall in the normal group, while in the pathological group the fall was not statistically significant neither on the placental, neither on the other side of the placenta. There were also no differences in RI between the normal and the pathological group. Analysis of the values of the CI between 21st and 34th week of pregnancy revealed a statisticaly significant difference between the normal and the pathological group. The prognostic value of the CI for the detection of hypertension and intrauterine growth restriction in this period showed a 44% sensitivity, a 75% specificity and a 45% positive predictive value. In the group of pregnant women with proteinuric hypertension the prognostic value of the CI in the same period showed a 70.6% sensitivity and a 62.2% specificity.

Conclusions. On the basis of obtained results it can be stated, that among all compared parameters, the CI of the uterine artery, measured on the side of the placenta, is the most sensitive parameter for the early prediction and detection of fetal growth retardation and hypertension, especially proteinuric. The results also confirmed the role of placentation on the changes in blood flow through the uterine artery. The low prognostic values for sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of a positive result can be explained by the large dispersion of measurements, the small number of subjects and not in the least also by our therapeutic procedures. The last two reasons probably contributed to the fact that no differences in the perinatal results between the two groups were found, and that there was no perinatal loss.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Chiswick ML. Intrauterine growth retardation. Br Med J 1985; 291: 845–8.

2. Evans MI, Linn CC. Retarded fetal growth. In: Linn CC, Evans IM eds. Intrauterine growth retardation: patophysiology and clinical management. New York: McGraw-Hill 1984: 55–77.

3. Burja S. Zahiranček – aktualen medicinski in družbeni problem. Zdrav Vestn 1986; 55: Suppl 1: 29–40.

4. Christie AD. The definition of the compliance index. Zagreb, 1993. 

5. Blejec A. Krivulja tež slovenskih novorojenčkov. Ljubljana: Ginekološka klinika, 1991.

6. Hadlock FP, Athey PA. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. Radiology 1985; 150: 535–40.

7. Aqilina J, Harrington K. Pregnancy and uterine artery Doppler ultrasound. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 435–40.

8. Jurković D, Jauniaux E, Kurjak A, Hustin J, Campbell S, Nicolaides KH. Transvaginal color Doppler assessment of the uteroplacental circulation in early pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 365–9.

9. Sekizuka N, Murakoshi T, Yoshizawa. The uterine and spiral artery flow velocity waveforms in early pregnancy: A transvaginal color and pulsed Doppler study. J Matern Fetal Invest 1994; 4: 229–32.

10. Harrington K, Goldfrad C, Carpenter RG, Campbell S. Transvaginal uterine and umbilical artery Doppler examination of 12–16 weeks and the subsequent development of pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9: 94–100.

11. Bower S, Bewley S, Campbell S. Improved prediction of preeclampsia by two-stage screening of uterine arteries using the early diastolic notch and color Doppler imagging. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 78–83.

12. Mires GJ, Christie AD, Leslie J, Lowe E, Patel NB, Howie PW. Are »notched« uterine arterial waveforms of prognostic value for hypertensive and growth disorders of pregnancy? Fetal Diagn Ther 1995; 10: 111–8.

13. Kofinas A, Penry M, Nelson LH, Meis PJ, Swain M. Uterine and umbilical artery flow velocity waveform analysis in pregnancies complicated by chronic hypertension or preeclampsia. South Med J 1990; 83: 50–5.

14. Fleischer A, Schulman H, Farmakides G et al. Uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in pregnant women with hypertension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 154: 806–13.

15. Harrington KF, Campbell S, Bewley S, Bower S. Doppler velocimetry studies of the uterine artery in the early prediction of pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991; 42: S14– S20.

16. Harrington K, Campbell S. Doppler ultrasound in prenatal prediction and diagnosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1992; 4: 264–72.

17. North RA, Ferrier C, Long D, Townend K, Kincaid-Smith P. Uterine artery Doppler flow velocity waveforms in the second trimester for the prediction of pre-eclampsia and fetal growth retardation. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 378–86.

18. Sato H. A study for predicting toxemia of pregnancy by the diastolic notch in the pulsed Doppler flow velocity waveforms of the uterine arteries – quantitative analysis. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi 1995; 47: 1055–62.

19. Chan FY, Pun TC, Lam C, Khoo J, Lee CP, Lam YH. Pregnancy screening by uterine artery Doppler velocimetry – which criterion performs best ? Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 596–602.

20. Harrington K, Cooper D, Lees C, Hecher K, Campbell S. Doppler ultrasound of the uterine arteries: the importance of bilateral notching in the prediction of pre-eclampsia, placental abruption or delivery of a small for gestational age baby. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 182–8.

21. Todros T, Ferrazzi E, Arduini D et al. Performance of Doppler ultrasonography as a screening test in low risk pregnancies: results of a multicentric study. J Ultrasound Med 1995; 14: 343–8.

22. Konchak PS, Bernstein IM, Capeless MD. Uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in the detection of adverse obstetric outcomes in women with unexplained elevated maternal serum α-fetoprotein levels. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 1115–9.

23. Šajina-Stritar B. Vrijednost protoka krvi kroz arteriju uterinu u prognozi razvoja gestoze i zastoja u rastu ploda. Magistarski rad. Zagreb: Medicinski fakultet, 1997.

24. Visser GHA, Stigter RH, Bruinse HW. Management of the growth retarded fetus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991; 42: 73–8.

25. Sibai BM, Frangieh AY. Management of severe preeclampsia. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 110–3.
Published
2017-04-20
How to Cite
1.
Šoštarič Z. UTERINE ARTERY BLOOD FLOW MEASUREMENTS IN NORMAL AND ABNORMAL PREGNANCIES. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 20Apr.2017 [cited 5Aug.2024];70(11). Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/2589
Section
Professional Article