THE RESULTS OF TREATMENT OF BENIGN PROSTATIC OBSTRUCTION WITH FINASTERIDE

  • Bojan Tršinar Klinični oddelek za urologijo Kirurška klinika Klinični center Zaloška 7 1525 Ljubljana
Keywords: benign prostatic obstruction, finasteride, efficacy, safety

Abstract

Background. Finasteride is an inhibitor of 5 alpha-

reductase. It prevents the conversion of testosterone into

dihydrotestosterone, which results in gradual decrease in prostatic

volume. The objective of the study was to determine the

impact of finasteride on subjective and objective symptomatic

improvement in patients with benign prostatic obstruction

(BPO).


Patients and methods. This open prospective multicenter study

of 6-month duration included 370 men, mean age 63 years

(range; 45–75 yrs), with clinical manifestations of BPO. The

enrolled patients received finasteride 5 mg/day. On the completion

of therapy, the patients were assessed for symptomatic

improvement, urinary flow and prostatic volume, determined

by rectal examination and ultrasound. Total prostate-specific

antigen levels in the serum were measured. At the end of the

study, the patients were asked to evaluate the efficacy of finasteride

therapy and to report its possible adverse side-effects.

Statistical analysis of the results was done using the Student ttest.


Results. Of the 370 patients enrolled, 303 (82%) completed the

6-month study period. The rate of urinary symptoms declined

by an average of 55%, of which nocturia by 28% and difficulty

in initiating the urinary stream by 74%. There was a

statistically significant decrease in prostatic volume on rectal

examination (14%; p < 0.0001) and abdominal ultrasound

(16%; p < 0.0037). The difference between both measurements

was statistically significant (p = 0.0037). Finasteride produced

a statistically significant improvement in maximum urinary

flow rate and voiding time (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0017,

respectively). Untoward side-effects were experienced by 3.5%

of the patients who had completed the 6-month period of finasteride

therapy. A the end of the study, 65% of the patients

reported notable improvement in micturition, and 76% stated

they would continue taking finasteride.


Conclusion. Placing patients with urinary symptoms due to

BPO on a 6-month course of finasteride has proved safe and

effective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. McConnell JD, Bruskewitz R, Walsh P et al. The effect of finasteride on the
risk of acute urinary retention and the need for surgical treatment among
patients with BPH. N Engl Med Surg 1998; 338: 557–63.

2. Girman CJ, Jacobson SJ, Guess HA et al. Natural history of prostatism:
Relationship among symptoms, prostate volume and peak urinary flow
rate. J Urol 1995; 153: 1510–5.

3. Rebust WK, Holtgrewe HL, Cockett ATK. Transurethral resection: Immediate
and postoperative complications. A cooperative study of 13 participating
institutions evaluating 3885 patients. J Urol 1989; 141: 243–5.

4. Lepor H, Williford WO, Barry MJ et al. The efficacy of terazosin, finasteride
or both in BPH. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 533–9.

5. Holtgrewe HL. The medical management of lower urinary tract symptoms
and BPH. Urol Clin North Am 1998; 25: 555–69.

6. Chapple CR. Alpha adrenoreceptor antagonists in the year 2000: Is there
anything new? Curr AP Urol 2001; 11: 9–16.

7. Gormley GJ. Finasteride: A clinical review. Biomed Pharmacother 1995; 49:
319–24.

8. Roehrborn CG. Accurate determination of prostate size via digital rectal
examination and transrectal ultrasound. Urology 1998; 51: 19–22.

9. Barry MJ, Fowler FJ, Bin L et al. The natural history of patients with BPH as
diagnosed by North American urologists. J Urol 1997; 157: 10–4.

10. Marberger MJ. Long term effects of finasteride in patients with BPH. A
double blind, placebo controlled, multicentre study. Urology 1998; 51: 677–
86.

11. Moore E, Bracken B, Bremner W et al. Proscar: 5-year experience. Eur Urol
1995: 28: 304–9.

12. Barr MJ, Cockett ATK, Holtgrewe HL et al. Relationship of symptoms of
prostatism to commonly used physiological and anatomical measures of
the severity of BPH. J Urol 1993; 150: 351–8.

13. Boyle P, Gould AL, Roehrborn CG. Prostate volume predicts outcome of
treatment of BPH with finasteride: Meta analysis of randomized clinical
trials. Urology 1996; 48: 398–405.

14. Roehrborn CG, Oesterling JE, Auerbach S. The Hytrin Community Assessment
trial study: A one-year study of terazosin versus placebo in the
treatment of men with symptomatic BPH. Urology 1996; 47: 159–68.

15. Andriole GL. Treatment with finasteride preserves usefulness of PSA in the
detection of prostate cancer: Results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo
controlled clinical trial. Urology 1998; 52: 195–202.

16. Fowley JS, Soloman LZ, Wedderburn AW et al. A prospective study of the
natural history of hematuria associated with BPH and the effect of finasteride.
J Urol 2000; 163: 496–8.

17. Hagerty JA, Ginsberg PC, Harmon JD, Harkaway RC. Pretreatment with
finasteride decreases perioperative bleeding associated with TUR of the
prostate. Urology 2000; 55: 684–9.
m03.p65
Published
2017-04-24
How to Cite
1.
Tršinar B. THE RESULTS OF TREATMENT OF BENIGN PROSTATIC OBSTRUCTION WITH FINASTERIDE. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 24Apr.2017 [cited 5Aug.2024];70(12). Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/2605
Section
Professional Article