Increased carotid intima-media thickness and low ankle brachial index in patients after acute myocardial infarction

  • Blaž Mlačak Zdravstveni dom Metlika CBE 71 8330 Metlika
  • Tanja Mišmaš Zdravstveni dom Metlika CBE 71 8330 Metlika
  • Matej Kolenc General hospital Novo Mesto, Novo Mesto, Slovenia
  • Rok Blagus Institute for Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Alenka Simonič Health Center Novo mesto, Novo mesto, Slovenia
Keywords: atherosclerosis, carotid arteries, peripheral arterial disease, intima media thickness, risk factors

Abstract

Background: Increased intima-media thickness (IMT) of the carotid arteries and the ankle–brachial pressure index (ABI) are generally considered an early marker of atherosclerosis. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of subjects with low ABI and an increased IMT as markers of atherosclerosis in a group of patients after myocardial infarction.
Methods: The test group included 50 patients after myocardial infarction (AMI), 32 males and 18 females aged between 38 and 78 years. The control group consisted of 50 subjects without ischaemic heart disease, who were comparable to the test group by age, gender and place of residence. High-resolution ultrasonography for the non-invasive measurement of IMT on the far wall at three different sites of the carotid arteries (the common carotid artery, carotid bifurcation, and internal carotid artery) has been used. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) was diagnosed in the lower extremities by means of Doppler ultrasound (ABI </= 0.9).
Results: The patients after myocardial infarction (IMT = median 0.85, interquartile range 0.72–0.95) compared to the subjects in the control group (IMT = 0.74, IQR 0.67–0.86) had significantly increased IMT (p < 0.05). The group of patients with AMI and PAD had significantly higher IMT, 0.93(0.86–1.03) in comparison with the group of patients with AMI and without PAD, 0.73(0.65–0.84) p < 0.001. The difference in IMT between patients with ST-elevation AMI (STEMI), 0.84 (0.70–0.96) and patients with non-ST-elevation AMI (NSTEMI), 0.89 (0.79–0.95) was not significant. The peripheral arterial disease was diagnosed in 24 (48 %) of patients after myocardial infarction and in 10 (20 %) of the control group (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Our study has demonstrated that increased carotid IMT and PAD are frequently present in patients after myocardial infarction. The subjects of the test and control group had an increased IMT and asymptomatic PAD.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mrak M, Bunc M. Kronične popolne zapore koronarnih arterij: klinični pomen in perkutano zdravljenje. Med Razgl. 2014;53(3):319–34.

Choi SY, Park JS. The comparison of carotid artery intima media thickness and plaque characteristics between patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and coronary artery chronic total occulsion. Biomedical Science Letters. 2015;21(4):198–207. https://doi.org/10.15616/BSL.2015.21.4.198.

Poredoš P, Poredoš P. Visnovič – Poredoš A. Pomen odkrivanja predkliničnih oblik ateroskleroze. Zdrav Vestn. 2006;75(8):475–81.

Rundek T, Gardener H, Della-Morte D, Dong C, Cabral D, Tiozzo E, et al. The relationship between carotid intima-media thickness and carotid plaque in the Northern Manhattan Study. Atherosclerosis. 2015 Aug;241(2):364–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.05.027 PMID:26071659

Herder M, Johnsen SH, Arntzen KA, Mathiesen EB. Risk factors for progression of carotid intima-media thickness and total plaque area: a 13-year follow-up study: the Tromsø Study. Stroke. 2012 Jul;43(7):1818–23. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.646596 PMID:22550052

Amato M, Veglia F, de Faire U, Giral P, Rauramaa R, Smit AJ, et al.; IMPROVE study group. Carotid plaque-thickness and common carotid IMT show additive value in cardiovascular risk prediction and reclassification. Atherosclerosis. 2017 Aug;263:412–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.05.023 PMID:28602434

Rooke TW, Hirsch AT, Misra S, Sidawy AN, Beckman JA, Findeiss LK, et al.; 2011 ACCF/AHA focused update of the Guideline for the management of patients with peripheral artery disease (updating the 2005 Guideline). A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2011 Nov;124(18):2020–45. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31822e80c3 PMID:21959305

Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FG, et al.; TASC II Working Group. Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease. Int Angiol. 2007 Jun;26(2):81–157. PMID:17489079

Den Ruijter HM, Peters SA, Anderson TJ, Britton AR, Dekker JM, Eijkemans MJ, et al. Common carotid intima-media thickness measurements in cardiovascular risk prediction: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2012 Aug;308(8):796–803. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.9630 PMID:22910757

Baroncini LA, de Castro Sylvestre L, Filho RP. Carotid intima-media thickness and carotid plaque represent different adaptive responses to traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2015 Aug;9:48–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2015.08.003 PMID:28785705

Naqvi TZ, Lee MS. Carotid intima-media thickness and plaque in cardiovascular risk assessment. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Oct;7(10):1025–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.11.014 PMID:25051948

Mlačak B, Blinc A, Pohar M, Stare J. Peripheral arterial disease and ankle-brachial pressure index as predictors of mortality in residents of Metlika County, Slovenia. Croat Med J. 2006 Apr;47(2):327–34. PMID:16625701

Nagler M, Kremer Hovinga JA, Alberio L, Peter-Salonen K, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Lottaz D, et al. Thromboembolism in patients with congenital afibrinogenaemia. Long-term observational data and systematic review. Thromb Haemost. 2016 Sep;116(4):722–32. https://doi.org/10.1160/TH16-02-0082 PMID:27384135

R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/

Eikendal AL, Groenewegen KA, Anderson TJ, Britton AR, Engström G, Evans GW, et al.; USE-IMT Project Group. Common carotid intima-media thickness relates to cardiovascular events in adults aged https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.04658 PMID:25624341

Velescu A, Clara A, Peñafiel J, Ramos R, Marti R, Grau M, et al.; REGICOR Study Group. Adding low ankle brachial index to classical risk factors improves the prediction of major cardiovascular events. The REGICOR study. Atherosclerosis. 2015 Aug;241(2):357–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.05.017 PMID:26071658

Chambless LE, Heiss G, Folsom AR, Rosamond W, Szklo M, Sharrett AR, et al. Association of coronary heart disease incidence with carotid arterial wall thickness and major risk factors: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, 1987-1993. Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Sep;146(6):483–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009302 PMID:9290509

Wald DS, Bestwick JP. Carotid ultrasound screening for coronary heart disease: results based on a meta-analysis of 18 studies and 44,861 subjects. J Med Screen. 2009;16(3):147–54. https://doi.org/10.1258/jms.2009.009038 PMID:19805756

Costanzo P, Perrone-Filardi P, Vassallo E, Paolillo S, Cesarano P, Brevetti G, et al. Does carotid intima-media thickness regression predict reduction of cardiovascular events? A meta-analysis of 41 randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Dec;56(24):2006–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.059 PMID:21126642

Cui R, Yamagishi K, Imano H, Ohira T, Tanigawa T, Hitsumoto S, et al.; CIRCS investigators. Relationship between the ankle-brachial index and the risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: the circulatory risk in communities study. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2014;21(12):1283–9. https://doi.org/10.5551/jat.24133 PMID:25078068

Heald CL, Fowkes FG, Murray GD, Price JF; Ankle Brachial Index Collaboration. Risk of mortality and cardiovascular disease associated with the ankle-brachial index: systematic review. Atherosclerosis. 2006 Nov;189(1):61–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2006.03.011 PMID:16620828

Newman AB, Shemanski L, Manolio TA, Cushman M, Mittelmark M, Polak JF, et al.; The Cardiovascular Health Study Group. Ankle-arm index as a predictor of cardiovascular disease and mortality in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999 Mar;19(3):538–45. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.19.3.538 PMID:10073955

Blinc A, Kozak M, Šabovič M, Božič Mijovski M, Stegnar M, Poredoš P, et al. Survival and event-free survival of patients with peripheral arterial disease undergoing prevention of cardiovascular disease. Int Angiol. 2017 Jun;36(3):216–27. PMID:27332992

Patil DR, Nikumbh SD, Roplekar K, Parulekar A. Anterior wall myocardial infarction with special reference to carotid intima media thickness, ankle brachial pressure index, and echocardiographic evaluation. Int J Sci Stud. 2015;3(5):167–73.

Eržen B, Šabovič M, Šebeštjen M, Poredoš P. Endothelial dysfunction, intima-media thickness, ankle-brachial pressure index, and pulse pressure in young post-myocardial infarction patients with various expressions of classical risk factors. Heart Vessels. 2007 Jul;22(4):215–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-006-0958-5 PMID:17653514

Lorenz MW, Polak JF, Kavousi M, Mathiesen EB, Völzke H, Tuomainen TP, et al.; PROG-IMT Study Group. Carotid intima-media thickness progression to predict cardiovascular events in the general population (the PROG-IMT collaborative project): a meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet. 2012 Jun;379(9831):2053–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60441-3 PMID:22541275

Bartels S, Ruiz Franco A, Rundek T. Carotid intima-media thickness (c IMT) and plaque from risk assessment and clinical use to genetic discoveries. Perspectives in Medicine. 2012;1(1-12):139–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.permed.2012.01.006.

Polak JF, Szklo M, O’Leary DH. Associations of Coronary Heart Disease with Common Carotid Artery Near and Far Wall Intima-Media Thickness: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Sep;28(9):1114–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2015.04.001 PMID:25944425

den Ruijter HM, Peters SA, Groenewegen KA, Anderson TJ, Britton AR, Dekker JM, et al. Common carotid intima-media thickness does not add to Framingham risk score in individuals with diabetes mellitus: the USE-IMT initiative. Diabetologia. 2013 Jul;56(7):1494–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-013-2898-9 PMID:23568273

Tattersall MC, Gassett A, Korcarz CE, Gepner AD, Kaufman JD, Liu KJ, et al. Predictors of carotid thickness and plaque progression during a decade: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Stroke. 2014 Nov;45(11):3257–62. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005669 PMID:25213342

Lee S, Cho GY, Kim HS, Yoon YE, Lee SP, Kim HK, et al. Common carotid intima-media thickness as a risk factor for outcomes in Asian patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Can J Cardiol. 2014 Dec;30(12):1620–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2014.06.026 PMID:25442460

Darabian S, Hormuz M, Latif MA, Pahlevan S, Budoff MJ. The role of carotid intimal thickness testing and risk prediction in the development of coronary atherosclerosis. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2013 Mar;15(3):306–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-012-0306-4 PMID:23328906

Goff DC Jr, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, Coady S, D’Agostino RB Sr, Gibbons R, et al.; 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul;63(25 25 Pt B):2935–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.005 PMID:24239921

Polak JF, Szklo M, O’Leary DH. Carotid intima-media thickness score, positive coronary artery calcium score, and incident coronary heart disease: The Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jan;6(1):e004612. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.004612 PMID:28110311

Published
2018-09-01
How to Cite
1.
Mlačak B, Mišmaš T, Kolenc M, Blagus R, Simonič A. Increased carotid intima-media thickness and low ankle brachial index in patients after acute myocardial infarction. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 1Sep.2018 [cited 19Apr.2024];87(7-8):324-3. Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/2664
Section
Original article