CUMULATIVE PREGNANCY RATE AFTER ELECTIVE SINGLE EMBRYOTRANSFER: THE IMPACT OF EMBRYO VITRIFICATION PROGRAMME
Abstract
Background: Multiple pregnancies are undesired consequence of infertility treatment by in vitro fertilization (IVF). In 2008 the Health Insurance Institute of Slovenia strove for lowering the number of multiple pregnancies. It widened the rights of patients by reimbursement of two additional IVF cycles, having totally six cycles reimbursed. But in women younger than 36, only one top-quality embryo in the first two IVF cycles has to be transferred. The aim of the study was to assess, how the new approach, including also the transfers of frozen-thawed embryos, influenced the IVF outcomes.
Methods: In year 2008, the transfer of one optimal embryo had to be done in 47.4 % (287/650) of IVF cycles. The criteria for optimality of early cleavage stage embryos were: at least 6 blastomeres and less than 20 % of fragmentation; and for blastocysts: expanded blastocoel and oval inner-cell-mass. Embryos were cultured to blastocysts in 79.4 % (228/287) of cycles. The surplus blastocysts were vitrified in 172 cycles. The transfer of devitrified blastocysts was performed in 82 patients, which did not conceive in fresh cycle. The pregnancy rate and twins rate after fresh transfers and after transfers of devitrified embryos were analyzed.
Results: Single embryo or blastocyst transfer was done in 58.9 % of women. In the remaining 41.1 % of cycles the embryos were morphologically not optimal and we decided for double embryo or blastocyst transfer. In the group in which a single and mostly the only embryo was trans- ferred, only 17.2 % of women became pregnant. After the transfer of elective single blastocyst, 51.4 % of women conceived. After double blastocyst transfer, 40.9 % of patients conceived and 50 % of them had twins. The replacement of devitrified blastocysts was successful in 23.2 %. The cumulative pregnancy rate in group of cycles with single fresh blastocyst transfer, followed by transfers of devitrified blastocysts, was 62.9 %. The cumulative pregnancy and multiple pregnancy rate in the whole group was 50.9 % and 14.4 %, respectively.
Conclusions: By the policy of reduction the number of transferred embryos into the uterus in IVF pro- gramme, the multiple pregnancy rate decreased from previously 40 % down to 14.4 %.
Downloads
References
Nyboe Andersen A, Goossens V, bhattacharya S, ferraretti AP, Kupka MS, de Mouzon J, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and intrauterine inseminations in Europe, 2005: results generated from European registers by EShRE: EShRE. The European IVf Monitoring Programme (EIM), for the European Society of human Reproduction and Embryology (EShRE). hum Reprod 2009; 24: 1267–87.
Schieve LA, Peterson hb, Meikle Sf, Jeng G, Danel I, burnett NM, et al. Live-birth rates and multiple-birth risk using in vitro fertilization. JAMA 1999; 282: 1832–8.
Vlaisavljevic V, Dmitrovic R, Sajko MC. Should the practice of double blastocyst transfer be abandoned? A retrospective analysis. Reprod biomed online 2008; 16: 677–83.
http://www.eshre.com/EShRE/English/Legal-Matters-and- Guidelines/Guidelines/Good-clinical-treatment-position-paper/ page.aspx/225 (6. 7. 2009).
GerrisJM.SingleembryotransferandIVf/ICSIoutcome:abal- anced appraisal. hum Reprod Update 2005; 11: 105–21.
MukaidaT,NakamuraS,TomiyamaT,WadaS,KasaiM,Takahashi K. Successful birth after transfer of vitrified human blastocysts with use of a cryoloop containerless technique. fertil Steril 2001; 76: 618–20.
hiraoka K, hiraoka K, Kinutani M, Kinutani K. blastocoele collapse by micropipetting prior to vitrification gives excel- lent survival and pregnancy outcomes for human day 5 and 6 expanded blastocysts. hum Reprod 2004; 19: 2884–8.
Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Ieda S, Kato o. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Reprod biomed online 2005; 11: 608–14.
Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato o, Leibo SP. highly efficient vitrifi- cation method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod biomed online 2005; 11: 300–8.
Kovacicb,VlaisavljevicV,ReljicM,Cizek-SajkoM.Developmental capacity of different morphological types of day 5 human mo- rulae and blastocysts. Reprod biomed online 2004; 8: 687–94.
Kovačič b, Vlaisavljević V. Influence of atmospheric versus reduced oxygen concentration on development of human blas- tocysts in vitro: a prospective study on sibling oocytes. Reprod biomed online 2008; 17: 229–36.
Kovačičb,SajkoMC,VlaisavljevićV.Aprospective,randomized trial on the effect of atmospheric versus reduced oxygen con- centration on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. fertil Steril. V tisku 2009.
Van Montfoort AP, fiddelers AA, Land JA, Dirksen CD, Severens JL, Geraedts JP, et al. eSET irrespective of the availability of a good-quality embryo in the first cycle only is not effective in reducing overall twin pregnancy rates. hum Reprod 2007; 22: 1669–74.
Kovačič b, Vlaisavljević V, Reljić M, Gavrić Lovrec V. Clinical outcome of day 2 versus day 5 transfer in cycles with one or two developed embryos. fertil Steril 2002; 77: 529–36.
Karlstrom Po, bergh C. Reducing the number of embryos trans- ferred in Sweden-impact on delivery and multiple birth rates. hum Reprod 2007; 22: 2202–7.
Loutradi KE, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Papanikolaou EG, Pados G, bontis I, et al. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta- analysis. fertil Steril 2008; 90: 186–93.
Virant-Klun I, Tomazevic T, Zorn b, bacer-Kermavner L, Mivsek J, Valentincic-Gruden b, et al. Successful freezing and thawing of blastocysts cultured in sequential media using a modified method. fertil Steril 2003; 79: 1428–33.
VanMontfoortAP,fiddelersAA,JanssenJM,DerhaagJG,Dirksen CD, Dunselman GA, et al. In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. hum Reprod 2006; 21: 338–43.
The Author transfers to the Publisher (Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal) all economic copyrights following form Article 22 of the Slovene Copyright and Related Rights Act (ZASP), including the right of reproduction, the right of distribution, the rental right, the right of public performance, the right of public transmission, the right of public communication by means of phonograms and videograms, the right of public presentation, the right of broadcasting, the right of rebroadcasting, the right of secondary broadcasting, the right of communication to the public, the right of transformation, the right of audiovisual adaptation and all other rights of the author according to ZASP.
The aforementioned rights are transferred non-exclusively, for an unlimited number of editions, for the term of the statutory
The Author can make use of his work himself or transfer subjective rights to others only after 3 months from date of first publishing in the journal Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal.
The Publisher (Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal) has the right to transfer the rights, acquired parties without explicit consent of the Author.
The Author consents that the Article be published under the Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 (attribution-non-commercial) or comparable licence.
