Perception of patient safety culture in Slovenian acute general hospitals
Abstract
Background: The goal of this research was to measure patient safety culture in all Slovenian acute general hospitals.
Methods: The hospital survey on patient safety culture questionnaire developed by researchers at Westat was used. Prior to this study, the questionnaire was psychometrically tested in three pilot hospitals and the results showed no need to modify the original model for the Slovene setting. Responses were scored on the 5-level Likert scale. The questionnaire was distributed to all hospital staff. After the exclusion of 159 questionnaires, which did not fulfil the inclusion criteria, 2932 (48.5 %) questionnaires were analysed. Descriptive statistics, confirmatory factor analysis, reliability of the scales, and construct validity were computed. For each item the percentage of positive, neutral and negative responses were calculated. Areas for improvement were defined as those answered positively by 50 % or less of the respondents. With one-way analysis of variance a comparison of the means among different sizes of the hospitals was performed.
Results: The confirmative factor analysis showed adequate fit for the model and the questionnaire reliability was also adequate. The average positive percentage for all 12 composites was 53 %. Composite scores of patient safety culture revealed that none reached the level that would establish safety strengths. Statistically significant differences of means for hospital size were found (d.f. 2, 337,006; p < 0,0005) but were practically unimportant.
Conclusion: The survey showed overall low patient safety culture, however it has provided the first insight into patient safety culture in acute general hospitals in Slovenia with several opportunities for improvement.
Downloads
References
Vincent C. Patient Safety.Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 2010.
Institute of Medicine: To err is human: building a safer health system Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
WHO: Call for more research on patient safety. Dosegljivo na: http://www.who.int/ mediacentre/news/releases/2007/pr52/en/index.html.
Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, Hebert L, Localio AR, Lawthers AG et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med 1991, 324: 370–6.
Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW. The quality in Australian health care study. MedJ Aust 1995, 163: 458–71.
Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin HR, Orav EJ, Zeena T, Williams EJ, Howard KM, et al. Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med Care 2000, 38: 261–71.
Schioler T, Lipczak H, Pedersen BL, Mogensen TS, Bech KB, Stockmarr A, et al. Incidence of adverse events in hospitals. A retrospective study of medical records (Danish). Ugeskr Laeger 2001, 163: 5370–8.
Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M.: Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ 2001, 322: 517–9.
Davis P, Lay-Yee R, Briant R. Adverse events in New Zealand public hospitals I: occurrence and impact. N Z Med J 2002, 115:U271
Baker GR, Norton PG, Flintoft V. The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverseevents among hospital patients in Canada. CMAJ 2004, 170: 1678–86.
Michel P, Quenon JL, De Sarasqueta AM, Scemama O: Comparison of three methods for estimating rates of adverse events and rates of preventable adverse events in acute care hospitals. BMJ 2004, 328: 199.
Robida A. Varnostni zaplet pri pacientu–nova znanost, stara praksa. Odgovornost v zdravstvu. posvetovanje Medicina in pravo na temo, Maribor, 2010 Mar 26. -27 Maribor, Slovenija.
Fourth International Atomic Energy Agency. Safety culture. International Safety Advisory Group, Safety Series 75-INSAG-4. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 1991.
Ashkanasy N, Broadfoot L, Falkus S. Questionnaire measures of organizational culture. In: Ashkanasy N, Wilderom C, Peterson M, eds. Handbook of organizational culture and climate. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000.
Singla AK, Barrett T, Kitch T. Assessing patient safety culture: A review and synthesis of the measurement tools. Patient Saf 2006, 2 : 105–15.
Sorra JS, Nieva VF. Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture. (Prepared by Westat,under Contract No. 290–96–0004). AHRQ Publication No. 04–0041. Rockville, MD:Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, September 2004.
Flin R, Burns C, Mearns K. Measuring safety climate in health care. Qual. Saf Health Care 2006; 15; 109–15.
Sperber AD: Translation and validation of study instruments for crosscultural research. Gastroenterology 2004, 126: 124–8.
Robida A. Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture in Slovenia: a psychometric evaluation. Int J Qual Health Care 2013, 25: 469–75.
Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, 6: 1–55.
Cohen JW. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hilldadale: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass; 1988.
Lang TA, Secic M. How to report statistics in mediciene. Philadelphia: American College of Physician; 2006.
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. Boston:Pearson Education; 2007.
Sorra JS, Dyer N. Multilevel psychometric properties of the AHRQ hospital survey on patient safety culture. BMC Health Serv Res 2010; 10: 199.
Hellings J, Schrooten W, Klazinga N, et al. Challenging patient safety culture: survey results. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2007; 20: 620–32.
Olsen E. Reliability and validity of the hospital survey on patient safety culture at a Norwegian hospital. In: Øvretveit J, Sousa P, eds. Quality and Safety Improvement Research, National School of Public Health, 2008: 173–86.
Smits M, Dingelhoff IC, Wagner C, et al. The psychometric properties of the ‘Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture’ in Dutch hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res 2008; 8: 230.
Pfeiffer Y, Manser T. Development of the German version of the hospital survey on patient safety culture: dimensionality and psychometric properties. Saf Sci 2010; 48: 1452–62.
Waterson PE, Griffiths P, Stride C, et al. Psychometric properties of the hospital survey on patient safety: findings from the UK. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19: 1–5.
Sarac C, Flin R, Kathryn Mearns K, et al. Hospital survey on patient safety culture: psychometric analysis on a Scottish sample. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011; 20: 842–8.
Cooper JB. Developing a culture of safety. Biomed Instr Technol. 2003; 37: 212–14.
Robida A. Kultura varnosti pacientov - pilotna raziskava o bolnišnični kulturi varnosti pacientov. Varnost - rdeča nit celostne obravnave pacientov 4. dnevi Angele Boškin 2011 Apr 7-8 ; Gozd Martuljek, Slovenija.
Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM et al. Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. JAMA. 2002; 288: 1987–93.
Reason J T, Carthey J, de Leval M R. Diagnosing “vulnerable system syndrome”: an essential prerequisite to effective risk management. Quality in Health Care. 200; 110 Suppl II:ii21–ii25.
Tourangeau R, YanT. “Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin. 2007; 133: 859–83.
vandeMortel TF. Faking it: social desirability response bias in selfreport research. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2008; 25: 40–8.
Dankelman J, Grimbergen CA. Systems approach to reduce errors in surgery. Surg Endosc. 2005; 19: 1017–21.
The Author transfers to the Publisher (Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal) all economic copyrights following form Article 22 of the Slovene Copyright and Related Rights Act (ZASP), including the right of reproduction, the right of distribution, the rental right, the right of public performance, the right of public transmission, the right of public communication by means of phonograms and videograms, the right of public presentation, the right of broadcasting, the right of rebroadcasting, the right of secondary broadcasting, the right of communication to the public, the right of transformation, the right of audiovisual adaptation and all other rights of the author according to ZASP.
The aforementioned rights are transferred non-exclusively, for an unlimited number of editions, for the term of the statutory
The Author can make use of his work himself or transfer subjective rights to others only after 3 months from date of first publishing in the journal Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal.
The Publisher (Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal) has the right to transfer the rights, acquired parties without explicit consent of the Author.
The Author consents that the Article be published under the Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 (attribution-non-commercial) or comparable licence.
