Computer planning of acetabular surgery: a future or a game (case report)

  • Anže Kristan
  • Matej Cimerman
  • Martin Tonin

Abstract

Background: Despite enormous development of modern traumatology in recent years, there are still some unanswered questions on specific fields of traumatology (acetabulum and pelvic surgery). In cooperation with computer technology the tools for computer assisted orthopedic surgery and computer planning of surgery were developed. Together with computer engineers we have developed computer tool for preoperative planning and virtual surgery for injuries of pelvis and acetabulum.

Methods: Data for planning is gained from CT scans of real patient in DICOM format. With segmentation of data the fragments are marked as individual objects. These free objects can be moved and rotated. At the end of virtual operation exact report is produced.

Results: Illustrative case of planning using this programe will be presented. The results of small study are presented as well.

Conclusions: Despite numerous systems for computer assisted orthopedic surgery there are only few centers that routinely use them. These systems are very useful in precise implant insertion, but they cannot enable reduction of the fragments in minimally invasive surgery. Our program enables virtual operations and learning of this non-routine surgery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Letournel E, Judet R. Fractures of the acetabulum. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1993.

Tile M. Acute pelvic fractures: I. Causation and classification. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1996; 4: 143–51.

Tile M. Pelvic fractures: Operative versus nonoperative treatment. Orthop Clin North Am 1980; 11: 423–64.

Tile M. The management of unstable injuries of the pelvic ring. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81: 941–3.

Mears DC, Rubash HE, Sawaguchi T. Fractures of the acetabulum. Hip 1985; 95–113.

Handels H, Ehrhardt J, Plotz W, Poppl SJ. Three-dimensional planning of hip operations and computer – assisted construction of endoprotheses in bone tumor surgery. Comput Aided Surg 2001; 6: 65–76.

Gellrich NC, Schramm A, Hammer B, Rogas S, Lufti D, Lagraze W, et al. Computer-assisted secondary reconstruction of unilateral posttraumatic orbital deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110: 1417–29.

Letournel E, Judet R. Fractures of the acetabulum. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1993.

Marchetti C, Bianchi A, Bassi M, Gori R, Lamberti C, Sarti A. Mathematical modeling and numerical simulation in maxillofacial virtual surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2006; 17: 661–7.

Munjal S, Leopold SS, Kornreich D, Shott S, Finn HA. CT-generated 3-dimensional models for complex acetabular reconstruction. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 644–53.

Attias N, Lindsey RW, Starr AJ, Borer D, Bridges K, Hipp JA. The use of a virtual three-dimensional model to evaluate the intraosseous space available for percutaneous screw fixation of acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005; 11: 1520–3.

Brown GA, Firoozbakhsh K, Gehlert RJ. Three-dimensional CT modeling versus traditional radiology techniques in treatment of acetabular fractures. Iowa Orthop Journal 2001; 21: 20–4.

Tonetti J, Cloppet O, Clerc M, Pittet L, Troccaz J, Melroz P, et al. Optimal placement of iliosacral screws: 3D computed tomography simulation. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2000; 86: 360–9.

Rommens PM, Hessmann MH. Acetabulum fractures. Unfallchirurg 1999; 102(8): 591–610.

Tsumura H, Kaku N, Ikeda S, Torisu T. A computer simulation of rotation acetabular osteotomy for dysplastic hip joint: does the optimal transposition of the acetabular fragment exist? J Orthop Sci 2005; 10: 145–51.

How to Cite
1.
Kristan A, Cimerman M, Tonin M. Computer planning of acetabular surgery: a future or a game (case report). TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 1 [cited 5Aug.2024];76(4). Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/1692
Section
Case report

Most read articles by the same author(s)