Navigation systems in skeletal surgery

  • Feri Štivan
  • Matej Cimerman
Keywords: computer assistance, navigation, traumatology, surgery, categories of CAOS

Abstract

Background: Surgical navigation systems are increasingly being used during trauma and orthopaedic surgery. The conceptual design of each of these devices is similar. The authors define three major components involved in the clinical aplication of surgical navigation: a surgical object, a virtual object and a navigator. These three elements are connected by registration and referencing. There are many pitfalls in application of CAOS. Many applications will be presented and their advantages and disadvantages will be elucidated.

Conclusions: More and more studies prove the superiority of the CAOS approaches over classic techniques in a number of applications. It is essential to know the basics and the limitations of the underlying technical principles. There is a considerable chance for using these devices incorrectly. From an economical point of view only the optimal performance of a navigation system will probably justify its significant investment costs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Langlotz F, Nolte LP. Technical approaches to computer-assisted orthopedic surgery. European Journal of Trauma 2004; 30: 1–11.

Nolte LP, Beutler T. Basic principles of CAOS. Injury Int J Care Injured 2004; 35 Suppl 1: A6–16.

Mohsen A, Phillips R. Letter of the reviewers. Injury Int J Care Injured 2004; 35 Suppl 1: A2–5.Bowersox JC, Bucholz RD, Delp SL, Gronemeyer D, Jolesz FA. Excerpts from the final report for the Second International Workshop on Robotics and Computer Assisted Medical Interventions. Comput Aided Surg 1997; 2: 69–101.

Fleute M, Lavallee S, Julliard R. Incorporating a statistically based shape model into a system for computer assisted anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Med Imaging Anal 1999; 3: 209–22.Stindel E, Briard JL, Merloz P, Plaweski S, Dubrana F, Lefevre C, Troccaz J. Bone Morphing: 3D morphological data for total knee arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 2002; 7: 156–68.

Kfuri M Jr, Gosling T, Westphal R, Wahl F, Krettek C, Hufner T. Robotic assisted fracture reduction – application on femoral shaft. In: Langlotz F, Davies BL, Bauer A, eds. Computer assisted orthopedic surgery. Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Meeting of CAOS-International. Darmstadt: Steinkopff; 2003. p. 182–3.

Seide K, Wolter D. Computerassistierte Frakturreposition mit dem Hexapodfixateur externe. Trauma Berufskrankh 1999; 1: 127–30.

Sautot P, Cinquin P, Lavallee S, Troccaz J. Computer assisted spine surgery: a first step toward clinical application in orthopedics. In: Merucci JP, Plonsey R, Coatrieux JL, Laxminarayan S, eds. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Piscataway: IEEE inc.; 1992. p. 1071–2.

Shoham M, Burman M, Zehavi E, Joskowicz L, Batkilin E, Kunicher Y. Bone mounted miniatur robot for surgical procedures-concept and applications. In: Langlotz F, Davies BL, Bauer A, eds. Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery – Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Meeting of CAOS-International. Darmstadt: Steinkopff; 2003. p. 330–1.

Ritschl P, Machacek F, Fuiko R. Computer assisted ligament balancing in TKR using the Galileo system. In: Langlotz F, Davies BL, Bauer A, eds. Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery – Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Meeting of CAOS-International. Darmstadt: Steinkopff; 2003. p. 304–5.

Messmer P, Baumann B, Suhm N, Jacob AL. Navigation systems for imageguided therapy: A review. Rofo Fortschr Geb Ronthenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2001; 173: 777–84.

Russel Taylor SL, Burdea G, Moesges R. Computer-integrated surgery. MIT Press 1996.

Messmer P, Gross T, Suhm N, Regazzoni P, Jacob AL, Huegli RW. Modalitybased navigation. Injury Int J Care Injured 2004; 35 Suppl 1: A24–9.

Langlotz F. Potential pitfalls of computer aided orthopedic surgery. Injury Int J Care Injured 2004; 35 Suppl 1: A17–23.

Gebhard F, Andreas W, Liener UC, Stockle U, Arand M. Navigation at the spine. Injury Int J Care Injured 2004; 35 Suppl 1: A35–45.

Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M. Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J 2000; 9: 235–40.

Schulze CJ, Munziger E, Weber U. Clinical relevance of accuracy of pedicle screw placement – a computed tomographic-supported analysis. Spine 1998; 23: 2215–21.

Gay SB, Sistrom C, Wang GJ, Kahler D, Boman T, McHugh N, Goitz H. Percutaneous screw fixation of acetabular fractures with CT-guidance: preliminary results of a new technique. J Roentgenol [Am] 1992; 158: 819–22.

Jacob AL, Messmer P, Stock KW, Suhm N, Baumann B, Regazzoni P, Steinbrich W. Posterior pelvic ring fractures: closed reduction and percutaneous CT-guided sacroiliac screw fixation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1997; 20: 285–94.

Stockle U, Krettek C, Pohlemann T, Messmer P. Clinical applications-pelvis. Injury Int J Care Injured 2004; 35 Suppl 1: A46–56.

Routt ML Jr, Kregor PJ, Simonian P, Mayo K. Early results of percutaneous iliosacral screws placed with the patient in the supine position. J Orthop Trauma 1995; 9: 207–14.

Routt ML Jr, Simonian PT. Closed reduction and percutaneous skeletal fixation of sacral fractures. Clin Orthop 1996; 329: 121–8.

Grutzner PA, Suhm N. Computer aided long bone fracture treatment. Injury Int J Care Injured 2004; 35 Suppl 1: A57–64.

Rampersaud YR, Foley KT, Shen AC, Williams S, Solomito M. Radiation exposure to the spine surgeon during fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw insertion. Spine 2000; 25: 2637–45.

Muller-Alsbach UW, Staubli AE. Computer aided ACL reconstruction. Injury Int J Care Injured 2004; 35 Suppl 1: A65–7.

Bukart A, Debski RE, McMahon PJ, Rudy T, Fu FH, Musahl V, et al. Precision of ACL tunnel placement using traditional and robotic technique. Comput Aided Surg 2001; 6: 270–8.

Widmer KH, Grutzner PA. Joint replacement-total hip replacement with CTbased navigation. Injury Int J Care Injured 2004; 35 Suppl 1: A84–9.

Widmer KH, Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of hemispheric acetabular sockets for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 2003.

Hube R, Birke A, Hein W, Klima S. CT-based and fluoroscopy-based navigation for cup implantation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Surg Technol Int 2003; 11: 273–9.

Dessenne V, Lavallee S, Julliard R, Cinquin P, Orti R. Computer assisted knee anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: first clinical tests. J image Guid Surg 1995; 1: 59–64.

Hofstetter R, Slomczykowski M, Sati M, Nolte LP. Fluoroscopy as an imaging means for computer-assisted surgical navigation. Comput Aided Surg 1999; 4: 65–76.

Suhm N, Jacob AL, Nolte LP, Regazzoni P, Messmer P. Surgical navigation based on fluoroscopy-clinical application for computer-assisted distal locking of intramedullary implants. Comput Aided Surg 2000; 5: 391–400.

Grutzner PA, Zheng G, Langlotz U, von Rectum J, Nolte LP, Wentzensen A, et al. C-arm based navigation in total hip arthroplasty-background and clinical experience. Injury Int J Care Injured 2004; 35 Suppl 1: A90–5.

Schmucki D, Gebhard F, Grutzner PA, Hufner T, Langlotz F, Zheng G. Computer aided reduction and imaging. Injury Int J Care Injured 2004; 35 Suppl 1: A96–104.

Fuchtmeier B, Egersdoerfer S, Mai R, Hente R, Dragoi D, Monkman G, Nerlich M. Reduction of femoral shaft fractures in vitro by a new developed reduction robot system »RepoRobo«. Injury Int J Care Injured 2004; 35 Suppl 1: A113–9.

How to Cite
1.
Štivan F, Cimerman M. Navigation systems in skeletal surgery. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 1 [cited 5Aug.2024];74(11). Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/2170
Section
Review article

Most read articles by the same author(s)