HOW TO ASSURE THE MOST APPROPRIATE DOSAGE OF ANTIMICROBIAL DRUGS

  • Matjaž Pavlišič Krka, d. d. Dunajska cesta 65 1000 Ljubljana
  • Aleš Mrhar Fakulteta za farmacijo Aškerčeva 7 1000 Ljubljana
Keywords: antimicrobial drugs, pathogen susceptibility, pharmacokinetics, efficacy indices

Abstract

Background. The final response of a patient to

antimicrobial treatment depends on a number of different

variables. The use of susceptibility endpoints with respect to

the antibiotic concentrations achievable in vivo represents the

conventional approach to clinical dosing of antimicrobial

agents, i.e. by maintaining concentrations above the minimum

inhibitory concentration (MIC). Results from animal and clinical

studies have shown that it is not necessary to fulfil this

condition.

 

Clinical experience has shown that the success of antimicrobial

drugs which inhibit the synthesis of cell wall (betalactams),

depends on time when concentrations of drugs exceed MIC. In

drugs which inhibit the synthesis of proteins (aminoglycosides),

it is more important to achieve as high peak concentrations

in plasma as possible. Fluoroquinolones inhibit the synthesis

of nucleic acids and may show both types of kinetics.


Conclusions. Considering the microbiological and pharmacokinetic

criteria we can predict which antimicrobial drug

and what dosage regimen is the most appropriate. On the

basis of the literature data we proposed markers to enhance

the prediction of clinical outcomes, e.g. time for which

drug plasma concentration exceeds MIC (t > MIC), ratio between

peak plasma concentration of antimicrobial drug and MIC

(Cmax /MIC) and area under the inhibitory curve (AUIC).

 

With proper employment of markers for the prediction of the

effect of an antimicrobial drug we contribute to more successful

and rational use and, probably, to a slower development of

resistant organisms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Uetrecht J, Walmsley SL. Principles of antimicrobial therapy. In: Kalant H,
Roschlau WHE eds. Principles of medical pharmacology. 6th ed. New York:
Oxford University Press, 1998: 647–55.

2. Greenwood D. Modes of action. In: O’Grady F, Lambert HP, Finch RG,
Greenwood D eds. Antibiotic and chemotherapy: anti-infective agents and
their use in therapy. 7th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1997: 10–22.

3. Sanchez-Navarro A, Recio MMS. Basis of anti-infective therapy: pharmacokinetic-
pharmacodynamic criteria and methodology for dual dosage individualisation.
Clin Pharmacokinet 1999; 37: 289–304.

4. Li RC, Zhu M, Schentag JJ. Achieving an optimal outcome in the treatment of
infections: the role of clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of
antimicrobials. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999; 37: 1–16.

5. Li RC. New pharmacodynamic parameters for antimicrobial agents. Int J
Antimicrob Agents 2000; 13: 229–35.

6. Garraffo R, Dellamonica P, Drugeon HB, Etesse H, Lapalus P. A new approach
to optimal antibiotic dosage regimen by coupling pharmacokinetics
and killing curve parameters. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 1990; 12:
325–32.

7. Niederman MS. Role of quinolones in treatment of pneumonia and acute
exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice
1998; 7: Suppl 3: S206–10.

8. Rodvold KA, Piscitelli SC. New oral macrolide and fluoroquinolone antibiotics:
an overview of pharmacokinetics, interactions, and safety. Clin
Infect Dis 1993; 17: Suppl 1: S192–9.

9. Turnidge JD. Prediction of antibiotic dosing intervals from in vitro susceptibility,
pharmacokinetics and post-antibiotic effect: theoretical considerations.
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl 1990; 74: 137–41.

10. Dosage regimen design. In: Ritschel WA, Kearns GL. Handbook of basic
pharmacokinetics… including clinical applications. 5th ed. Washington: American
Pharmaceutical Association, 1999: 349–72.

11. Pharmacokinetics of multiple dosing. In: Ritschel WA, Kearns GL. Handbook
of basic pharmacokinetics… including clinical applications. 5th ed.
Washington: American Pharmaceutical Association, 1999: 270–95.

12. Rubinstein E, Lang R. Once-a-day beta-lactam antibiotic administration. J
Clin Pharmacol 1992; 32: 711–5.

13. Vogelman B, Gudmundsson S, Leggett J, Turnidge J, Ebert S, Craig WA.
Correlation of antimicrobial pharmacokinetic parameters with therapeutic
efficacy in an animal model. J Infect Dis 1988; 158: 831–47.

14. Dalhoff A, Ullmann U. Correlation between pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics
and efficacy of antibacterial agents in animal models. Eur J Clin
Microbiol Infect Dis 1990; 9: 479–87.

15. Craig WA. Antimicrobial resistance issues of the future. Diagn Microbiol
Infect Dis 1996; 25: 213–7.

16. Drusano GL, Craig WA. Relevance of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodinamics
in the selection of antibiotics for respiratory tract infections. J Chemother
1997; 9: Suppl 3: 38–44.

17. Balgos AA, Rodriguez-Gomez G, Nasnas R et al. Efficacy of twice-daily
amoxycillin/clavulanate in lower respiratory tract infections. Int J Clin Pract
1999; 53: 325–30.

18. Cook RC, Zachariah J, Cree F, Harrison HE. Efficacy of twice-daily amoxycillin/
clavulanate (‘Augmentin-Duo’ 400/57) in mild to moderate lower respiratory
tract infection in children. Br J Clin Pract 1996; 50: 125–8.

19. Damrikarnlert L, Jauregui AC, Kzadri M. Efficacy and safety of amoxycillin/
clavulanate (Augmentin) twice daily versus three times daily in the treatment
of acute otitis media in children. J Chemother 2000; 12: 79–87.

20. Cole P. Pharmacologic and clinical comparison of cefaclor in immediaterelease
capsule and extended-release tablet forms. Clin Ther 1997; 19: 617–
25.

21. Cazzola M, Di Perna F, Boveri B, Di Marco F, Diamare F, Centanni S.
Interrelationship between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
of cefaclor advanced formulation in patients with acute exacerbation of
chronic bronchitis. J Chemother 2000; 12: 216–22.

22. Lode H. Amoxicillin/clavulansäure (875/125 mg). Neue pharmacodynamische
Aspekte. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1999; 124: 1459–61.

23. Reed MD. Clinical pharmacokinetics of amoxicillin and clavulanate. Pediatr
Infect Dis J 1996; 15: 949–54.

24. Begg EJ, Barclay ML. Aminoglycosides – 50 years on. Br J Clin Pharmacol
1995; 39: 597–603.

25. Beović B. Odmerjanje aminoglikozidov enkrat na dan. Zdrav Vestn 1997;
66: 247–51.

26. Freeman CD, Nicolau DP, Belliveau PP, Nightingale CH. Once-daily dosing
of aminoglycosides: review and recommendations for clinical practice. J
Antimicrob Chemother 1997; 39: 677–86.

27. Beaucaire G. Does once-daily dosing prevent nephrotoxicity in all aminoglycosides equally? Clinical Microbiology and Infections 2000; 6: 357–62.

28. Andes DR, Craig WA. Pharmacodynamics of fluoroquinolones in experimental
models of endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 27: 47–50.

29. Marra F, Partovi N, Jewesson P. Aminoglycoside administration as a single
daily dose: an improvement to current practice or a repeat of previous
errors? Drugs 1996; 52: 344–70.

30. Nicolau DP, Freeman CD, Belliveau PP, Nightingale CH, Ross JW, Quintiliani
R. Experience with a once-daily aminoglycoside program administered to
2,184 adult patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995; 39: 650–5.

31. Freeman CD, Strayer AH. Mega-analysis of meta-analysis: an examination of
meta-analysis with an emphasis on once-daily aminoglycoside comparative
trials. Pharmacotherapy 1996; 16: 1093–102.

32. Ferriols-Lisart R, Alos-Alminana M. Effectiveness and safety of once-daily
aminoglycosides: a meta-analysis. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1996; 53: 1141–50.

33. Hatala R, Dinh T, Cook DJ. Once-daily aminoglycoside dosing in immunocompetent adults: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 1996; 124: 717–25.

34. Munckhof WJ, Grayson ML, Turnidge JD. A meta-analysis of studies on the
safety and efficacy of aminoglycosides given either once daily or as divided
doses. J Antimicrob Chemother 1996; 37: 645–6.

35. Barza M, Ioannidis JP, Cappelleri JC, Lau J. Single or multiple daily doses of
aminoglycosides: a meta-analysis. BMJ 1996; 312: 338–45.

36. Barclay ML, Kirkpatrick CM, Begg EJ. Once daily aminoglycoside therapy: is
it less toxic than multiple daily doses and how should it be monitored? Clin
Pharmacokinet 1999; 36: 89–98.

37. Forrest A, Nix DE, Ballow CH, Goss TF, Birmingham MC, Schentag JJ.
Pharmacodynamics of intravenous ciprofloxacin in seriously ill patients.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993; 37: 1073–81.

38. Thomas JK, Forrest A, Bhavnani SM. Pharmacodynamic evaluation of factors
associated with the development of bacterial resistance in acutely ill
patients during therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998; 42: 521–7.

39. Schentag JJ, Birmingham MC, Paladino JA. In nosocomial pneumonia,
optimizing antibiotics other than aminoglycosides is a more important
determinant of successful clinical outcome, and a better means of avoiding
resistance. Semin Respir Infect 1997; 12: 278–93.
Published
2017-04-14
How to Cite
1.
Pavlišič M, Mrhar A. HOW TO ASSURE THE MOST APPROPRIATE DOSAGE OF ANTIMICROBIAL DRUGS. TEST ZdravVestn [Internet]. 14Apr.2017 [cited 5Aug.2024];70(10). Available from: http://vestnik-dev.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/2557
Section
Review

Most read articles by the same author(s)